Aw, every time I make a point that bugs you, I am shallow or naive. You are trying to say Comey personally put a Seth Rich investigation on the back burner. Since the FBI isn't even investigating the murder, your comment seems especially ridiculous. Do you have any evidence? I doubt it, but please share it if you do. If you don't, then you are the one being shallow by making a laughable accusation.
Yes , all evidence so far , when the media asks , is that the investigation resides between the DC detectives and the FBI who told the police ' ......we are investigating ....", no one knows who has his personal cell and P.C. , interesting ? Beleive ? No. then perhaps you ARE just in denial of reality .
As a center right , I will be perfectly happy if the left never see's anything agreeably with the right and knowing the left very well , I know they never will , our end game plan is just too too far apart. As long as the left actually has the right paying the lefts bills - the left will never cross that line anyway
I watched a part of the Comey testimony and noted with relief that Republicans on the committee were at least as sane as the Democrats. There is still some hope for the US. You just have to get through the Trump thing and get back to some kind of rational debate.
I listened for hours of Comey's B.S., I've never seen such self aggrandizing since Richard Nixon's days. Comey decided to wear the cloaks of the justice , The suit of the FBI and the " Press " lapel button all at once in his tenure . Obama should have fired him but probably didn't pay him on time ,so he had to hang around,
Therriault was Seths mentor or up the chain boss or something. He allegedly posted a tweet tagging the deceased and said a group of pandas was an embarrassment. Recently he has scrubbed or deleted all but very recent posts. Didnt dirty donna also delete mass posts prior to certain dates? Plus the victims accounts have all disappeared.
Before the election the Obamas were deleting supportive posts for Hillary from Twitter. I guess they knew ahead of time she wasn't going to win. I knew it, so why wouldn't they. It was like they wanted to distance themselves from her.
The Profiling Project released a 83 page report, that they believe it was not a random homocide or robbery and was more likely done by hired killer or serial killer.
Chad Bauman the DNC Crisis Actor, uhm Brad Bauman the The DNC Crisis handler, is sticking with the non robbery botched robbery theory. DC Metro are the finest investigators in the country. No leads yet.
Rich was a lowly member of the DNC, without access to much insider info, was murdered in a high crime area at 4 am and gave no information to police about being 'lured to his death' before he eventually died.
There is a complete absence of evidence that he was in any way hostile to Hillary Clinton, or planned to work for the FBI, so why not just accept that the poor man was almost certainly murdered for being in the wrong place at the wrong time?
You need an alarmingly unwell kind of mental constitution to believe conspiracy theories like this.
You are also being exploited by unscrupulous writers who will say anything to lure traffic to their sites.
How does the left actually live and breath conspiracy and yet when it slaps them in the face ,? It's then fake ? Is that kind of like the Georgia house race lost to democrats last night ? You thought because you spent 50 million California Democrat dollars in a hundred thousand dollar campaign you could buy a Georgia house seat ?
So, based on your lack of knowing anything, you come to the astute conclusion of " he was at the wrong place at the wrong time". I can see how not knowing anything could be a valuable asset, if not knowing anything is the goal.
After a year and an 888 page report, the Warren Commission concludes JFK was at the wrong place at the wrong time. NS? Spare me. What statements? If you would like to discuss it, specifically will, at least be knowledgable.
Without credible witnesses or documentary evidence, you are simple falling for a fantasy.
It is more than just deluded nonsense, it is very, very harmful:
It fills the air with unnecessary fear (some people will really believe DNC assassination squads exist) It damages the right's credibility, especially when the nonsense is pushed by 'mainstream' networks like Fox It reduces the possibility of constructive political dialogue, because it promotes hatred across the political spectrum.
Well, I can appreciate your sincere concern about the rights credibility and the potential reduction of constructive political dialogue. DNC Hit squads sounds a little dramatic to me, but if that is your take, well.
Recently some crazed lefty fired at a group of Congressmen. Still in the hospital. I am sure wiki has a list of recent proven politically motivated assassination in the US. I think you are naive.
Dont worry be happy BBC Will tell you the whole truth and nothing but. Its a safe place.
The BBC will protect its reputation by not publishing stories which have no evidence to support them. Neither will the rest of the mainstream media. Come up with one credible witness to support just one part of your story, and I am sure eager newshounds will be flocking to your door.
Do you have any evidence that it was a botched robbery? Maybe it was a racially motivated hate crime? What if someone insulted a favorite sports team? Do you remember the last time you wandered the streets of a large city at 415 AM calling everyone you know? There are truths of reason and truths of facts, facts of course according to sources. Facts you are short on, and time I am unwilling to waste. Not only newshounds but a sizable reward offered by Wikileaks
A crazy lefty liberal already attempted to assassinate mass congressmen, just the other day. Yet you find the notion sensational.
As far as backing it up, you cannot tell the difference between Humpty Dumpty and Josh Uretsky. Can you ? Do you ? That would be like Einstein trying to explain relativity to the village idiot. You have not even remotely shown that you are knowledgable.
The only political dog I had in the fight, was hillary losing. Yet it is you, that is concerned about the effect of searching for or finding the truth or solving an unsolved murder, might have on quote unquote "political dialouge". Is that not the truth? You said it.
Impaired judgement. What type of business does Prince Andrew do with Jeffrey Epstein. Personally, I would not be taking walks with a convicted pedophile. Doing any kind of business with a convicted pedophile. Inviting a pedophile to birthday parties at Buckingham Palace. Not my cup o tea. I do not presume to know the politics of the UK. I have no idea if they keep harry locked up in the tower.
But I have been to Arkansas.
Josh Uretsky, as well as 4 or 5 other " lowly staffers " down at the Berns campaign were able to easily access Hillarys " insider info "
Reports are circulating that former FBI Director James Comey had begun drafting a letter exonerating Hillary Clinton from any crime related to her e-mail scandal, BEFORE, ever interviewing her or a dozen other key...
Here are the FACTS as we know them:Jan 27, 2017: Trump has dinner with Comey and, according to Comey, Trump asked Comey for a loyalty oath' but Comey only promised Trump honesty. Trump says he didn't but thought...
Say what you will about James Comey's performance as head of the FBI. You can think whatever you want about him. What is absolutely true is that he does NOT have the reputation of being a liar and there is historical...