Anyone got any info on the DNC Fraud Lawsuit?
Cant find a thing on msm..
Case 0:16-cv-61511-WJZ Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2017
* http://jampac.us/wp-content/uploads/201 … 6-1-17.pdf
Jampac - DNC Fraud and Collusion
I do hope Bernie supporters are refunded the donations they made because I believe they were frauded. The most important thing is that the DNC has been exposed. The more that can be exposed about the Deep State players ... all the better.
I DNC's arguments in court are ridiculously totalitarian. Basically, they believe they can defraud people and take their money, and they can decide who they want to pick as their nominee and the hell with the stupid voters who think their vote counts. Regardless of what their charter states.
Let them change the rules way before a campaign and election and put people on notice that the rules have changed and their vote isn't going to count, but please send money anyway.
I am having pdf issues. Is there some msm story out there somewhere with the case already posted? i search and no msm story on it. All the big stories cannot be of the magnitude and seriousness of CovfefeGate, but surely there is something out there..somewhere.
I haven't seen it transcribed other then on PDF.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/dnc-a … le/2621767
The transcription of the April 25 hearing quotes Spiva as follows:
"[i]f you had a charity where somebody said, Hey, I'm gonna take this money and use it for a specific purpose, X, and they pocketed it and stole the money, of course that's different. But here, where you have a party that's saying, We're gonna, you know, choose our standard bearer, and we're gonna follow these general rules of the road, which we are voluntarily deciding, we could have — and we could have voluntarily decided that, Look, we're gonna go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way. That's not the way it was done. But they could have. And that would have also been their right, and it would drag the Court well into party politics, internal party politics to answer those questions."
This isn't the only law suit against the DNC.
Im thinking the DNC might want it to go away. The case could dig into voter data. MSM might go from quiet as a church mouse to torches and pitchforks. Even more pitchforks than normal that is.
Sure, I can see that happening. Anything to distract from the real issues.
The story of today should be, and is in the real world, the Obama Administration's spying on and unmasking of thousands of privet citizens, including Donald Trump. Nunes issued subpoenas to the CIA, FBI and the NSA for questioning, Susan Rice and I don't remember who else for now. Oh, Flynn and Cohen.
They need to subpoena Obama eventually. The FISA Court ruled on the evidence that he broke the law. Wanted,...!
I think it a matter of time before someone like Dirty Donna takes a long ride under the DNC short bus or some professional confessors appear.
I ran across this video discussing "Democrats Argue Their RIGHT to Keep Rigging Elections!" I listened to it about a week ago. With Attorney Jared Beck and Stefan Molyneux. Its enlightening.
"Debbie Wasserman Schultz Uses Voice Changer To Call Law Firm Suing DNC - Forgets To Disable Caller ID"
* http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-0 … s-disable-
Is Debbie going to keep on digging that hole deeper?
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.