I am about half-way through "Man Of The House," an autobiography by Tip, (Tom), O'Neil and William Novak, and I have been thinking about my fellow Politics and Social Issues forum dwellers since the very first chapter.
Tip O'Neil started his political career in Massachusetts in 1936, and was Speaker for the United States House of Representatives for 10 years, (1977-1987).
All the political issues we discuss were there; patronage, political maneuverings, backroom deals, straw candidates to split voting blocks, and yes, there were some tales of actual corruption. And for the icing on the cake, there is a lot of discussion about the Kennedys. From senior Joe's efforts to promote his sons, to JFK's political track to the presidency. (you are going to love reading about Boston politics and the Kennedys)
But... I know it sounds crazy, but most of the stuff from his time wasn't contrary to public interest. For instance, the patronage issues, (mostly from his time in the Massachusetts legislature in the WWII era), were mostly everyday citizens going to their representatives for help getting jobs - not as a return of favors, but just asking their rep for help. (not unlike our citizens of today going to their Reps. for Academy recommendations) It seems that every year there were a limited number of temp jobs helping the post office, they paid $100 p/week, for a couple weeks, and as O'Neil describes it - those temp jobs could make the deference between an OK Christmas and a crap Christmas. My point being that the patronage described wasn't the kind that put a political contributor into a high-paying cushy job, but the kind that helped average constituents.
I think I recall that patronage for local government posts, (like post office or administrator jobs), were/are a big part of British politics too.
That was just an example. The one recurring point was that politics is one thing, but friendship and a man's word were another. Even Pres. Reagan spoke of him, (in his own autobiography), as a fiercest political foe - but one that you could sit down and have a drink and discussion with at the end of the day.
This book should be a must-read for political discussion addicts.
Interesting , I remember well the Reagan --O'neil games , I have often wondered , What ever happened to the civility of opposition ideologies !
Gentleman Politics .
Yes ahorseback, Pres. Reagan did have some tough fights with O'Neil leading partisan attacks on his policy efforts, but, as you mentioned, it was truly ideological differences, not personal rancor.
In reading O'Neil's description of political episodes from around 1940 to the 1980s, the one thing that seemed to be missing, then, is today's personal character assassinations.
But I don't want to paint too innocent a picture of Mr. Tip O'Neil. Consider this related anecdote;
In one of his Massachusetts' races he was having a tough campaign, and one of his political associates, a former disgraced mayor asked if he could raise some cash for O'Neil. O'Neil said yes, and the following week the fellow told O'Neil he had raised $500 for him and handed him an envelope of cash. Later, when O'Neil counted the cash it was only $450! The following week the fellow said he raised a $1000 for him, and handed him another envelope of cash. But it only contained $900. O'Neil's helper was taking a 10% commission - and O'Neil was OK with that. When O'Neil asked for the contributor's names so he could thank them, the mayor said they had already been thanked - and O'Neil was Ok with that too.
But the kicker is that a few years later, an incident with one of the contributors that gave the former mayor money for O'Neil, caused O'Neil to realize that he was the one getting the short end of the stick - by a lot more than just 10%. And that was the political atmosphere that Tip O'Neil's political talents grew in.
The Tip O'Neil and Ronald Reagan relationship was a classic. It's a shame that we don't have more of them in DC today.
I suspect they made the typical public announcements that appealed to their respective parties and then got things done together behind the scenes.
Truly nostalgic, both Tip ONeal and President Reagan, although ideological opposites, were appreciative of the art of compromise. Compared to the madness today, the 80s had to be considered "the good old days" in comparison.
It has indeed gone downhill, hasn't it? Sad.
Yes, indeed, and I don't know what is will take to bring either side away from the brink.
Since the GOP is in charge of White House and Congress, the ball is now in their court to demonstrate that they are willing to compromise with the other side.
I think you are right about that Credence2, and I did think of you when reading this book. I know I have prodded you on a couple other books, but I think you would really enjoy this one. It is less than 400 pages, well written, (Novak is excellent. He has co-authored several other great political figure's books), and it's only a couple dollars on Half,com.
