"Reportedly, a large portion of the funds (from taxing soda-pop) will be used to expand Pre-K services."
This quote is from the post found here: http://hubpages.com/health/forum/142214 … money-grab
I am against the government getting involved with or offering public preschool.
I have little faith in government sponsored Pre-K programs and doubt they will be adequate in meeting the needs of this age group, based on what I have witnessed as a sub in classrooms where it is offered in my district.
Perhaps ... and hopefully, others have had good experiences with public Pre-K programs/services … ?
My observance of government directed school [preparing mah-en-mass to follow a single leader; as in a school of fish] systems I have observed governments have another system of schooling another portion of man-en-mass to control or kill them.
Example. 9/11 is the fulfillment of the nation's people schooled to accept lies [see http://hubpages.com/politics/Why-And-Ho … verthrown] put before them and not question the validity of the "cover up report" so when one does they must keep their mouths or loose their survival means and/or discarnate. The people accepted it or were too scared to speak out against it and to this day have done nothing the constitution [https://hubpages.com/politics/The-U-S-Constitutions-Spirit] and "Declaration of Independence" DEMANDS We The People do and have them impeached.
By that and many other observances, such as allowing "side effects" requiring other drug treatments on drugs designed to "only treat symptoms" with all of the healing medications in the plant kingdom without side effects, I am of the opinion the U.S. Government's whole intent is to make its people enrichers of Corporate Interests rather than any "Defence" against the destruction We The People. Thus, Government only want to deceive We The People that their interest is in Fulfilling the Preamble's intent for this government while keeping us blinded to the truth that they want only to keep We The People "dreaming the dream of material wealth at the expense of our own lives".
There should be no public schooling at all. Each parent, according to his or her means, should pay to put their kids through school and choose where they go and how they are educated.
"According to my observance of government-directed school systems, I have found that governments have systems of schooling which are actually ways to control or kill it's citizens."
Is this edit accurate, according to what you meant?
Thats a little scary, if so.
According to my knowledge of CIA/FBI/Homeland Security & other security agencies, yes, that is a very accurate account of what I mean. That is how 1930 Germany got that nation into their situation and is what the NWO want this nation to be like according to "The Patriot Act" (TPA). Children were taken away from parents and brainwashed into turning them in as spies and other "anti government" entities to be sent off to "concentration Camps" for forced labor or death camps, TPA has those same provisions in it.
I suppose it is a matter of great urgency. Therefore no one will adress it.
oh well, there's always next time around.
(This may be Atlantis, the second time around.)
Who will be left standing is the question!!!!!!!!!!
Are you for or against the US Constitution, AS IT WAS CREATED?
Or are you an advocate of anarchism?
Not "no" but "hell no"!!! Everything I said about what the Constitution means is what the words of the Preamble ["prelude of what is intended to be accomplished by the entire document"], Articles and Amendments intends. It was written to provide, among other things, Freedom ["the right to live ecologically"] or "the choice" live subjected to the dictate of people, AS IT READS, "We The People" choose and elect without reference to "classes or separations" of any type from among ourselves which We The People control (Amendment 10) by Impeaching (Article 2 section 4) for as little as a "Misdemeanors" and the maximum of "Treason".
No, you are not for anarchy.
Yes, you are for the Constitution. For its ideals. For what it set out to accomplish:
To protect our God-given rights.
Had you not just looked at the link I posted that question would not have been asked but thanks for realizing I am for not just a but the U.S. Constitutionally controlled government. I've never read any other constitution.
I looked at the link but you write in a confusing way.
- for instance what you just wrote:
I am for
not just a
what a weird bunch of words!
I meant to say "I am not for just a constitutionally controlled government but the U.S. Constitutionally controlled government." I make those kinds of errors especially where I forget the "more" next to reply means can edit it. I'm doing much in a short time online. Most of my bus I have edited to eliminate most errors out of.
