What about the Photo ID requirent for voting?
One side says it's necessary to prevent voter fraud. The other side argues that it's a form of disenfranchisement along the lines of the poll taxes. Which way do you lean on this issue and why?
The disenfranchisement argument is frankly pathetically weak. For some time now Federal law has required that you cannot open a bank account without proper ID to prevent money laundering. Therefore these supposed disenfranchised will not have any place to cash a social security check, welfare check or any other form of monetary social assistance since these agencies do not pay cash. There is no rational downside to making such a request when you can't get on a plane or open a bank account without ID. In fact in some cities not having proper ID on you can be a condition for being arrested for vagrancy. Meanwhile just the other day we had another arrest of a sheriff in West Virginia running for a office on voter fraud charges. It is not going to totally prevent fraud. But it is a very reasonable request.
Opening a bank account is not equivalent to voting. Moreover, I don't recall ever being requested to show a photo I.D. when opening a bank account. Most of them fall all over themselves to get you to open an account. (Not denying that some banks req)
It has been Federal AML for more than a decade. You can not open account without proper ID or the bank is in violation of Federal anti money laundering laws. Meaning no account ability to deposit.
I totally agree LandmarkWealth, very weak argument they have. When you have to show an ID for just about anything you want to do to prove who you are, it is silly not to expect that from someone going to the polls to vote. It would move us in a backward direction if we stop asking for ID.
the truly weak argument is that these laws are meant to curtail voter fraud. to prevent recurrence of the seven cases of in person voter fraud in PA in the past ten years, over 800,000 registered pennsylvania voters will have to find transportation to a photo license center and most likely have to pay for documents to get the ID. it IS a poll tax. or they just won't vote. as the republican state house majority leader said after he got the bill passed, "we just delivered the state for romney". they are willing to cheat to win.
The cost of ID for those that don't have it is peanuts. And if they don't get it they can't open the bank out to cash the SS checks. minnesota had over 100 voter fraud convictions in 2008 election alone.
do you know if the minnesota cases were in person or absentee?
many people can't get to the photo center. in my county it's over a half hour drive. $10 for birth certificate and $10 for ID may seem like peanuts to you, but is not for some.
If someone is that indigent than they qualify for Gov't asst. So the Gov't asst will more than cover the cost. Yet they cant get the Gov't asst without the ID because they cant cash the check. Problem solved. The form of fraud is not relevant.
Very true. The I.D. efforts are concentrated in battleground states for a GOP political advantage. It's obvious.
Voter ID has been a topic of discussion all the way back to the 1980's. This did not just spring up. And Mccain got more of the supposed disinfranchised elderly senior vote in 2008 than Obama.
you do not need photo ID to access public benefits.
You need the ID to cash the check from a public benefit. State and Federal Social Asst do not pay cash. And you can't cash the check without ID to open the bank acct. That means no unemployment, Social Security and various other benefits
they don't send a check. it's direct deposit and the government issues a sort of debit card. you're far removed from the reality of poverty. i'm a social worker. i see these things often. also, i used to bank where they knew me and required no ID.
Social Security does issue debit cards. Most states do not for unemployment benefits. And I have worked in finance for 15 years. Read the patriot act. It is a Federal offense to open an account at any Financial Institution without proper ID.
Lacking a current necessary ID does not mean someone does not have a bank account. I've had 8 different addresses in 3 states since I opened my bank account over a decade ago. And at the time I think I opened it with a student ID.
Many people have old accts. Thats not relevant. Current law reasonably requests proper ID to open an acct. There was no evidence of an attempt on the president at the convention, yet ID was requird to enter. Is that discrimnatory to the poor ???
Not relevant? Your whole argument is basically that life is unmanageable without a proper ID. You are just plain wrong. Many people do it all the time. Try having some empathy with their lives rather than assuming you know everything.
No the argument is that "going foward" you cannot accomplish these things without proper id. so there in no reason that voting should not keep up with current changes to legislation.
that ignores all the folks getting by without what for them is an expensive ID right now. that ignores this election. 25 million people denied the right to vote.
Your still wrong. You don't seem to have any idea how the world of the poor works. It doesn't go by your rules. + The issue isn't just ID/no ID. The issue is timing. This stuff is coming just before an election because they know it will shrink votes.
