"Affluenza" -- Poor parenting a viable legal defense?

Jump to Last Post 1-6 of 6 discussions (26 posts)
  1. kbdressman profile image93
    kbdressmanposted 2 years ago

    Ethan Couch was sentenced to 10 years probation and treatment after drinking and causing an accident that killed four people.  His lawyers said Couch suffered from "affluenza," a condition that resulted from having grown up with rich parents and not ever having had limits set for him. 

    Is there a place for "affluenza" to be a legitimate defense?  Was this it?  Even if "affluenza" was to blame, was the judge's sentence appropriate?  Or, did his sentence allow him to shift the blame for his bad behavior to someone else, and cause further damage?   

    (To see the latest in Ethan's case:  http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Police … B_DFWBrand )

    1. Learn Things Web profile image91
      Learn Things Webposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      It doesn't make sense to me. If you were raised by parents who did set limits but you drove drunk and killed people you would go to jail but if you were raised by parents who didn't set limits you'd get probation? How is that even fair? I'm sure too that most people who suffer from "affluenza" will never kill anyone.

      1. kbdressman profile image93
        kbdressmanposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        You bring up good points.  Isn't lightening the sentence just continuing the problem?  "Oh, you've never had a consequence before, so you don't know right and wrong.  It'd be mean to give you a consequence...."

        It also makes me question what the purpose of the legal system is.  This sentence won't rehabilitate this individual.  This sentence doesn't bring closure to the families of the victim.  This sentence doesn't keep the perpetrator off the streets....what does it do?

    2. Credence2 profile image80
      Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Affluenza? that is not a defense, but an excuse.

      The sentence is appropriate, we have to crack down on drunk drivers. Driving under the influence is premeditation in the commission of vehicle homicide in my opinion.

      1. kbdressman profile image93
        kbdressmanposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        Just to make sure I understand, you think only 10 years probation is sufficient for this situation?  And therefore, 10 years probation is sufficient for 4 counts of premeditated vehicular homicide?

        1. Credence2 profile image80
          Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

          This is a first time offense and it magnitude would make one desire that the penalty by greater. The system accomodates this sort of offense with lower sentencing because it is not considered premeditated, like deliberately shooting someone.

          I am not saying that this is good or bad, but that how it has been done. I have to take into consideration the fact that the perp was a minor at the time the crime was committed.

          I could be wrong, without detail study of the nature of similar cases like it.

          So, what do you think that the sentence should be? Should he be forced to have done time in juvie and after reaching the age of majority continue his sentence there? How many years in the klink do you think are appropriate?

    3. rhamson profile image77
      rhamsonposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      The only good that can come from this at this point is that he will be found and sent back to jail....hopefully? But what is even better is that I understand his mother is on the run with him. Now she can join him in aiding and abetting a wanted fugitive.

      1. kbdressman profile image93
        kbdressmanposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        Exactly, rhamson!  If someone can use afluenza as a defense, shouldn't it have also been used as an offense on why the parents should be partially responsible for the 4 deaths?  It seems like we shouldn't have one without the other.

    4. Live to Learn profile image77
      Live to Learnposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      "Nowhere in this process did Ethan ever say to the families, to the court, 'I'm so sorry for what happened,'" said Boyles. "Nowhere did Ethan express any remorse or anything."

      That, to me, is why the answer is no. The sentence was not appropriate. Many times, when a person causes harm to another they will punish themselves worse by their own guilt than any punishment the courts could ever impose. Here we have a case where a rich kid kills others and the defense is, poor him it's not his fault because he led a privileged life? I think the court simply allowed him to believe his lack of consideration was justified.  I think his subsequent actions are evidence of how inappropriate the sentence was.

      Texas is a strange state. They'll execute anyone for any infraction then they acquit a rich guy who kills someone and stuffs them into a suitcase and pat a teen on the hand telling him it isn't his fault  he killed four people because he's rich.  I suppose it pays to be rich in Texas.

      1. Credence2 profile image80
        Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

        Texas sucks, let me count the ways!!

      2. kbdressman profile image93
        kbdressmanposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        Leaves one to question what the point of the judicial system is, doesn't it?  The kid didn't learn, the families didn't get either an apology or justice, the kid was still on the streets where he could hurt someone else...what was accomplished in this case? I think you're exactly right, Live to Learn.  You make a good point.

  2. profile image0
    ahorsebackposted 2 years ago

    Whether it's a legal defense or not , its a  true plague in America ,     Be proud though , you hit on something here !       If I were to have tried to invent a viable defense for a crime , this would be todays  perfection .

    1. kbdressman profile image93
      kbdressmanposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      I agree it's a problem.  It's interesting to see how we define delinquency.  We don't want to punish people for biological, mental and social factors beyond their control, but there has to be a line somewhere between not punishing people for outside factors and not taking care of delinquency at all!

