Wall Street Journal's take on the healthcare bill

1. 66

   SparklingJewelposted 14 years ago

   http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 … 64954.html

   replyreport
2. 66

   SparklingJewelposted 14 years ago

   wall street is just as much on the take as the US government...
   
   and citizens are allowing it to happen

   replyreport
3. 87

   livelongerposted 14 years ago

   The WSJ is a tool of Rupert Murdoch since he bought it a couple of year ago. It is rapidly becoming the print version of FoxNews.

   replyreport
   1. 63

      Mishaposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Or yeah, they both are evil. Now, when we get this out of the way, did they lie about 9pm Xmas eve final voting for health bill? And 38 hours for reading its revamped version?

      replyreport
      1. 87

         livelongerposted 14 years agoin reply to this

         I wouldn't say evil, but with a very clear partisan agenda.
         I don't know about the specifics you mention, only that the Right has so discredited itself in the last year or so that it's not worth the energy to see if their allegations have any merit anymore.

         replyreport
         1. 63

            Mishaposted 14 years agoin reply to this

            Let me get it straight - without even touching the topic of the thread, you are proceeding to try to discredit information source OP used. Nice try.

            replyreport
            1. 87

               livelongerposted 14 years agoin reply to this

               That's right. Ever read "The Boy Who Cried Wolf"?

               replyreport
               1. 63

                  Mishaposted 14 years agoin reply to this

                  You soooo remind me of Soviet times..."I did not read the book, but the author is a liar and damned capitalist, and the book is all lie and dirty insinuation" LOL

                  replyreport
                  1. 87

                     livelongerposted 14 years agoin reply to this

                     I wouldn't ascribe paranoia to everyone who grew up under Soviet communism. Maybe just you. LOL

                     replyreport
                     1. 63

                        Mishaposted 14 years agoin reply to this

                        So, now you leave subject changing attempt aside, and proceed to personal attacks? Nice try

                        replyreport
                        1. 87

                           livelongerposted 14 years agoin reply to this

                           Who called who a victim of Soviet propaganda? Yes, I wish you hadn't compared me to what you detest. That's really quite insulting. Or are you unwilling to fess up to that?

                           replyreport
                           1. 63

                              Mishaposted 14 years agoin reply to this

                              I said that your posts on this thread reminded me of Soviet times, and explained exactly how they did this. I did not call you a victim of Soviet propaganda, and did not imply that. Yet you did call me a paranoiac.
                              
                              This is degenerating to a sandbox level though, so I am outta this thread, have a nice evening.

                              replyreport
         2. 66

            SparklingJewelposted 14 years agoin reply to this

            the right has discredited its self...what about the left...OMG

            replyreport
4. 59

   OregonWinoposted 14 years ago

   All media has an agenda...if nothing more it is the agenda of the person writing or producing the piece.  There USED to be a standard of openness and objectivity, but that has been a joke for the past decade or more.  I find it amusing how upset the left gets about Fox etc when the BULK of the media has been left leaning for years.....sucks when it comes back around....
   
   Man....I am loving all of this Change!! 

   replyreport
5. 72

   pylos26posted 14 years ago

   You may leave at anytime.

   replyreport