jump to last post 1-10 of 10 discussions (25 posts)

To Expand or Not to Expand Pre-K Services

  1. Kathryn L Hill profile image89
    Kathryn L Hillposted 3 months ago

    "Reportedly, a large portion of the funds (from taxing soda-pop) will be used to expand Pre-K services."
    This quote is from the post found here: http://hubpages.com/health/forum/142214 … money-grab

    I am against the government getting involved with or offering public preschool.

    I have little faith in government sponsored Pre-K programs and doubt they will be adequate in meeting the needs of this age group, based on what I have witnessed as a sub in classrooms where it is offered in my district.

    Perhaps ... and hopefully, others have had good experiences with public Pre-K programs/services … ?

    1. The0NatureBoy profile image78
      The0NatureBoyposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      My observance of government directed school [preparing mah-en-mass to follow a single leader; as in a school of fish] systems I have observed governments have another system of schooling another portion of man-en-mass to control or kill them.

      Example. 9/11 is the fulfillment of the nation's people schooled to accept lies [see http://hubpages.com/politics/Why-And-Ho … verthrown] put before them and not question the validity of the "cover up report" so when one does they must keep their mouths or loose their survival means and/or discarnate. The people accepted it or were too scared to speak out against it and to this day have done nothing the constitution [https://hubpages.com/politics/The-U-S-Constitutions-Spirit] and "Declaration of Independence" DEMANDS We The People do and have them impeached.

      By that and many other observances, such as allowing "side effects" requiring other drug treatments on drugs designed to "only treat symptoms" with all of the healing medications in the plant kingdom without side effects, I am of the opinion the U.S. Government's whole intent is to make its people enrichers of Corporate Interests rather than any "Defence" against the destruction We The People. Thus, Government only want to deceive We The People that their interest is in Fulfilling the Preamble's intent for this government while keeping us blinded to the truth that they want only to keep We The People "dreaming the dream of material wealth at the expense of our own lives".

    2. Sychophantastic profile image83
      Sychophantasticposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      There should be no public schooling at all. Each parent, according to his or her means, should pay to put their kids through school and choose where they go and how they are educated.

  2. Kathryn L Hill profile image89
    Kathryn L Hillposted 3 months ago

    "According to my observance of government-directed school systems, I have found that governments have systems of schooling which are actually ways to control or kill it's citizens."
    Is this edit accurate, according to what you meant?

    Thats a little scary, if so. yikes
    Yikes!

    1. The0NatureBoy profile image78
      The0NatureBoyposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      According to my knowledge of CIA/FBI/Homeland Security & other security agencies, yes, that is a very accurate account of what I mean. That is how 1930 Germany got that nation into their situation and is what the NWO want this nation to be like according to "The Patriot Act" (TPA). Children were taken away from parents and brainwashed into turning them in as spies and other "anti government" entities to be sent off to "concentration Camps" for forced labor or death camps, TPA has those same provisions in it.

  3. Kathryn L Hill profile image89
    Kathryn L Hillposted 3 months ago

    I suppose it is a matter of great urgency. Therefore no one will adress it.


    oh well, there's always next time around.

    (This may be Atlantis, the second time around.)

    Who will be left standing is the question!!!!!!!!!!
    ?

    1. The0NatureBoy profile image78
      The0NatureBoyposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      The USA is 1930s Germany enlarged to cover the whole nation.

  4. Kathryn L Hill profile image89
    Kathryn L Hillposted 3 months ago

    Y O U?

    think again.

  5. Kathryn L Hill profile image89
    Kathryn L Hillposted 2 months ago

    Are you for or against the US Constitution, AS IT WAS CREATED?
    Or are you an advocate of anarchism?

    1. The0NatureBoy profile image78
      The0NatureBoyposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      Not "no" but "hell no"!!!  Everything I said about what the Constitution means is what the words of the Preamble ["prelude of what is intended to be accomplished by the entire document"], Articles and Amendments intends. It was written to provide, among other things, Freedom ["the right to live ecologically"] or "the choice" live subjected to the dictate of people, AS IT READS, "We The People" choose and elect without reference to "classes or separations" of any type from among ourselves which We The People control (Amendment 10) by Impeaching (Article 2 section 4) for as little as a "Misdemeanors" and the maximum of "Treason".

      1. Kathryn L Hill profile image89
        Kathryn L Hillposted 2 months agoin reply to this

        No, you are not for anarchy.
        Yes, you are for the Constitution. For its ideals. For what it set out to accomplish:
        To protect our God-given rights.
        Well, Good!