I even have an extra hardcover copy I will mail to you, free, if you are comfortable giving me your address in a private message. (I picked up a copy at the flea market only to find I already had one at home that I hadn't read yet) I promise not to "stalk" you for your PROGRESSIVE! attitudes, and you really would enjoy the book - O'Neil was a Progressive Democrat too.
So give my offer some thought.
Thanks, for the offer, having the book in hand is an incentive in itself to read it through. My house is littered with great books that I have meant to read but never found the time. Not like in the eighties as a single man who while working spent the much of his time in recreational reading. Eye strain is a factor for me,too as since I have glasses and don't take as much pleasure in reading volumous books the way I us to,(Jakes, Michener)
Ironic, being married and retired, I seem to have less time than I did when I was single even though engaged in work.
I will get back with you on the particulars of the arrangement through e-mail.
I know what you mean about finding the time bud. (I have a stack a couple feet high that I am trying to whittle down), so I turned to multitasking. I always have a book in the car for whenever I have to wait for something, a book on my night-table for as much as my tired eyes can stay open for, a current "main" read, (like this one), that lays on my computer desk, and another in one other place I won't mention because my wife says so.
I don't recall ever reading any Michener, but as you will remember - I am a huge John Jakes fan.
To get back to O'Neil, So far I am just where he becomes a freshman House Representative, but even though I disagree with many of his ideas, and even though he was a political animal that wasn't afraid to play hardball... so far I have not perceived any but the best intentions of his efforts to help his constituents and his party. (it's the "party" part I do have trouble with)
I am beginning to understand why even his political opponents, (and enemies), respected him. But he was a man of his times. Now-a-days his antics would probably play-out in public like Pres. Trump's efforts do now.
Michener is one hell of a saga writer. I have only read one his books, Centennial. The story was about the Colorado territory beginning with early 19th century fur trappers and explorers to what was to become the State of Colorado and it sprawling 'front range'. Since the period the book was written, a City by the name Centennial, Colorado was incorporated.
I was fully engaged during the Eighties, concerned about Reagan and the remote fears of his dismantling the New Deal in favor of 'Supply Side Economic" courtesy of David Stockman. Disagreements did not bring the government operations to a halt. Opposing poles from either party stayed within the parameters of compromise.
I may have told you before, compared with the players today, Reagan was a prince. His optimism was infectious and you really wanted to give his Polly Anna ideas for America a chance, because he truly believed them.
He had the balls to personally address the Denver Urban League in 1981,with the message that there was anew sheriff in town and that the current direction of the American economy was going to change starkly and we were certain to disapprove of the changes.
Ive got a soft spot for men with courage, I actually lost my bearings and wanted to give him a chance. I couldn't help butto admire the way he handled the attempted assassination. Passionate and authentic Trumps amoral,expedient and cowardly every time
Holy Cow! Talk about a "senior moment!" I have read that book! I loved it. I was especially impressed by the way the author wove the actual history of the territory into his story. Do you recall the particular Indian tribe, and chief, that he chronicled? And the actual dinosaur fossil pit finds that he incorporated?
One of the most poignant real-life facts he incorporated was that tribe's tradition of confiscating all the worldly goods, (including the best teepee poles, (which were valuable finds in that territory)) of a dead chief's wife, and banishing her, because without "a man" she could not contribute to the survival of the tribe.
Damn! It's like a damn burst. The failure of the town because the turnip plant closed, (not a joke), the loss of crop soil from following erroneous plowing techniques to compensate for such little rainfall, I am drowning in memories of that book. You are right, it was a fantastic read. I just didn't recall it as being by Michener. Hell, I didn't even remember reading it until your title mention joggled my search algorithm.
Double damn! Now I wonder what else I have forgotten. Maybe I am a Bitcoin millionaire and just don't remember what file I stashed them in. ;-)
But back to politics. If Pres. Reagan had that effect on you, a Progressive, then you can imagine the effect he had on us like-minded folks. Your description of him is very accurate. Even my reads by his enemies say the same thing about him.
ps..you know there is still a valid debate about the effectiveness of his "supply-side" economic policies. It is hard to argue with the historical statistics that show his era was one of our longest stretches of prosperity we have had. ... just say'n
I have forgotten so much about the book as I must read it 35 years ago at a minimum. You can probably get more information from a synopsis of the book on line, as my memory is faulty. Two names stood out, Mc Keeg and Brambaugh.
