|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Which Fallout is better, 3 or New vegas?
Which next gen Fallout did you prefer, and why?
New Vegas has more content than Fallout 3, but in all honesty New Vegas seems like more of an add-on to Fallout 3. There aren't major changes, and if I were you I would try out Fallout 3 first.
Oh, I have both, and I enjoy both, I was just wondering other peoples preference.
My boyfriend prefers 3 between the two though New Vegas has more stuff. New Vegas has more locations, but nothing much to them, so exploration can be pointless. Too bug as well. 3 had a better story to it compared to New Vegas.
I didn't play the games, but I watched him play it. I like watching 3 more than New Vegas because there was more action going on in the areas. Things weren't so spread out in 3 and when you got to an area, there was something to do event wise or to kill creature wise.
New Vegas to him and me, there seemed to be too many corners cut to just get it out.
Here's hoping there's going to be a graphical update in the next one, the graphics engine is ancient now...
Fallout 3's story is just epic in comparison to Fallout New Vegas. There's no "big sacrifice" in New Vegas, you just hunt a guy who stole your package, then help the armies solve their differences. On Fallout 3; you have to watch your father, to whom you've been searching for, die before your eyes, then you go on a epic quest to hunt down the G.E.C.K and save your fathers idea from the evil governments of the Old World. It's a mile better story; if only it could have the content of New Vegas (true iron-sights, hardcore mode, a home for followers)
I liked both, though I prefer New Vegas, overall. It felt more immersive to me, and there was a greater sense that the decisions you were making had an effect on the world around you. It also felt like you actually had more choices to make. Even though both games had a detailed 'open sandbox' environments to explore, Fallout 3's central plot felt fairly linear to me. It got to the point where it sometimes felt like I was doing something wrong by turning away from the main plot for a while to follow a sidequest.
Also, from a role playing point of view, there seemed to be greater scope for creating a particular types of characters, and playing them through to the end in New Vegas.
If you have already played 3, then I would say 3. If not, then New Vegas would win. Why? If you have not played Fallout 3, then you won't notice the lack of updating done in Vegas. Since Vegas has more things to do, and kind of feels like an expansion pack, a new player wouldn't mind these things. While someone who just beat 3 and picked up New Vegas would.
From a purely technical standpoint, I would say New Vegas wins out. The return of factions, the addition of ironsights and mods, and the general "more-ness" of New Vegas is superior. However, from a personal standpoint, New Vegas can't compare to Fallout: 3. In Fallout: 3, there was far more reward in exploring. My personal favorite quests were in Andale and The Republic of Dave, both of which you have to really look for if you don't know where they are. In New Vegas, there were a lot of locations which were just pointless (i.e. random caves with nothing but a few hostile animals inside or deserted locations with no loot or reason for existing). In Fallout 3, there were very few locations that didn't have something to them. Also, Fallout 3's plotline was much better, though I did really like the ending cinematic of New Vegas because it showed what happened to the places and groups you interacted with.
by Indigital6 years ago
Bethesda's two giant games. Which is better?
by Captain Redbeard6 years ago
Aside from the game freezing every 2 minuets, sometimes perminitly and having to restart, it's ok. I like FO3 better. My problem is that I told Boone and Rex to go wait for me at the Lucky and they disappeared off the...
by lee7 years ago
Cant wait for this game,if you are into rpg games then this is a must,months of gameplay in a massive world with interesting plots and characters,anyone else looking forward to this,or havent played it and want to know...
by Jester45546 years ago
Fallout New Vegas?Pretty much, I'm just wondering if anyone ever does articles on this game or asks questions about it, particularly those that pertain to the story line.
by KParsons3056 years ago
What makes Fallout: New Vegas a worthy game to buy amongst other RPGs like Dragon Age 2?
by gamster6 years ago
What kid of game should I buy for xbox 360im looking for a game that is adventure I love shooting but it doesnt have to be I love fiction I love games with character custimizatoin and most important I wont get bored...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.