        Me too.

        1. The0NatureBoy profile image78
          The0NatureBoyposted 2 months agoin reply to this

          Had you not just looked at the link I posted that question would not have been asked but thanks for realizing I am for not just a but the U.S. Constitutionally controlled government.  I've never read any other constitution.

          1. Kathryn L Hill profile image89
            Kathryn L Hillposted 2 months agoin reply to this

            I looked at the link but you write in a confusing way.
            - for instance what you just wrote:

            I am for
            not  just a
            but the
            U.S.
            Constitutionally controlled
            government. 

            HUH????
            what a weird bunch of words!

            1. The0NatureBoy profile image78
              The0NatureBoyposted 2 months agoin reply to this

              I meant to say "I am not for just a constitutionally controlled government but the U.S. Constitutionally controlled government." I make  those kinds of errors especially  where I forget the "more" next to reply means can edit it. I'm doing much in a short time online. Most of my bus I have edited to eliminate most errors out of.

  6. Kathryn L Hill profile image89
    Kathryn L Hillposted 2 months ago

    The constitution controls the government? No, the constitution helps to guide the wills of MEN & WOMEN. In other words: PEOPLE choose to be guided according to a document which serves to provide ways to ensure Freedom and Justice for all.

    We debate and discuss the ways every day, these days. People seem so confused ... but its really very simple. Freedom within common-sense boundaries.

    Don't tell me what to do do or how to live or how to think, but please provide boundaries to my behavior and the behavior of others so that we can live in harmony and squelch the the tyrannies and various unjust and unwise whims of others.

    Boundaries.
    Freedom.
    Its not rocket science.

    1. The0NatureBoy profile image78
      The0NatureBoyposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      The way the US Constitution reads "We The People" controls the people we "choose and then elect" into the White House and Congress" and dictate to our congressman to accept or rejects the President's Cabinet and Supreme Court appointments. Basically that is "The People" governing themselves.

      1. Kathryn L Hill profile image89
        Kathryn L Hillposted 2 months agoin reply to this

        Yes. We are supposed to dictate to our representatives according to our will, and they must serve US. We can vote them out if they do not follow our will. If we do not vote them out and they become OUR dictators, whose fault is that?
        Ours.

        1. The0NatureBoy profile image78
          The0NatureBoyposted 2 months agoin reply to this

          If those elected refuse tom be governed by us they are not keeping their oath to"protect the constitution from enemies, domestic and foreign" because they becomes a domestic enemy because not adhering to the dictate of it. That IS an impeachable act, a high crime of perjury which is higher than a Misdemeanor.

  7. Kathryn L Hill profile image89
    Kathryn L Hillposted 2 months ago

    Instead, THEY want to tell us how to think, what to think and what to do.
    Who are they?
     
    Listen! You'll hear them.

  8. Kathryn L Hill profile image89
    Kathryn L Hillposted 2 months ago

    Vote THEM out.

    1. The0NatureBoy profile image78
      The0NatureBoyposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      Not voted out but Impeached out so they will never be able to serve in any government position again.  The impeachment Article, 2.4, reads “Judgments in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States:” therefore Impeachment is the thing to do. Recalls on the state level is the same as federal impeachment so the above quote applies to the states as well.

  9. Kathryn L Hill profile image89
    Kathryn L Hillposted 2 months ago

    By the way, pre-K children need freedom within boundaries. They are learning to guide their own wills. Their ability to guide their own wills must be allowed to develop according to natural and universal stages. (Natural progressions of development applies to all children.) Children need to follow their own wills. At the same time, they absorb the boundaries and ways of civilized life on an unconscious level.

    Civilized life does not HAVE TO reflect 100% tyranny on the part of adults ... or governments.
    But it will, if we don't get a grip.
    … and we will suffer.

    1. The0NatureBoy profile image78
      The0NatureBoyposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      We agree 100% here.

  10. Kathryn L Hill profile image89
    Kathryn L Hillposted 2 months ago

    … now, if we have no wills because the public school system has obliterated them, and we no longer comprehend the power we have under The US Constitution … that's another story and foretells a dim future.

    1. The0NatureBoy profile image78
      The0NatureBoyposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      ... especially if you can not get people even to read an interpretation of the constitution, the future is VERY DIM unless someone, as I have done, file an impeachment order with the AG, "Department of Justice Document Number 3758011 demanding the impeachment of all government department heads and president cabinet, excluding of the last 3 supreme court justices and Session I intend to perform the Impeachment and trial, and others yet to be named.

 
working