Does the GOP even one speck of decency left? I hope to hell the vets that vote remember this the next time those clowns come up for election.
(AP) WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans blocked legislation Wednesday that would have established a $1 billion jobs program putting veterans back to work tending to the country's federal lands and bolstering local police and fire departments.
Republicans said the spending authorized in the bill violated limits that Congress agreed to last year. Democrats fell two votes shy of the 60-vote majority needed to waive the objection, forcing the legislation back to committee.
Supporters loosely modeled their proposal after the President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's Civilian Conservation Corps used during the Great Depression to put people to work planting trees, building parks and constructing dams. They said the latest monthly jobs report, showing a nearly 11 percent unemployment rate for veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan, merited action from Congress.
Democratic lawmakers turned to the legislation shortly before they'll adjourn for the finals weeks of this year's election campaigns. The bill had little chance of passing the House this Congress, but it still allowed senators to appeal to a key voting bloc.
"(With) a need so great as unemployed veterans, this is not the time to draw a technical line on the budget," said Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida, the bill's lead sponsor, who faces a competitive re-election battle.
Republicans said the effort to help veterans was noble, but the bill was flawed nevertheless.
For National Guard, civilian jobs hard to come by
After war, vets fight for jobs at home
Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma said the federal government already has six job-training programs for veterans and there is no way to know how well they are working. He argued that making progress on the country's debt was the best way to help veterans in the long-term.
"We ought to do nothing now that makes the problem worse for our kids and grandkids," Coburn said.
Democratic officials did not have an estimate for how many veterans would be hired as a result of the legislation. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., said much would depend upon the number of applicants. She noted that more than 720,000 veterans are unemployed across the nation, including 220,000 veterans who have served since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. She said putting veterans back to work was the cost of war.
"Instead of meeting us halfway, we have been met with resistance. Instead of saying yes to the nearly 1 million unemployed veterans, it seems some on the other side have spent the last week and a half seeking any way to say no," Murray said.
The advocacy group Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America denounced the vote.
"This bill was smart bipartisan policy that would put veterans back into service for their communities as policemen, firefighters and first responders," the group's founder and chief executive, Paul Rieckhoff, said in statement. "The result of today's vote creates tremendous doubt that this Congress will be able to pass any additional veterans legislation in 2012. Iraq and Afghanistan veterans should not have to wait until 2013 for critical support from Congress."
A handful of Republicans joined with Democrats in voting to waive the objection to the bill: Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts, Dean Heller of Nevada, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Maine's Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe. Brown and Heller are also in tough re-election contests.
Heller said he was proud to support the bill.
"After everything our veterans have done for us, the least we can do is make sure they are afforded every opportunity to thrive here at home," Heller said.
How interesting that Heller and Brown are also two of the incumbent Rs who have publicly distanced themselves from Romney's comments on the 47%.
That even 5 Rs would break ranks and vote for this bill is encouraging.
I'd like to hope this is the beginning of the end of uber partisanship.
However, there may well be another side to this. Not having read the bill, who's to say what might have been loaded into it that the outraged soundbites are glossing over?
Hyper partisanship is running rampant on both sides to score public opinion points in this election season.
Well considering the GOP cuts seem to target the very jobs this bill might provide I guess I should have known this would have been the outcome.
How odd that Scott Brown voted FOR it then snarked on Elizabeth Warren in his forced debate (to me, the funnier story of the day is Harry Reid shutting down all Senate voting so that Scott Brown had no excuse to not debate in MA).
She proclaimed that he voted against the GI Jobs Bill.
He did NOT correct her. He did not state that he had, in fact, broken ranks with his fellow Rs and voted in favor of it.
Instead, he railed "What you don't know is this bill would cost the taxpayers $4.5 BILLION"
(I could have the actual number wrong but that was his retort).
Pretty unbelieveable that they even vote against a Vets' bill. I heard yesterday though that the military vote in Virginia is going toward Romney.
Interesting. I found that also on NPR.
However, Virginia overall polling is trending Obama.
In fact, the Fox News Poll has him up the highest at +7!
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls … html#polls
by Mike Russo3 years ago
Read this article from the NY Times. It's about a well planned, highly funded conspiracy to shutdown the government if Obama Care is not defunded. Please share this with everybody you know. The...
by fishskinfreak20087 years ago
Web-site/URL: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_health_care_overhaulWhen was the last time A POLITICIAN kept a promise?
by IslandBites4 years ago
What now? House republicans said they will do their own reform. But, there is division about the issue, specially after some republicans voted to passed it in the Senate. Do you think the bill will not pass? Do you...
by Jack Lee4 months ago
What is your opinion?In my humble opinion, these few GOP senators that is blocking the bill, are miss guided.Even if the bill is not perfectly worded, they should pass it. That way, the whole system can be revisited.How...
by fishskinfreak20087 years ago
Can they do it? Will they do it? WE HOPE SO, but the POLITICAL GAMES are likely to continue for quite some time
by Quilligrapher5 years ago
Congress and the President still intend to deprive American citizens of their Constitutional right to a trial by jury."National Defense Authorization Act: House And Senate Negotiators Agree On Bill Hoping To Avoid...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.