This is not a timing issue. It came up all throug the 80's and 90's and even at one time in the 60's whenJFK got all theChicago dead to vote. Please dont tell me about poor.i grew up in the poorest area's ofNYC withnothing. If ID wasfree youd opposs
If it wasn't a timing issue it would be done well in advance of the election to ensure no one's vote was impacted. An organized and massive 11th hour effort is clearly and intentionally DESIGNED for a singular purpose: win by cheating.
Junkseller, there have numerous proposals for years in many states. Some of these just recently past. Considering it takes all of 1 day to get ID and the law was passed several months in advance, while most already have ID that's hardly 11th hour
180 bills in 41 states since 2011, much of that in the past 6 months in key states. You are not being fair to the real challenges these restrictions present to people. http://brennan.3cdn.net/f5f28dd844a143d … m6lyhy.pdf
Again, you can trace this as a controversy to at least the 60's. No shock here. I have obtained ID in both NY and Florida when I lived there. It's really not that difficult. If people with Down Syndrome can do it, the average voter can pull it off
Do you really expect anyone to accept that how hard you THINK something is or isn't matches the reality of how hard that thing actually is? Did you read the report? Places open one day a month, people without cars more than 10 miles away, etc.
While the concept of showing ID to participate in the democratic process seems relatively simple, the reality is that the rational behind the imposition of these new laws is disingenuous at best.
The truth is, in person voter fraud is not a widespread issue. In fact, voter fraud is easier to commit using absentee ballots than at the actual polls. The ID requirement doesn't solve that issue. The lead legislator in Pennsylvania let the cat out the bag when he declared that "This law will give Mitt Romney Pennsylvania in this upcoming election."
The reality is simple. Many of the individuals who will be adversely affected by this law tend to vote Democratic. Young people at college will now be required to obtain ID that lists their college address as their permanent address, or they will have to go to their home precinct in order to cast their vote.
Elderly people who may not have the necessary papers are also at risk of being left out of the process.
While in person voter fraud, if it actually existed, would be a serious problem, the efforts to disenfranchise individuals from participating in the democratic process is as serious an issue that every American should be concerned with.
To anyone who follows the issue it's obvious that the GOP's efforts to impose voter I.D. and other registration and voting requirements in the battleground states has nothing to do with voting fraud and everything to do with making it harder for minorities, the elderly, students and other likely Democratic voters. A number of academic studies show that voter identity fraud is very rare. The Republican Party chairman in Pennsylvania last month when he bragged that the passage of a new voter I.D. law would allow Romney to beat Obama in Pennsylvania. We should be encouraging, not discouraging, voter turnout.
It really doesn't matter what ID's people think others should have. The reality is that LOTS of people do not have the proper ID required by these ID laws. Some estimates are up in the 20-25 million range. The other reality is that the fraud intended to be prevented by these laws (in-person voter fraud) is exceedingly rare. The state of Pennsylvania in a court of law admitted that they didn't have a single verified case of in-person voter fraud EVER taking place in their state. Lots of people will tell you STORIES about in-person voter fraud happening. They are always just stories. Don't accept them. Ask them for legitimate and verifiable proof.
LandmarkWealth, for instance, points out the recent case of fraud in West Virginia. That case, however, involved absentee ballots and had nothing to do with in-person voter fraud.
Even if you could provide a legitimate reason for these laws, they still shouldn't be enacted right before an election. Getting proper ID isn't as easy as people make it sound. Well-to-do people never really seem to understand these types of issues. It isn't an accident that these laws and efforts, which by the way include purging voter rolls, restricting early voting, and making voter registration more difficult, are ALL being enacted months before an election by Republicans. They know that lowered turnout is in their favor and that these measures will lower turnout. Pure and simple this is a way to cheat to victory.
Again, if your poor then apply for Gov't asst. The revenue covers the cost of the ID 1000 fold. You cant cash the gov't aid checks without ID to open a bank acct. Fraud is Fraud. This is a very reasonable request. I got ID when I was poor/
LandmarkWealth, many of the indigent won't use a bank. If they get welfare checks, they take to one of the check cashing places that frequently won't ask for ID.
