Unless you KNOW that you are going to otherwise die.
"Lifeguard gets $2,600 bill after rescuing boy from surf"
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/lif … 32240.html
I'm sure the kid's parents got equally screwed...
As a Brit who lives in America I find it incredible that no one over here wants socialized medicine.
Sure there are problems in the British Healthcare system, but everyone can walk into a hospital without that added stress of a huge bill afterwards - when my wife visited 15 years ago our daughter was ill - as a guest of mine they also got free healthcare.
For those who don't like waiting for operations there are a ton of private insurances to add to the healtchare (BUPA being one).
When my mother moved over here she sadly got cancer. When she was lying in a hospital bed dying, an administrator came up to her and told her that there was a problem with the health insurance she had through the airline - she was very upset and distressed.
Take the money factor out of healthcare and you get better healthcare.......
I should have put this under Politics and Social Issues. So I flagged my own OP and requested that HP moves it there.
I'm trying to justify this last statement with your previous statement that some people can buy private insurance to add to the healthcare. How does that "take the money factor out"? It seems to me that it merely shifts the money factor. "Better healthcare" is automatically free healthcare? There are many issues about American healthcare that I am trying to puzzle out and that I still have a hard time understanding.
One of the problems with socialized healthcare is the you may have to wait a month or two for non emergency surgeries. However some people buy additional insurance above and beyond the normal 'free' healthcare and can go into private hospitals - so there's a choice - if you want the best healthcare you can pay for it, if you are happy with socialized healthcare then you don't pay extra.
Of course, it should be noted that Social Healthcare is not free - everyone who works pays a contribution from their salary - when I lived there it was 6% not sure what it is now...
The idea of social healthcare is that 'we' all pay a tax so that there is a healthcare system that provides services for anyone - there are no co-pays or any other costs to the person receiving the healthcare...
This basically corroborates my statement that socialized medicine doesn't remove money from the equation, it merely shifts it. [Well, actually, you did say that, didnt you?] What happens to the person who can't afford the added insurance? Is the healthcare they receive truly identical to what the privately insured person receives? Time can be an issue in healthcare, even when someone can't afford the extra, private insurance. And time can change a non-emergency into an emergency.
When I lived in Germany for a year, I had to visit a doctor for a slight problem I had. When I asked about payment after the appointment, I was told that there was no charge because of the free healthcare system. I hated it! I know that other people would not feel the same way, and if it had been thousands of dollars I would possibly have appreciated it. But in my situation, I did not.
I have met people within the past two years who can walk into an American hospital today and receive free healthcare. Other people end up paying their costs because of higher fees that are passed along to them either through higher hospital costs or through their insurance. The money gets paid somewhere - from individuals, through insurance, through the government. I just haven't connected yet with the idea that it is somehow better to pay the same money through the government. (Or more money.)
The government is indeed better. I have personally witnessed from my neighbours how both ways work.
Corrupt ambulance company sends $1,900 invoice to government for a 3-mile, non-emergency trip. Government basically says, "go f**k yourselves, here's $200 and you can only bill the patient $170 more, take it or leave it." Company invariably accepts it.
Corrupt ambulance company sends $1,900 invoice to individual for a 3-block, non-emergency trip. Individual can't or wont pay because of the extortionist amount. Individual then gets hounded by collection agencies for years, and then eventually ends up paying around $4,000 after also paying the ambulance company's legal fees and court costs
Shifts it and increases efficiency. You pay for it through tax, and get the same service universally for a ~30 cut in cost (base on comparisons from US to UK/NZ. It is better because of this saving and because you don't end up with the working poor uncovered and getting no preventative (e.g. pre-natal) care. You don't have the case like the guy shot in Aurora with a bill shooting up but $50,000 a day and no way to pay it.
by OLYHOOCH 6 years ago
This is just one of many Re-plys, I receive each day. I thought I might share this one with you,,,,, Thanks. And from one of my favorite pundits, Stella Paul, more motivation to work our tails off in this election season. June 30, 2012 A Surgeon Cuts to the Heart of the ObamaCare Nightmare By...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 3 months ago
Do you believe that the nuisance known as Obamacare will finally be repealed? Why? Why not?I believe that the government SHOULD NOT be in private affairs such as health care. I believe that health care is the sole responsibility of the individual. If individuals want health care,...
by mio cid 6 years ago
Is calling an ambulance and going to the emergency room a sound healthcare system?
by Susan Reid 6 years ago
Mitt Romney, the architect of universal healthcare in Massachusetts (aka "Romneycare") has done it again. Flopped on camera and shown how out of touch he is with rank and file Americans.In 2010Romneyy appeared on MSNBC's Morning Joe and said that using ERs as health care wasn't fair to...
by Kyhnel 8 years ago
why is socialized healthcare so bad?i mean , instead of only to provide healthcare to the healthy people with money, why not give everybody a chance.
by ecoggins 5 years ago
Is the Republican party helped or hurt by their role in the 2013 government shutdown?The Republican members of Congress forced a government shutdown due to their objections to The Affordable Care Act (aka ObamaCare). Do you think this action will help or hurt their chances in the 2014 mid-term...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|