Now what? In another episode of the ongoing struggle to implement Obamacare - another unfavorable court ruling, (for the Obama administration), is just one more hurdle - to be jumped or circumvented.
The gist of the topic: A DC Appeals Court has ruled that subsidies granted through the Federal Health Exchange were not covered by the subsidies provisions of the ACA. The court ruled that the healthcare law only authorized premium subsidies for plans purchased through state exchanges.... Oops....
For more details, here is a topic search, you can pick your poison as to which news story to believe. Court Overturns Obamacare Federal Premium Subsidies
Of course this issue will almost certainly wind its way to the Supreme court, but there are probably a couple things that are safe to assume;
1. Nobody is going to push for repayment of Federal Exchange subsidies already granted and paid.
2. The administration will continue with business as usual and the Republicans will be scrambling to make hay from this Gotcha!
So... what should be done to correct this legislative Oops!
I say, the intent of the law was clear - offer subsidies to all that qualified, but I would bet that it was worded the way it was for some financial PR reason to make the law look less costly than it really is. And that gimmick appears to have bitten the Dems on the butt!
I also say - the Republicans will make a big mistake using this technical illegality to further obstruct the laws implementation - it will be citizens that get hurt and pissed-off - not politicians!
ps. I am against Obamacare as passed, but I am also against pure political maneuvers that leaves citizens in the ditch.
And I further say, the legislators should pass a fix to the problem with the law's wording - get the citizens out of a hostage situation, and then fight it out, pro or con, by whatever direction, means, or methods that were being pursued prior to this revelation.
Just publicizing the real reason for the wording used should give Republicans enough fuel to continue their fight.
What say you?
"ps. I am against Obamacare as passed, but I am also against pure political maneuvers that leaves citizens in the ditch."
EXACTLY!! I am so sick of political maneuvering by either party to modify, change, repeal etc. what the other party did I could puke. The ONLY thing that group of idiots knows is party politics as the rule of the game.
Plus, I agree with the rest of your post, too.
Of course, the main reason for this is political gamesmanship, the concern of the people are at the very bottom of the list. Republicans and Democrats are doing the political tango; ultimately it is the people who will suffer in the end. Well, that's nothing new and par for the course as far as Washington D.C. politics go.
If the GOP were smart (and for some of their ranks, that is highly suspect) they'd get ahead of this now. Pass their own version of a fix while making it clear that the original wording was to hide the real cost of these subsidies.
Leapfrog Dems at their own game.
That was my point too. I think there is a valid point o be made by asking the Dems to explain to the American public just why such a carefully crafted act could contain such a boneheaded mistake - if it wasn't for the purpose of hiding costs.
by Scott S Bateman 14 months ago
The White House just announced that Trump is killing subsidies to insurance companies for individual policies that keep prices down.Low-income people who get tax credits because of their lower income won't be affected. Higher income people who buy individual policies because they are retired or...
by Person of Interest 6 years ago
"Republicans and Democrats are girding for a politically explosive week as the Supreme Court prepares to rule as early as Monday on the federal health care overhaul."http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06 … care-case/Seems to me that the 10th amendment all by itself invalidates...
by My Esoteric 4 years ago
When the Robert's Court, while upholding the most important part of Obamacare, struck down the the penalty to any State not buying into the expanded Medicaid program, they condemned millions of somewhat poor Americans to no chance at healthcare at all unless they move. That is because States...
by Marisaupa 6 years ago
Conservatives, how do you feel about Chief Justice Roberts siding in favor of upholding ObamaCare?In what can only be characterized as a victory for the Obama administration, the Supreme Court handed down a 5-4 decision which basically upholds the The Affordable Care Act. Chief Justice...
by Lizzie Edenfield 5 years ago
Who is the one to blame for the shutdown? GOP, the Republicans or President Obama?
by Prakash RnP 5 years ago
Are you for or against the Republican stance on the project Obamacare?I don't approve of the Republican stance in regard to what is known as Obamacare on the following grounds. 1. I think the project Obamacare is meant for the well-being of the American people.2. The Republicans have to date failed...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|