The constitution controls the government? No, the constitution helps to guide the wills of MEN & WOMEN. In other words: PEOPLE choose to be guided according to a document which serves to provide ways to ensure Freedom and Justice for all.
We debate and discuss the ways every day, these days. People seem so confused ... but its really very simple. Freedom within common-sense boundaries.
Don't tell me what to do do or how to live or how to think, but please provide boundaries to my behavior and the behavior of others so that we can live in harmony and squelch the the tyrannies and various unjust and unwise whims of others.
Its not rocket science.
The way the US Constitution reads "We The People" controls the people we "choose and then elect" into the White House and Congress" and dictate to our congressman to accept or rejects the President's Cabinet and Supreme Court appointments. Basically that is "The People" governing themselves.
Yes. We are supposed to dictate to our representatives according to our will, and they must serve US. We can vote them out if they do not follow our will. If we do not vote them out and they become OUR dictators, whose fault is that?
If those elected refuse tom be governed by us they are not keeping their oath to"protect the constitution from enemies, domestic and foreign" because they becomes a domestic enemy because not adhering to the dictate of it. That IS an impeachable act, a high crime of perjury which is higher than a Misdemeanor.
Instead, THEY want to tell us how to think, what to think and what to do.
Who are they?
Listen! You'll hear them.
Not voted out but Impeached out so they will never be able to serve in any government position again. The impeachment Article, 2.4, reads “Judgments in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States:” therefore Impeachment is the thing to do. Recalls on the state level is the same as federal impeachment so the above quote applies to the states as well.
By the way, pre-K children need freedom within boundaries. They are learning to guide their own wills. Their ability to guide their own wills must be allowed to develop according to natural and universal stages. (Natural progressions of development applies to all children.) Children need to follow their own wills. At the same time, they absorb the boundaries and ways of civilized life on an unconscious level.
Civilized life does not HAVE TO reflect 100% tyranny on the part of adults ... or governments.
But it will, if we don't get a grip.
… and we will suffer.
… now, if we have no wills because the public school system has obliterated them, and we no longer comprehend the power we have under The US Constitution … that's another story and foretells a dim future.
... especially if you can not get people even to read an interpretation of the constitution, the future is VERY DIM unless someone, as I have done, file an impeachment order with the AG, "Department of Justice Document Number 3758011 demanding the impeachment of all government department heads and president cabinet, excluding of the last 3 supreme court justices and Session I intend to perform the Impeachment and trial, and others yet to be named.
by Catherine Mostly 16 months ago
New Idea for an American Political Revolution: Masse Voter Protest by not Voting for Either Party.What if we filled Congress & POTUS during the next big election with people not running under the GOP or Democrat party? (It could be a one-time protest, not necessarily a new way for us to...
by Peeples 3 years ago
Can someone explain how it is constitutionally acceptable to have Sunday alcohol bans?I live in a state that still has Blue Laws and slowly more and more towns are getting rid of them, but some cities still have bans on Sunday Alcohol sales. Since the reasoning behind the Sunday alcohol bans not...
by Elijah A Alexander Jr 2 years ago
Hi Hubbers,I'd like some help with passing the Quality Assessment Process. Will you please give feedback on my Hub HOW TO GOVERN CONSTITUTIONALLY (must be signed in to view). What specifically prevents it from being publishable as is? Thanks!
by JAKE Earthshine 2 weeks ago
Major, Grotesque Conflict of INTEREST: How much money should Mr. Trump be allowed to receive via our enemies funneling cash through his hotel coffers then right into his greedy little cheap suit pockets before it’s defined as a major, unprecedented federal crime? In a fully functioning democracy,...
by Justin Earick 4 years ago
And what makes some believe that they can take down most well-funded and -armed military in the world with shotguns and assault rifles?
by SparklingJewel 8 years ago
Shame on Pelosi's "Deem and Pass" Trickery Take Action! March 17, 2010House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-CA) shameful scheme to "deem" the Senate Obamacare bill into law without a vote violates Article I, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution. As we mentioned in our...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|