- Politics and Social Issues»
- United States Politics
Romney, Obama or the NWO
With the United States elections coming up we should perhaps look at the real issue that affects the country today, the deficit.
If Romney and Obama are the candidates then there are only two questions that they need to be asked.
Firstly do they intend to do something about the US debt and secondly, how brave are they?
In the history of the United States only three Presidents have tried to make a real stand to ensure the stability of the dollar in the average American’s pocket. Unfortunately, these were three of the four Presidents that were assassinated.
That is why the candidates should be asked how brave they are. After all, isn’t it them that ultimately ask “fellow” Americans to serve and die in wars abroad for the good of their country?
- Who are the Leaders?
Are there a group of powerful people that really rule? They control the politicians and all their actions. They consider themselves Demi- Gods and beyond the law.
The New World Order (NWO)
At first the N.W.O. was thought to be fiction, a secret society dreamt up by a few conspiracy theory believers.
Now though, it seems to be more credible than people first thought and there are now a vast number who believe that there is more than just a little truth behind the theory.
The New World Order supposedly is a group of elite banking families that are intent on the domination of the world. These elite families own the Federal Reserve, Central Banks around the world and many of the main street banks as well as the Off Shore banks. They also have representatives on the IMF, World Bank and other international banking institutes.
This group also owns the TV stations, newspapers and most other media outlets in the West.
It is claimed that this group are systematically causing countries to become indebted to them through the printing of bank notes and loans, both of which they encourage by the use of their media to instigate wars, where whoever becomes the victor, both sides have to borrow from the same bankers.
Once a country is in debt to them, they effectively “run” it.
In order for politicians to run for office, they need the financial backing of these elite families and so, they too become indebted to them. Now if, one of these politicians wants to run for the office of President, then they certainly need to have the backing of these financiers and be even more indebted to them.
Of course, winning an election becomes “pay back” time.
- What New World Order?
There is a lot of talk about a New World Order. Is it just talk or is it not enough talk?
As I have said, there were three Presidents in the history of the US that have been seen to make a stand against these elite bankers, the first was Lincoln.
President Lincoln recognized the power that the bankers could acquire should the country rely on them to print, and lend it bank notes, remembering the interest that is charged on the loan of these notes.
Lincoln had had to use notes printed by the bankers to fund the civil war, but as the war ended he said:
The Government should create, issue, and circulateallthe currency... needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity."
If he had not been assassinated, the money in your wallet today may have said “United States Note” and not “Federal Reserve”.
President Garfield said that he wanted the bankers to prove that they had enough Gold to support the bank notes that they were printing. The bankers were just printing money in order to receive the interest: they could not support the “wealth” they were creating.
He made a speech shortly after his inauguration:
"Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce... when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate".
Once again, his assassination prevented any new legislation from taking place.
President Kennedy during a speech regarding secret societies said:
"we areopposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."
Some people have said that he was referring to the Soviet Union but if that was the case why mention it in a speech about secret societies?
If it really was the Soviet Union he was talking about, what reason would he have not to mention them by name?
Once more, due to an assassination, no action was taken.
- Why Debt?
With the World in so much debt, was it avoidable? Is it possible to fix? Perhaps it is all easier than you think.
That is why I say that the only difference either future President will make: is if he is in opposition to this so called New World Order.
Even if, by small chance, there is not such a secret society, then surely only good can be caused by ridding the country of the Fed., as currently ALL income taxes paid by US citizens goes to paying the elite bankers interest on notes printed, which could not have been supported by equivalent wealth at the time of printing.
Surely no future President whether it be Obama or Romney, considering the countries huge debt, can justify maintaining the current elitist system?