http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/0 … f=politics
"He believes in socialism, in redistributing, in confiscating hard-earned dollars of our small businessmen and women so that they cannot re-invest their dollars and hire more people and grow and expand."
Okay, so according to her definition of socialism, ANY redistribution of income is socialistic. Does this mean EVERY welfare program is socialism? Or that police, firefighters, and...the military! are the result of socialism? These are all funded with taxes.
Most conservatives agree in a safety net; they just disagree with liberals over its size. Most conservatives are also in favor of police and firefighters, and the military being paid for with tax dollars. (Find me a conservative who is willing to call the military socialist). Does this mean that most people in the United States are secretly socialist!??!?
Palin is an ignorant mouthbreather. Obama is a centrist, not even a liberal Democrat. She whines about "redistribution" and fails to recognize that there has been a huge redistribution from the middle class and poor to the richest Americans since the late 1970s.
Hogwash , The only redistributing that has happened is that more American people are existing :"on the system" than ever before ! There is more buss. than ever in this countrry , more money ,and more success stories ! Every other person I meet is on SS, disability , a pension from the gov. or welfare , that is where your Redistribution has gone ! Palin would have done better in tha last four years ! Than Obama will in eight !
I think this may be due to the fact we just suffered the worst recession since the great depression,so 15% of the population is beloe poverty level and the baby boomers are aging through the system and drawing the checks they have earned..."Palin would have done better" LMAO
"Every other person I meet is on SS, disability , a pension from the gov. or welfare , that is where your Redistribution has gone ! "
You should read up a bit on the redistribution of income and wealth that's occurred in this country since 1977.
Hey, Ralph, you're adding too much realism and solid facts to this discussion! But what is astounding about the facts you cite is that most people don't seem to care that their real income--in terms of what they can buy--has not gone up in 30 years; but the actually production per hour that they put out has doubled. And the wealth and income of the wealthy has doubled in those same 30 years. That is redistribution upwards--the trickle up theory is for real.
Also, I think the fact that 50% of American household do not have $1000 to cover an emergency is telling. They'd have to borrow or end up on the street (or whatever the case is).
Palin is a useless ex politician who clings to her fifteen minutes by lying through her teeth. It's time to make the Tea Party a dormant part of politics.
The vast majority of the 1928 platform of the United States' Socialist Party has been adopted and are programs supported most vehemently by leftists. Obama wants to expand the role of the government even further. So what if he isn't a purist? Other than Ron Paul, who is a purist Republican/conservative? By the logic of "Obama's not a socialist because he isn't a devoted ideologue," then are Mitt Romney and Sarah Palin not conservatives because they aren't as hardline as Ron Paul? No, of course not.
http://butnowyouknow.net/those-who-fail … -platform/
Do you know what socialism is? Your entire reply leads me to believe you don't, but you could prove me wrong and I could simply be misunderstanding you.
Then use that herd of cows to produce milk, corner the market, raise the prices, and get rich while the rest of the people work their tails off to buy a glass of milk a day to split between 4,
Ah, those who deal in soundbites but cannot engage in philosophical discourse. It's quite amusing really.
Actually it just gets so tiresome to hear Socialists tell others they don't know what it is that I came up with an answer.
If you have lived as long as I have you have seen all these "ism's" in action and all that do you know what the definition is stuff is for the young when you are trying to confuse them.
Palin provides evidence that Fox "News" learned absolutely nothing from its face-plant on election day as they're still allowing her air time.
They keep her for ratings. I think she is going to run for president!
You ARE kidding about the president thing aren't you?! No way would the Repubs be dumb enough to let her run?! Probably should never say never.
See they're already talking about 2016 - yawn . . .
I've seen the dems talking about hilary running in 2016, and the republican party is wide open!
Who else is gonna run? John Huntsman, Rick Santorum, Nikki Haley, Sarah Palin, and Mike Huckabee.
Like to see Warren run . . . don't trust Hillary.
Just watched them talking about Paul Ryan (can't stand him either!) and Rubio being the new up and comers for the Repubs.
Who knows - four years is forever in politics . . .
Palin is incapable running a hotdog stand let alone this country. She's nothing but a cruel joke, but she does provide valuable materials for the late night comedians.
2016 will be a very interesting election. The field is wide open on both sides. Dems you have Hillary, Julian Castro, Deval Patrick, Lizzy Warren, and maybe Cory Booker. Repubs you have Rubio, Bachman, Perry, Huntsman, Ryan, Santorum, Rand Paul, and possibly Mia Love. I think the best candidates would be Castro v Santorum. We'll start to see the hats being thrown in the arena late next year.
For Republicans, I don't think that list is what I'd go with. Huntsman is even more liberal than McCain, and the conservative base hates McCain Santorum's insistence on talking about regulating birth control hurt the party -- I can't see him getting much support. Perry's bumbling entrence and exit means he wont be back.
