Will Obama be known more as the food stamp president or the biggest spender pres

1. 59

   Cassie Smithposted 11 years ago

   Will Obama be known more as the food stamp president or the biggest spender president?
   
   He has been so ineffective when it comes to things that matter.  In the end he may be seen as the most ineffective president of all time.  Instead of the greek columns he should just use a blank check as his new background when he reads from his teleprompter.

   replyreport
2. 79

   junksellerposted 11 years ago

   It really is grotesque when Presidents do things to help out citizens who are struggling. You have convinced me to vote Republican in 2012. I look forward to more immigrant bashing, tossing poor people out in the streets, mass murder of Muslims, beating up homosexuals, chastity belts, etc. Can't wait to get back to the good ol' days.

   replyreport
   1. 0

      Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      AHHHH, sarcasm from a lefty. Imagine that.

      replyreport
   2. 79

      junksellerposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      AHHHH, insults from a righty. Imagine that.

      replyreport
   3. 0

      Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Just calling 'em like I see 'em, Junk.

      replyreport
3. 60

   TAJKAJposted 11 years ago

   Time has shown that the the way a person is depicted in the future is based on the winner of current battles.  That being said it is had to believe that any one person could be responsibe for the creation of more lazy people than any other event in know history than him.  I know people who can work or work more and choose not to.  Some one has to pay the pie man eventually and it will be those who have made themselves indebted to the government. It is not throwing people on the street. It's making people choose between living within their means and getting tossed out on the street.  Or is going with out a smoke, beer, or cable tv on the big screen to much to ask when others are paying for it?

   replyreport
   1. 59

      Cassie Smithposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      What you say is true Tajkaj.  The work requirement allowed welfare recipients to go on to better jobs at higher pay and made them productive members of society.  Liberalism would keep them dependent on gov't and have low expectations.

      replyreport
4. 60

   nightwork4posted 11 years ago

   lmao. damn i wish a republican would have won instead of Obama. you folks would be dead in the water and then i wonder who you would blame it on.

   replyreport
   1. 0

      Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      We'd blame it on the guy in office even it was our guy, something Barack Hussein Obama and his supporters are incapable of, which speaks volumes about them all.

      replyreport
   2. 59

      Cassie Smithposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      I wished the same thing.  But we got  Obama and and we're so dead in the water that even you Canadians caught up with us.

      replyreport