Such nerve, gut the most important aspects of Obamacare for the general public but keep the sweet stuff for Congress and their staffers?
This is another dirty Republican trick for which the Democrats are calling them to account. So, I guess that what is good for the goose is not good for the gander, huh?
The fact that the GOP leadership in Congress could ever let such thoughts see the light of day is quite telling about them and who they REALLY represent.
Pretty mainstream source, so no excuses about fake news stuff, OK?
I do give Rep. McArthur credit for going into the lion's den to call the GOP leadership's attention to how their stupid ploy is going to play with the general public.
Please see article attached for background.
http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/33 … f-congress
I think this has changed Credence2, not the fact that the amendment wasn't originally there, (your initial thought is correct - a dumb trick), but the fact that the sunshine forced its removal.
The reads I recall say that Congress will now have the same plan(s) as available to the public.
Probably introduced into the original language as a sop to get Democrats on board, don't you think? At least the only people trying to get it changed are all Republicans...
After reading the article, it seems to me that they have the GOP's reason for originally putting that option in there wrong. It probably wasn't because they thought the new plan was too bad to keep; but because the conservatives (ie., Freedom Caucus) want a full repeal of Ocare and they probably can't have that.
So this was probably a concession added so that uber-conservatives would have more good reasons to support it - kind of like all the silly agreements that were made at the end before Ocare came to be. Having absolutely no national healthcare policy is what they want; and they would LIKE that to be the case for everyone.
Twisted 'not quite fake' news to make people think the GOP are being irresponsible when they're probably just being like the Dems - and that is normal.
This I can go with. Although the basic policies are different, when it comes to their personal gain they are identical.
I will give Misfit Chick a +1 on that, too. Simply put is always good.
Thank you both... The next time someone calls me a snowflake or a liberal, I just may send them to this link, ha!
The majority of us are trying to drive in the middle lane because we know both sides are tainted - and neither is tainted more than the other. They both need to be cleaned up and we're working on it. But, we get nowhere fast with the divisions they insist on using to stir up chaos among us.
I really do want this country and President Trump to succeed as much as you do - even if we have different ideas. Diversity makes us strong as long as one extreme or the other is not being forced upon us. I totally believe that.
by Jack Lee 2 weeks ago
The latest call for a new FBI investigation on Judge Kavanauh for something that happened 35 years ago in high school is just insane. If this is the new standard, I want all Senators and Congressmen undergoes the same scrutiny. Would any one these 535 people pass this test? The arguement that a...
by Abecedarian 7 years ago
Why is it that Tea Party type hubs won't post comments from anyone that doesn't see things their...way? Everytime I got to a right wing conservative hub and make a valid arguement about a topic, they won't post my comment. It's like a love fest on those sights, surely not everyone on this site is a...
by My Esoteric 19 months ago
I'll let you answer that but provide this insight from a recent CNN poll. Q16. If you had to choose, would you rather see Donald Trump and the Republicans in Congress mostlyimplement Republican policies and pay little attention to the positions taken by the Democraticleaders in Congress, or...
by ahorseback 19 months ago
Ultra-libs are actually not only calling for but, actively bringing " Blood into the Streets " politics to America's main streets , It has arrived ! Loretta Lynch, ex- Attorney General of The United States , is calling for all this to...
by rhamson 3 years ago
"money absolutely can be speech." Ted Cruz stated when being asked about campaign donations. So does that mean that one persons donation can rise over party and PAC's when deciding issues and candidates?
by Stacie L 3 years ago
Deal reached to allow pension plans to cut benefitsA bipartisan group of congressional leaders reached a deal Tuesday evening that would for the first time allow the benefits of current retirees to be severely cut, part of an effort to save some of the nation’s most distressed pension plans.The...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|