During the heyday of lavish network miniseries, seventies and eighties, right up there with Roots, Eleanor and Franklin, The Winds of War, etc. was Centennial. The dramatic version was excellent and had everyone on their seats to see what would happen next. It might actually on you tube these days, it is a great show.
Reagan has been credited for bringing us back from the brink, but with the stagnation of the Carter years all we could do was go up. Do conservatives give Obama credit to staving off the possibility of a depression in the aftermath of Bush's term?
We can give Obama credit for some things ;
- Doubling , raising the national debt more than ALL past presidents combined
- Compromising and politicizing previously neutral DOJ , FBI , NSA , IRS , ATF.......
- Creating more sophomoric campus bias and violence
- Facilitating and in fact promoting the corruption of DNC by the Clinton mafia
- Creating , fanning the flames of false racism
- Costing thousands of oil , coal energy jobs
- Wasting billions of tax dollars on "green energy " bankruptcies
- Didn't even do much for Bernie Sanders ?
Yea , pretty similar to Carter years .
To you and the media . Not the rest of the world.
The "rest of the world" comprised of rightwing pinheads.
Careful , you getting personal , or is that the only meaningful argument left of the left?
Hopefully, to help mitigate my "senior moment," I imagine it's been a decade or more since I read it. I didn't know they made a mini-series out of it either.
I guess you went as far as you could with the Reagan commentary. No worries.
Here's a trivia fact for you. I'm sure you have heard the theory that the Iranians waited for Reagan to be sworn in before allowing the hostage flight to take off - as in it was a Reagan political arrangement.
But what we didn't hear about was that Pres.-elect Reagan had a chain of messengers set-up so that the release moment could be relayed to him on the inauguration platform- and immediately announced - whether he had been sworn-in yet or not. He did personally feel bad for the way the timing turned out for Pres. Carter.
I like to think the Reagan really did not have the needed deviant nature to do such a dastardly deed. He was an overgrown boy scout. I can't say the same of his operatives. it was one hell of a coincidence. I don't know that if Carter had got the credit for the release of the hostages prior to the election if it would have helped him. We had a lot of problems with the economy at the time, that might have done him in, in of itself, just like it did GHW Bush back in 1992
Oops! Correction. I just remembered it was a Sugar Beet factory, not a turnip factory. But anyway, like many small towns today, the factory was the lifeblood of the community that grew-up around it. And when the factory closed - the town died.
I understand your thought promisem, but readings from a several different sources - including Reagan and O'Neil's autobiographies, show that most of the compromises, (none that I have read ever caused me to think of them as 'backroom deals, they always seemed to be pragmatic understandings), they may have ended up with were on details, never principles or ideologies. Pres. Reagan was particularly frustrated with O'Neil's partisan stubbornness, but always qualified his criticisms by noting it was never personal with O'Neil, and outside the halls of Congress they were almost friends.
But you are certainly right that it is a shame that we don't seem to have those types of leadership qualities in too many of our elected representatives today.
It's pretty simple , There used to even be an order to the conflict in differing political conversations . manners for one , But the blacking out of media integrity , accuracy and honesty by the left , wasn't part of the picture then .Now to the left ,"free speak" has become one speak
TODAY, this atmosphere is what we get when the ideology of the left declares war on common thought , open media and obstructs due process in all political conversation and legislative process .
And so the radical right is innocent and pure as wind driven snow? I doubt it.
Hey ahorseback, you are right that media integrity took a dive - about the time cable started the 24-hour news channels, and is now viewed as a profit center - rather then a bastion of honest efforts. And you are right about the deceitful nature of the PC efforts, but your "left Free speak" and media bias tirades are just the left foot replacing the right foot of the OIbama years.
These Left-speak and whining Leftist media rants are just a different version of the Right's pre-Trump whining and rants, and don't have a thing to do with the history of Tip O'Neil's political life.
