jump to last post 1-2 of 2 discussions (4 posts)

Economic Growth Plans: Tastes Great,. Less Filling

  1. Mighty Mom profile image85
    Mighty Momposted 5 years ago

    Exceprted from Op Ed by Fareed Zakaria Opinion Writer
    Thought about posting the whole article but want to stimulate debate. Here are the two sides of the economic argument.
    Do you favor one or the other ... or does America need both, and why?

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ … tid=pm_pop

    Obama has been making the case that the U.S. economy needs investment — in infrastructure, education, training, basic sciences and technologies of the future. Those investments, in the president’s telling, have been the key drivers of American growth and have enabled people to build businesses, create jobs and invent the future.

    Romney argues that America needs tax and regulatory relief. The country is overburdened by government mandates, taxes and rules that make it difficult for businesses to function, grow and prosper, he says. He wants to cut taxes for all, reduce regulations and streamline government. All this, in his telling, will unleash America’s entrepreneurial energy.

  2. Cagsil profile image61
    Cagsilposted 5 years ago

    And I will laugh at both of them.....both are just using the same old same talking points to get elected.

    Neither one of the has any clue about how to go about doing either. lol

    And, sorry I don't drink Miller Lite beer btw. lol tongue

    1. Mighty Mom profile image85
      Mighty Momposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Well I don't drink it either.
      The article is kinda interesting, tho.
      I may post more of it if anyone other than you and I end up talking about it.
      Not that I mind one-on-one forums with you.
      (As long as I can WIN).

      1. Cagsil profile image61
        Cagsilposted 5 years agoin reply to this

        Typical woman, she always acts as if there's something to WIN. tongue