How do people that have fallen through the safety net of government pay penalties?
If in 2014 everyone is required to have health care and not everyone qualified, how will they pay the penality? At one point insurance was no cost. Is this new stipulation a double edged sword? Is there more good or bad?
"At one point insurance was no cost," you said. No cost to whom? Insurance provided by the government, such as Medicare, has a cost shared by every taxpayer, and the patient receiving the care. Insurance provided by a privately owned company has a cost shared by employers and their employees (both as a payroll deduction and at the point of care as "co-pay".
The penalty paid now by those who can't afford insurance is devastating; just ask anyone who has had a major medical issue and made the mistake of going to a hospital emergency room. The unemployed, either now or in 2014, still pay out of pocket at the point of care.
I say, "Single Payer Healthcare Please!"
http://jimmiles.hubpages.com/hub/Single … are-Please
The very poor have Medicaid, Those over 65 or disabled have Medicare, The wealthy and some among the middle class can afford health insurance. This will now push the working middle class folks without insurance ever closer to poverty.
Who pays? We all will pay.
Not trying to nu-uh you here, but not everyone who is disabled qualifies for state health care. I make too much on disability to qualify for Medicaid and not enough to pay the deductibles and co-pays.
You are right, Our daughter is disabled and has the same trouble accessing medical care. Without a special program offered through the county mental health she would not receive any services, but after 2 yrs she will qualify for Medicare.
I would agree with George that was my point there are those who are in George's very situation and now they will be penalized if they do not have health coverage. I would suggest universal health care. If you look at the stats of those countries with it, we could learn a thing or two from them. If you want people to do their very best you should invest in their health.
Part of it is that everyone will have to qualify somehow. Right now, not everyone qualifies, and if you are poor with no dependents nor disability or aged, you're not eligible for any insurance...
Thing is, with this mandate, you would either be covered under the extended medicaid, or a subgroup where you'd pay a lower premium. Give it time, you'll see the benefits.
So, say if you are homeless, and can't afford anything. Right now, you could freeze to death under the bridge you live under, and no one is liable for anything, not even preventable medical service.
Under the new plan, it would spread out the burden further, thus creating competition. The competition not only lowers cost, but also creates more jobs, so now, the homeless couple could at least get a part time job and live at the YMCA.
For more info, please see my hub - http://likamarie.hubpages.com/hub/Ameri … are-Upheld
by Grace Marguerite Williams 4 months ago
Do you believe that the nuisance known as Obamacare will finally be repealed? Why? Why not?I believe that the government SHOULD NOT be in private affairs such as health care. I believe that health care is the sole responsibility of the individual. If individuals want health care,...
by ngureco 6 years ago
Why Can’t A Large Economy Like US Provide “Free” Health Care As It Is In UK And Canada?
by SparklingJewel 6 years ago
This legislation was covertly run through the system over the objections of at least half of the American people. The president justified it by saying that it didn’t raise our taxes. Now the Supreme Court has confirmed that’s exactly what the law does. The entire justification for the law is...
by Dennis L. Page 6 years ago
How will Republicans view the Olympics salute to National Health Care?Obviously the United Kingdom loves their National Health Care. Doctors and nurses made a stellar performance in the opening ceremonies of the Olympics. So, how will another country's love for socialized medicine play out with the...
by lauravan 2 years ago
What, if any, role should the government play in determining individuals' adoption of health insurance? If you think everyone should be required to have some form of health insurance, why? If you don't think it's necessary, why not? Consider the effects of pre-existing conditions, monopolies on...
by Susan Reid 7 years ago
What a SHOCK! The major CA health insurers have been fined for delayed and underpaid claims to physicians and hospitals. If it's happening here -- and it is -- it's happening elsewhere in the US, too. Who does this practice help? Duh. The longer insurers keep that cash in their pocket the more they...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|