We'll have to agree to disagree on media bias , how much , how long or how often it occurs and Just how balanced even the opposing bias' are is between office incumbent Ideologies . Have been around longer than probably most forum writers , I can say that liberal media bias has for decades been a thorn in my side. And , more than likely that the mainstream news is more liberally biased , It simply has to be given it's origins and birth in academia .. Let's face it , accuracy , integrity and ideological balance is a thing of the past.
Today --- It is not just left , it is pretty far left in it's obstructionism, instructionalism of our younger more impressionable minds . That cannot be debated or denied .
By the way ,please show me the Tip O'niel of today
Speaker O'Neil died in 1994, so it would be hard to show the O'Neil of today.
But in reference to what I think you are referring to - that some of his political efforts of his time, that were not seen as particularly evil or corrupt, but would be viewed so today; here is a passage dealing with the Kennedy years and his brother Teddy's first political campaign:
(plagiarized, and condensed, from the book)
President Kennedy had a good rapport with the Speaker of the House John McCormack.
- McCormack's nephew was going to run against Teddy, and was projected to lose badly.
- The President didn't want the Speaker to think he was advocating for Teddy, or hold his nephew's looming humiliating defeat against him and hurt their political relationship.
- He asked Tip O'neil to act as an intermediary to find a way out both sides could agree on.
Can you imagine how that would have played out in today's political arena?
Alas, it is not yet available on Kindle. I'll keep an eye out for it. I can barely read most books anymore unless they are on my Kindle where I can use a larger font.
Sorry to hear that, PP. I went through the same thing before my cataract surgery - went from a book a week (or more) to one per year before I found electronic books. Hoping there is something that can be done for you, too.
My problem is different. I have retinal histoplasmosis from a fungal infection I apparently contracted when I was a toddler. My retina has tiny "dents" that, over time, can start to bleed. I get injections to stop the bleeds but I end up with scarring on my retina that results in gaps in my vision. I was recently fitted with a new type of contact lens that has restored my vision to 20-50 for driving. Doesn't help with reading, though.
My 58-year-old eyes are more like an 88-year old. The upside is when I go to the eye specialist and observe the clientele in the waiting room, I feel very, very young. ;-)
Sorry to hear that PrettyPanther. I doubt it will make it to Kindle. Googlebooks says there is no eBook version available.
Get a page magnifier! This book is worth the effort for us political discussion addicts, (at least us addicts that like to know the history of what we are talking about).
Here is a link to a brief review, with a couple anecdotal examples that just might wet your appetite enough to consider the effort.
My point in asking "Who is the Tip Oneal of today ?" Meant , is N. Pelosi, H Reid , maybe Barbara Boxer or Diane Feinstein ? True political talent is best fondly remembered , it is sorely lacking today , on both sides .
by ga anderson 3 years ago
It is a difficult book to plod through, but for you folks that think political dealings, (especially those with international interactions), are or should be black or white, right or wrong, I highly recommend Henry Kissinger's White House Years, Putting aside judgements of whether Nixon was a good...
by Kathryn L Hill 2 years ago
Democrats expect people to pull together to help one another in a collective way. They do not realize this system removes a certain amount of individual freedom through raising taxes. Republicans want to empower the individual by keeping taxes low. They believe individuals, (through the self-effort...
by dutchman1951 8 years ago
If this below is really true, and it is from the Library of Congress on Congressional By-laws and operations. Than how did any bill proposed that affects the Public generaly. sucH as Cap and Trade, Health reform, get to be declared Private.Did Pelosi break her own Congressional law? I think...
by Susan Reid 6 years ago
During the 2010 mid-terms the GOP campaigned fiercely on the platform of job creation and, as a result of such promises, the GOP gained the majority in the House of Representatives. As the new Speaker of the House, John Boehner made the welcome claim that the primary goal of the Republican Party...
by Davinagirl3 9 years ago
I allowed myself to become enrapt in some forum threads this morning, and I think I may have become a darker, meaner version of myself. My inner demon came out. I was called names as soon as I voiced my OPINION. I sank to a level that was unbecoming to myself, and I am wondering...
by Dennis L. Page 6 years ago
Why, when it comes to politics, are people so vile and filled with such hatred?Whenever there is a political question, inevitably I see those who comment with snide and derogatory commentary to anyone with opposing views. Whatever happened to intellectual dialogue? Furthermore, instead of stating a...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|