By Alan Boyle
U.S. Rep. Paul Broun's view that the theories of evolution and the big bang are "lies straight from the pit of Hell" is getting more exposure than he might have expected, thanks to a video that was made at a church-sponsored banquet in Georgia and distributed by a progressive political watchdog group.
The Georgia Republican is already well-known as an outspoken conservative Christian, due in part to his unsuccessful campaign to have 2010 declared "the Year of the Bible." But the latest comments have taken on an extra dab of controversy because Broun, a medical doctor, calls himself a scientist in the video and chairs the House Science Committee's panel on investigations and oversight.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl … ikEWuBrkHc
http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2012 … -hell?lite
Evolution is not recognized by this man -a representative in congress. I guess he is entitled to his private opinions
Well, it is from the "Pit of Hell", in the sense that the theory of evolution is one of the most complicated belief systems ever invented by man.
Yes, they use big, scary words like "biology" and "DNA". It's not so complicated once you pass beyond 7th grade.
Do you teach that bullshit in 7th grade? Quit Samaritan, you can't hang, go troll a whinne Christian
Once you pass beyond a certain age, brother Charley, you actually learn how much bullshit that theory actually is.
It's scary he is chairing a committee; however, our democracy never claimed it would ensure that idiots would be kept out of government. It only posits that the population will be well represented. The question is: is he representing his population?
He indeed does represent.
National Christian Populations: US - 246,780,000 (79.5% of the Population)
http://christianity.about.com/od/denomi … ntoday.htm
Precisely. Voters who believe in preliterate balderdash are not likely to elect a representative that will promote critical thinking and scientific advancement.
Right on! They will learn, sooner or later. Let them be as they are. Why bother?
Let them be? I guess that strategy is how we should treat racists and homophobes also. Being filled to the brim with untruths must be combated in the realm of ideas, and we cannot simply hope that attrition wins the day.
Public relations campaigns, public debates, and books should/are written about this topic.
This is a weakness of democracy though, that there is nothing that can be done without changing people's hearts and minds.
A medical doctor is referring to himself as a scientist...now that's a stretch. he is in a position of authority and abusing it. yes?
His training in his human anatomy and the effects of drugs on it, not in the history of the human species. His authority doesn't magically transfer over.
But even if being a medical doctor qualified one to speak authoritatively about evolution, this guy would still be wrong.
You do realize that Darwin first studied to be a doctor, right? Or was it his training as a naturalist or geologist that makes him qualified (in your opinion) to have studied and written about the theory of evolution?
I didn't say the doctor was unqualified based on any other aspect of his training, just based on him being a physician. Why do you always erect straw man arguments? He could have studied outside of being an M.D., and have valid criticisms of evolution, but it's unlikely.
Most religious folk tend to do that though, and that's why the scientific community looks upon their "criticisms" of evolution with such disdain. I'm no longer surprised when anti-intellectualism is touted as a virtue.
I wasn't replying to you, Okie. I was asking a question to Stacie; as I have proven with you before, your inability to read and discuss issues in a forum setting is piss-poor. Go have fun with your straw man somewhere else.
This stale, paranoid, mentally lazy throwback is allowed to sit on the House Science Committee's panel on investigations and oversight?! When is this madness ever going to end? Sometimes I think we'll never get past the Scopes monkey trial and pre-WWII fundamentalist mind sets - and we won't as long as we accept these people in positions of responsibility.
You're free to save your country, and your world, dear Samaritan. Quit attacking invisible people here, and do some real work. Talk is cheap. Make a difference. Be as hard as stone
@Healthy Pursuits-Unfortunately this is going to be a long process especially in the bible belt states where education rates at the bottom of the pile and there's practaclly one church for everty 10 people.
Peer review only determines a paper's worthiness to be published; it has nothing to do with measuring the validity of the paper's content. Additionally, a new study - and most likely peer-reviewed article, for what its worth - indicates high levels of fraud in retracted papers. In short, peer review is not some panacea for your argument, though it might sound good.
"Worthiness to be published" has a lot to do with "validity of content." And retractions are still quite rare.
It's also worth mentioning that the study you reference was limited to bio-medical research, arguably the most commercialized field of research.
The scary part of all this is the position Houn holds: chair of a House Science Committee. If this is representative government in action, no wonder Plato placed democracy down the list of preferred forms of social control. Not to worry, Doc. The naysayers are like autumn's leaves. The flare up briefly then fall into Nature's compost heap.
Maybe so, huckelbury. But I hear Broun is running unopposed, so we're stuck with him for four more years. Besides, I live in Georgia, so he's mildly embarrassing to me on that account.
Are there any Democrats in Georgia? At least boot this clown off the chair of House Science Comittee. A sock puppet would be more acceptable!
Oh, sure, there are Democrats in Georgia. Even in the Georgia Congressional delegation. About 40-45% of the population votes Democrat, IIRC.
As to booting Congressman Broun, if it were up to me it would have happened already. I don't mind his religion per se, but we don't need legislators who are not in good touch with scientific realities. This world is what it is, not what it was thought to be in ancient Judea--though Heaven may be another story.
I can only imagine that , hes on the Science Comittee just to "manage" and oppose it.
by Jack Lee 22 months ago
Should Congress Indict IRS Commissioner Koskinen with impeachment?The IRS scandal seems a million miles away. Data was destroyed and the Commissioner lied to Congress. What should be done to this public servant?
by JeniferD 7 years ago
I ask this because since the U.S. congress makes six figures a year doing essentially NOTHING for the people that voted them in and THEN denies the unemployed extended comps calling the unemployed 'lazy'. Any jobs that paid a living wage in my state went overseas to cheap foreign labor...
by M. T. Dremer 4 months ago
Do you believe non-religious people, who lead a good life, are still going to hell?One of my biggest frustrations with religion is the idea that, how you live your life is of no consequence if you do not accept god. For example, John Smith is a good christian man who helps people, obeys the law and...
by Sychophantastic 18 months ago
You remember Benghazi, right?Four brave Americans died in an attack that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was responsible for. Prior to the election, investigations were closing in on hard evidence that was going to put Hillary Clinton in jail. Now, after the election, not a peep about where...
by Castlepaloma 2 days ago
Is Religion an addiction?When battling addictions to common vices like alcohol, drugs or sex, we think, “If only we could get addicted to something good.”Even a positive addiction in any form can throws you off the balance too. Better for everything in moderation.Is being a little...
by Deforest 3 years ago
US – Russia relations have deteriorated severely in the past decade and they are about to get worse, if the House passes H. Res. 758.NATO encirclement, the US-backed coup in Ukraine, an attempt to use an agreement with the European Union to bring NATO into Ukraine at the Russian border, a US...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|