Actually most do require ID. More so than most places. And even if they didnt the check is more than enough to cover the cost of ID that is renewed for 7-10 years Perhaps we should be more concerned with the attempts inOhio to prevent military votes
We should be concerned with attempts to prevent any votes. Obama wasn't trying to restrict military voting in Ohio. He was trying to reinstate those early voting days that the GOP took away from everyone else.
They filed the suit to block a new state law allowing men and women in uniform to vote up until the Monday right before an election, while the cutoff on early voting for the rest of the public is three days earlier. How is that reinstatinganything
No, the law in question took away those 3 days from everyone BUT military personnel. That law has been overturned. Those 3 days are now open to everyone. http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf … hio_l.html
because the miliary was historically given special treatment as a result of their unpredictable nature of their deployment
There was no reason to take those days away from anyone (unless you are a Republican and know that those particular votes tend Democratic). That was the point.
No the point was there was a time frame set up for everyone on accordance with the law. Only the military was given special treatment and extra time because of there circumstance. Not Republicans.
The point was to expand voting opportunities. That's all. Unless you are opposed to that I don't see the issue here.
We don't have unlimited times to vote. There is one election day. Concessions can be made under certain circumstances but not just expanding days to everyone all the time. Why not just hold the 2016 election to while were at it.
35 states hold early voting, some of them with periods longer than 30 days. That is the norm, not a concession. The Ohio effort was restoring days taken away by the GOP in an earlier voter suppression effort.
You assume all this disenfranchisement is somehow republican based. The rules are the same no matter who you vote for. It effects everyone equally, so that means each side is equally supressed "supposedly" Or can democrats not follow rules as well.
I don't assume anything. Statistically, these efforts all impact Democratic leaning voters more than Republicans. They are less likely to have proper IDs, face greater difficulties in getting them, and are more likely to cast early votes.
The ID issue is simply nonense, Aside from that, Somehow Democrats are also less likely to vote because the deadline to vote is changed and anounced to everyone ??? It used to be Seniors were the ones hurt until the polls showed they voted Mccain.
If you make it harder to vote, fewer people vote. That's wrong regardless of who they vote for.
lw lives in an alternate reality. don't waste your time arguing with him.
my parting comment: folks with downs syndrome have social workers help them get their ID's. lw's comment about that borders on abuse.
Yes i live in an alternate reality even though I come from poverty that few americans have ever seen. By the way my nephew has Down Syndrome and he works and has ID and no social worker took him. He is quite self sufficient with less excuses.
I didn't think this is an issue at all since I.D.'s are meant to protect you from identity fraud and theft. If this is an issue about disenfranchisement I don't think they will just come out with cheap idea like this. It is not trivial that some citizens didn't have the opportunity to vote because of this and it's sad. It's sad because these people doesn't know how to value ID. If you don't have any families nor relatives I don't think you'll gonna survive without ID. Bottom-line is, it's not about disenfranchisement, this is about your identity.
by sunforged 11 years ago
Disenfranchisement Movement?Must have had my head in the dirt or clouds or something, but this topic is new "news" to me. Today I have read reports from Rolling Stone, 3rd party Think Tanks, Non Partisan Watchdog groups and many many traditional news sources.So has it been mainstream news...
by SparklingJewel 11 years ago
?????can you believe thishttp://ronpaulflix.com/2012/03/blatant- … R.facebook
by VC L Veasey 9 years ago
Which Political Party Wants To Make It Harder For Citizens To Vote And Why?
by Judy Specht 11 years ago
Why don't I have to show an ID to vote for president or anyone else?I have to show an ID to any policeman that asks, to get a prescription,see the doctor, get my blood drawn, board an air plane, get my taxes done, write a check, accept a job, withdraw money at the bank and sometimes when I use a...
by ga anderson 10 months ago
It's just for chuckles, not a serious discussion. There have been countless Voter ID discussions and the 'anti's' are seldom able to support their opposition, but when I saw this tweet it brought a chuckle.The gist: apparently the UK government is now requiring an ID to vote. It also appears that,...
by Ralph Schwartz 5 years ago
The story sounds like a headline ripped from a third-world nation. Election supervisors illegally adding votes, more and more votes appearing from hidden alcoves, and when challenged, Brenda Snipes is refusing to allow anyone to see or count the votes. Florida election laws are violated...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|