With more circumstantial evidence favour election fraud, is Hilary possibly the

1. 56

   peter565posted 8 years ago

   With more circumstantial evidence favour election fraud, is Hilary possibly the real President elect

   replyreport
2. 76

   Oztinatoposted 8 years ago

   Yes it is more than likely that she is.
   The FBI man in charge of making sure there was no hacking was JAMES COMEY (pronounced Commie)!! His behaviour was atrociously biased against Clinton as the whole world saw. Donald's inside man making sure there were no hacks? Really?
   http://hubpages.com/politics/answer/272 … on-results

   replyreport
   1. 56

      peter565posted 8 years agoin reply to this

      To best of my knowledge US is the only nation that use electronic voting, all other nations use tradition paper ballot, which I think, is better, because traditional ballot can't be hack.

      replyreport
   2. 59

      Dont Taze Me Broposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Oztinato, the real president is only elected by the electoral vote or didn't you know that no election fraud will change those results.

      replyreport
   3. 88

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      no, but it will prove your boy got there like he did everything else: handed to him on a silver spoon. not earned, not deserved.

      replyreport
   4. 76

      Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Taze
      Not sure of your grammar. Legal challenges are more complex than you might think.

      replyreport
   5. 88

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      now palast has reached national media.he says forget putin,its simple removing voters from rolls,and padding.4 precincts in wisconsin found with more votes than people exist. always favoring trump. good thing he told us: its rigged! and dont accept!

      replyreport
3. 88

   lovemychrisposted 8 years ago

   yes, i would say there is no question. and its a travesty that so many people are sacrificed for what? so an ideology wins time after time after time? no! she won more votes, and there are obvious shenanigans in the 3 states  needed to win. its beyond past time we stop putting up with this. and for those who dont believe russia hacked the dnc, i would ask you to take a look what they've done since ole donald got the nod.and ask yourself why only the dnc. and why no one seems to care that we were bombarded with private info obtained illegally. just what do you think would be in rnc emails? this election was stolen, out and out swindled. and its not the first time. if you havent heard, jill stein is raising the money to have the ballots counted. lets see if they let it happen. im sure theyre working on any means necessary to stop it. but lets see.

   replyreport
   1. 88

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      "youre telling me trump picked up 3 percentage points in solid blue states that he had an 85% chance of losing? it is statistically impossible without election fraud. mathematics never lies."

      replyreport
   2. 76

      Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      The law needs to be upheld. Proper procedure needs to occur. Donald has his  renergised KKK/ultra right wingers on stand by for violence if the laws of the land find fraud: ultra rights carry guns not placards, and Donald will be back on the coke.

      replyreport
   3. 88

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      yeah, like after obama won and let bushco off the hook, democrats may decide the alt right violence that will ensue may not be worth getting to the truth. truly, it is a gd civil war. this us why we should split: calexit.because it never changes

      replyreport
4. 69

   lisavollrathposted 8 years ago

   I just read that Jill Stein has raised enough money to fund the recount in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, so we might know soon whether the Trump win was legit, or the result of tampering.
   
   At this point, though, it would probably better for the country if the election results weren't found to be fraudulent. Not that Trump will ever be a good President, but the upheaval and resulting unrest of having his election invalidated at this late date would just be bad.

   replyreport
   1. 59

      Dont Taze Me Broposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      No surprise,Jill Stein is a liberal& liberals will waste other people's money on anything the can dupe them into spending their money on.She hasn't raised near the total cost likely to be $6-7 million.Bet what she raises never gets there

      replyreport
   2. 88

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      actually, a lot of liberals dont trust her...think shes up to something,given her relationship w putin. turns out putin hands in a lot of pies. stein and flynn sat at same table w him at rt celebration. my goodness!

      replyreport
   3. 76

      Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      It's urgently important for democracy to overturn undemocratic votes to protect the integrity of the process. Regardless of the consequences.

      replyreport
   4. 88

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      most definately. this just does not add up. at all. there is no way everybody was so wrong, or that trump won in bluest of blue states. its like someone pulled the rug, whoosh.

      replyreport
   5. 69

      lisavollrathposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Americans should welcome the opportunity to confirm that their votes were accurately counted, and that the election results are valid. And hey, it's being privately funded, so no tax dollars are involved. Republicans should love that...

      replyreport
   6. 88

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      stein hires bonifaz to help her. says the machines are hack prone. calls it a seriously hacked election.
      it is on. and hey-- all you stein fans can get on board. this is not ovah.

      replyreport
   7. 56

      peter565posted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Election should be done by paper ballot, not computer, paper ballot can't be hacked, like computers. Sometime old school technology is still the better option then new ones.

      replyreport
   8. 88

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      thats true. and now, with states investigating voting "irregularities", clintons lead is 2.23 million....and growing. if this is how we do elections, no wonder we're descending to third-world status. banana republicans, lol!! but not funny...:-(

      replyreport
   9. 59

      Yoda Speaksposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Jill Stein? Yeah, wake up, she's bilking liberal donors for millions in a last-ditch effort to steal the election for Hillary
      
      Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/056144_recou … z4RA49rhmo

      replyreport
   10. 88

       lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

       too late.trump already stole the election from hillary.sorry, when exit polls dont match votes, its shenanigans.we gonna find out how crooked gop is.their guile is backfiring.in fact, u could say trump is getting trumped! 2,000,000,028 and counting

       replyreport
5. 82

   tamarawilhiteposted 8 years ago

   No, since the Democrat party was proven to engage in vote fraud per the Wikileaks revelations and Project Veritas.
   The dead vote Democrat, illegal aliens and legal residents who don't have citizenship overwhelmingly vote Democrat, the Democratic party organized busing so minorities could vote more than once, encouraged people with several addresses (second homes, college students) to vote more than once.
   No, Clinton is not the real President. Trump won by a larger real margin than the media wants to admit.
   
   Vote Fraud Monitoring Group Says Three Million Noncitizens Voted in Presidential Election
   http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/im … l-election

   replyreport
   1. 59

      Dont Taze Me Broposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      The truth is,&everybody knows it,even the liberals who claim it isn't true (because liberal is synonymous with LIAR),the Democrats cheat,they cheated Bernie Sanders one of their own,&they are against voter IDs so that they can cheat

      replyreport
   2. 88

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      sanders is not a democrat...it was a political manuever for votes. we're against voter suppression, which is the only way tea party wins.

      replyreport
   3. 76

      Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      This is why I remind people about the law. It cuts through the post truth to the actual truth.

      replyreport
   4. 88

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      they dont care about truth, they dont care about law. they care about power. this should be patently obvious by now. and they never cease to let us know, should they not get their way: second amendment solutions

      replyreport
   5. 76

      Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Link to James Commie in charge of overseeing hacking.
      http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-ele … story.html

      replyreport
   6. 88

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      oh, he cant be the one to oversee...no way! and, since trump was so sure the election is rigged, and tea party says all the time dems cheat: all the more reason to be sure. after all, 2 million+ more votes is not just an "oh well". demand!

      replyreport
   7. 69

      lisavollrathposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      A recount will confirm that the results of the election are accurate, and that the legitimately elected candidate becomes President. If that's Trump, it's Trump. If it's not, and there's fraud in the system, no matter whose, it should be rooted out.

      replyreport
   8. 88

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      3 precincts in wisconsin caught padding votes for trump. whos in wisconsin?? oh yeah...walker and the kochs. boooooo

      replyreport