      1. Credence2 profile image80
        Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

        I can't believe you guys, there have been serial killers and loathsome murderers that have been executed and most certainly many have had difficult childhood experience. They all went to the gallows, abusive parents or no. Why are we even entertaining this idea? I am not giving any consideration to the plight of this person just because he was pampered too much growing up and gagged on his silver spoon!!!

        1. kbdressman profile image93
          kbdressmanposted 2 years agoin reply to this

          Credence2, I didn't say I agreed with the judge's choice.  I think that there may have been a parenting issue here, I don't, however, think that that parenting issue gives this kid the right to kill 4 people and not have consequences.

          1. Credence2 profile image80
            Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

            Understood, KB, but there is never a parenting issue to consider if the perpetrator is at the age of majority at time the crime is committed. I just don't see it as a consideration in prosecution or sentencing at any level.

            I am sorry, was this fellow only 16? If thats the case, the circumstances change, as a minor, he is entitled to some leniency. I don't know how that would be measured or what is should be. His parents are accessories to the crime and should be made to pay some sort of damages to the aggrieved families involved. Parents must assume responsibility for their minor children.

            1. kbdressman profile image93
              kbdressmanposted 2 years agoin reply to this

              He was only 16 at the time of the accident.  Now that he's violated his probation he's 18, which is why some are calling for this case to be moved to adult court.

              Should a 16 year old be able to put his mistake on his parents?  And, if they can be held responsible enough for his actions for him to get out of a jail sentence, then should they be facing legal charges as well?

              1. Credence2 profile image80
                Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

                Yes, since he has violated the terms of his probation, I believe now that he is 18 that his case should go to an adult court. He had a chance to stay clean while he was in the less severe juvenile system, but he blew it.

                No, the 16 year old is not completely absolved of responsibility for his actions and should be punished independently. Yes, as I said before the parents are accessories. The issuance of minor driver's licenses presumes parental responsiblity and subsequent liability for the action of the teen driver.

  3. Live to Learn profile image77
    Live to Learnposted 2 years ago

    This whole thing seems so indicative of what is wrong in America today. Too much money is cause for us to coddle defendants and attempt to convince ourselves they haven't done anything wrong; too little money is cause for us to shove people in prison and think suspected criminals who are poor have no reason for us to be concerned if they die in the hands of the police.

    Money. It certainly turns our heads. Or, maybe it's just a case of too many lawyers grubbing for money.

    1. rhamson profile image77
      rhamsonposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Money is one way we are all equal in this society. If you have it does not matter if you are black or white. Look at O.J. as an example of enough money to beat a historically heinous crime of black on white crime. He was able to beat a stereotypical death warrant with it.

  4. LauraD093 profile image84
    LauraD093posted 2 years ago

    I can remember this case back when it was a big news story. It was a ridiculous defense-but it worked. Shows the climate in our society where having money and being excused for the death of 4 people by poor parenting is an acceptable norm. Wow he screwed up yet again (although murdering 4 people goes beyond screwing up in my estimation) and a video leaked and once again it is a big story and taxpayers will foot the bill for searching for him. I'm so surprised!  This little wack-job should have been imprisoned-I wonder what the woman's defense will be who recently killed a woman in Vegas and injured 35-(three seriously?) Will it be "Non-Affluenza?" Give me a break!

    1. kbdressman profile image93
      kbdressmanposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      You bring up an interesting point with "non-affluenza."  "I wanted it and I didn't have it" would suddenly be an acceptable defense for theft.  And at that point....we'd have a free for all.

      One of the purposes of the US justice system is to correct problems and rehabilitate people.  CLEARLY that wasn't accomplished.  Even if affluenza was acceptable, shouldn't there have been mandatory counseling, coursework, LOADS of community service, etc?  And, if affluenza is the problem....doesn't that mean the mom is guilty? 

      There were LOTS of loop holes in this ruling and defense, imho!

    2. rhamson profile image77
      rhamsonposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      It is the epitome of the "it's not my fault" generations we are raising. Shame on us for this travesty.

  5. Stacie L profile image91
    Stacie Lposted 2 years ago

    Well since he disappeared with his mother to Mexico, he has shown his true colors.
    The Mexican authorities are sending them back to the states and I hope some new judge will do the right thing!
    Both need to spend some time paying for the death of four innocent lives and not using their money and influence to avoid punishment.

    1. kbdressman profile image93
      kbdressmanposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      I'm glad extradition is happening! Running to Mexico did prove the previous defense attorney's point that the mother has no moral compass, sense of justice, or ability to live with the consequences of her actions.  And, it's probably pretty hard for someone with no moral compass to teach someone else how to use one.  However, I completely agree with you that that doesn't excuse the fact that 4 people died.  Death has consequences, whether we're accustomed to facing them or not!

      But....since the kid has had no opportunities to learn accountability, lets absolve him of any consequences for this choice too!  Good job, judge and jury.  Way to perpetuate the problem!

  6. promisem profile image98
    promisemposted 2 years ago

    Based on what I read about the parents, they really weren't that rich. Affluenza was the silly invention of their lawyer to get their son freed.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)