Rubio's appeal is mostly because he's Hispanic. I'd say Christie, McDonnell, and Walker all have the necessary profile and ease on the podium to pull off the nomination. Kelly Ayotte (especially if Christie is the nominee), Nikki Haley, and Bobby Jindal are all in an excellent position to pick up the VP nod.
Mia Love will win a Senate seat soon and by 2020 or 2024 be in a good position to take a spot in an administration, maybe even get a VP nod, but for 2016, I don't think she's looking for a national election.
I don't know why I wanted to see this thread. Maybe I was hoping that Palin had a press conference to finally say that she was the reason that McCain did not become president. It's the truth. And, if she does run for President, I hope she gets squashed like a bug.
Whats the point?
Palin , Obama , whats the difference , the best answer yet is above , " Late night comedy shows " thats where the average American gets their insight for politics , Oh , and the "American Idol "political process ! The average American [above answers included] wouldn't know a candidate from a candy cane!
I've often wondered if Palin was a major reason for McCain's poor showing. I liked her before I learned more about her. It amazes me that so many people are still enthralled by her.
I saw a poll on CNN right after the 2008 election about why people voted for McCain and why they voted for Obama, and I wish I could find it again, because that particular poll had a small percentage of people voting for Obama because they didn't like Palin, and McCain's age made them wonder what would happen if he were to die.
I don't think she had that much of an impact on the overall election. I was engaging in a bit of hyperbole, because she generally tends to say stupid things. She wasn't always like this in Alaska, but ever since she became a national figure, she has transformed.
Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! You just won the grand prize. Being correct.
One of the main reason's a lot of republican's that I know did not vote for McCain, was the "What happens if he dies?" The idea of Sarah Palin being president scared the hell out of them. They say if McCain had chosen a better running mate, they may have voted for him. A lot of people who usually vote straight ticket, did not vote, or voted for Obama, so that there would be no chance of a Palin President.
I think yes, Palin was part of the reason McCain had such a poor showing.
I remember back in the run-up to the y2k election, I was really hoping John McCain would get the GOP nod. But he got Roved: W's machine called around with polls that had questions like "Would you vote for McCain if you knew he'd collaborated with his North Vietnamese captors in exchange for better treatment?" Several friends of mine believed he'd sold out his fellow POWs and wouldn't vote for him.
But by 2008, he'd fallen from grace. He picked Palin as his running mate, or else had her foisted on him. Both are bad: either he has incredibly bad judgement or he's not a strong enough leader (anymore). It's sad, because y2k McCain would have made a better president than W did (or Gore would have). '08 McCain, however, was a shadow of y2k McCain.
I think the antics of McCain's supporters was another major factor in his loss. Do you remember the campaign event where this older lady got up and grabbed the mic and proclaimed that Obama was a secret Muslim who wants to destroy America from within, and poor McCain had to say "No, he's not--he's a good man, but one with whom I disagree on a lot of issues..." (a paraphrase)
You could see it in his eyes--he knew the radical right-wing machine had run away with his campaign, and there was nothing he could do about it.
Reminds me of a quote from Robespierre: "There go the people, and I must follow, for I am their leader."
Sarah Palin was the only prayer John McCain ever even had of being elected.
And that ! Is the problem , John Macain is a national hero , Not many people seem to have followed his life at all ! Especially those who chose candidates on methods of fairy tails ! Most of the left unfortunately ! A little advice .....read his life history and then go say a prayer for the patriots who do protect your rights to vote for whoever you do !
by Scott Belford 2 years ago
Many people who call themselves Conservatives, IMO, aren't. Many people who Conservatives call Socialists, aren't. In studying politics, I ran across a couple of lectures which identified what the professor called minimal-state liberals (Libertarians) and active-state liberals (modern...
by Jack Lee 3 years ago
Now he tells us...Normally, I would not attack someone when they are down especially with terminal illness.However, this is just self serving grand standing.What is wrong with someone who is so full of himself?If it wasn't for Sarah Palin, he would have lost even bigger in the 2008 election.It was...
by hubby7 13 years ago
What does everybody think about John McCain choice of Sarah Pahlin as his Vice Presidential pick?My feeling is that she might be a bit too parochial with too little experience. That my feeling. However, I admit I don't know much about her right now. Does anyone? Perhaps upon learning more about...
by Josh Ratzburg 6 years ago
Why are we so afraid of Democratic Socialism?
by Charles James 10 years ago
As some fellow hubbers will know, I am involved in writing hubs for a Socialism 101 series.There are a few issues raised by the conservatives where I do not fully understand what they are saying. Before I address these in a hub or hubs I really would like clarity on what exactly the conservative...
by James Smith 8 years ago
Hans-Hermann Hoppe in A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism essentially argues that there are in fact only 2 possible economic ideologies: Socialism and Capitalism, and variations of. You either believe there should be aggressive intervention in the economy or you do not.Since Republicans are...
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|