CaseOhio- Is it not clear that the GOP intention is to disenfranchise

Jump to Last Post 1-2 of 2 discussions (10 posts)
  1. Credence2 profile image80
    Credence2posted 6 years ago

    Doesn't the right winger ever cease with his lies and distortions? I was furious with their Voter ID Law where they wanted to extend voting days and time for the active duty military, but eliminate them for everybody else. The excuse was that the adminstrative costs associated with the extended hours were not justified. Well, Romney in his stupid way accused the Dems of attempting to disenfranchise the military. Nonsense, I would be more than happy to provide for the additional time to  resident active duty military located OUTSIDE of Ohio/or through absentee ballot, otherwise why are they treated differently than anyone else? It is clear what the intent of the GOP is, and what is that boys and girls? It is to adversely affect the voting patterns of demographic groups most likely to vote Democratic. No nonsense about voter fraud and the like, the GOP are scum. Well, this is checkmate and as Al Sharpton says, GOTCHA!

    Sorry, this is partisan and I do not apologize.

    But regardless of what side you are on, your thoughts please.

    1. Xenonlit profile image60
      Xenonlitposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      This is a racist and sexist coup d'etat in the making. It  is disenfranchisement of anyone who will not vote Republican. The courts need to shut it down.

      1. profile image0
        SassySue1963posted 6 years agoin reply to this

        Sexist? Racist? Really?
        Yes because only women and minorities would come out to vote early. Get a grip, you're really reaching here. The fact is that the majority of states only allow early voting for military personnel. This law in Ohio was not just passed either. Another Great Lie and brainwash of the Democrats. That these ID laws and the Ohio Law were just now passed to somehow sway the election. It is actually the other way around. Suddenly the DNC is concerned, but not about EVERYONE, only about certain people in certain states. Romney misstated to a point. The fact is the lawsuit by the WH makes the claim that if everyone can't vote early then the military should not either, which is what he was referring to. If anyone is trying to "rig" this election it is the Democrats. Trying to cherry pick in the swing states which polls will open early and remain open late, that Ohio lawsuit, which if successful could just cancel early voting, discounting many military votes. And attacking voter ID laws which were already ruled Constitutional in 2005 by the Supreme Court that have been on the books for years.

        1. Credence2 profile image80
          Credence2posted 6 years agoin reply to this

          Sue, Republicans faulted the extra time for civilians as too costly for local governments and prone to fraud and abuse. Meanwhile, service members were exempt from the restrictions, allowing them to vote at any time before polls close, an extra three days without restrictions.

          There was no basis to treat the civilians any different from the military particularely those that could vote in person like any civilian.
          Ohio has no justifiable reason to treat any of those that can vote in person differently. This is why it was shot down by the court as it should have been. Sue, we are not children, this is going on throughout the country, there are relatively mild Voter ID states and the harsh and unfair ones. Virginia is an example of the former. Texas, Pennsyvania, South Carolina Florida and Ohio are example of problematic ones
          We have got the courts to overturn the GOP legislative mischief for all but Penn. and that is next.....
          What is good for the goose is good for the gander,  a resident of the state in the military who can  vote in person should be treated no differently than a civilian, and for the Ohio GOP to try to make such a distinction and make it stick, is psychotalk.

      2. Credence2 profile image80
        Credence2posted 6 years agoin reply to this

        Xenonlit, We have got the courts on a roll with the overturning and Pennsylvania is next!

    2. Repairguy47 profile image59
      Repairguy47posted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Isn't it funny that the girl from San Antonio who testified before Congress on how it was so difficult to get to her local license office to get an ID had no problem getting to DC? I find the irony hilarious.

      1. Credence2 profile image80
        Credence2posted 6 years agoin reply to this

        Yes, it is to laugh, but the exception is hardly the rule. I stand with Holder and say to Texas, you cannot get away with your racist redistricting and disenfranchisement of minority groups by design. Who knows in the next election cycle or two Texas may well turn Blue

        1. Repairguy47 profile image59
          Repairguy47posted 6 years agoin reply to this

          You really have your finger on the political pulse of Texas dontcha?

          1. Credence2 profile image80
            Credence2posted 6 years agoin reply to this

            Thats a big 10-4!

  2. knolyourself profile image60
    knolyourselfposted 6 years ago

    They have to do more than just spend oooodles of money and rig the electronic voting machines.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)