jump to last post 1-2 of 2 discussions (15 posts)

Hillary's State Department approved 215 Bill Clinton speeches

  1. colorfulone profile image87
    colorfuloneposted 3 months ago

    State Department approved 215 Bill Clinton speeches, controversial consulting deal, worth $48m; Hillary Clinton's COS copied on all decisions.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/state … le/2551428

    1. Ken Burgess profile image89
      Ken Burgessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      I just watched Clinton Cash last night, it was shown on One America News... sadly, it revealed far more than I had been aware of. 

      Allowing the Clintons to get away with such depths of depravity and criminal activity while serving as SOS sets a precedent that will lead to far worse crimes being done by our government officials in the future.

      Clinton is the posterchild for the corruption rampant in D.C.

      1. colorfulone profile image87
        colorfuloneposted 3 months agoin reply to this

        Clinton Cash was an eye opener for me too.  Everyone should watch it, and do their own research if they have any doubts.  But..."Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed."  ~  Fredrich Nictzsche

        I wake up everyday thankful that Hillary and Bill are not in the White House.

      2. promisem profile image98
        promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

        One American News is another right-wing propaganda channel. Divide America. Destroy all liberals. Kill free speech. Love Putin for voting in Trump and blocking Clinton. The 2nd Amendment is the only one worth keeping. Etcetera...

        It's funny how you and other right-wing extremists accuse me of "spouting off more ignorant tripe", but you sure don't hesitate to spout it yourself.

        1. Ken Burgess profile image89
          Ken Burgessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

          I do, because that is all your posts ever are, you do not bring facts, you do not bring logical debate....
          Your posts since the election have been little more than derogatory or delusional/emotional tirades with no factual basis. Your post I referred to in the other thread is just one such example.  As is the post in this thread.  No factual basis, no provable concept, just tripe.

          1. promisem profile image98
            promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

            Someone who calls a dying John McCain who spent his life serving his country a POS is hardly in a position to judge me.

            1. colorfulone profile image87
              colorfuloneposted 3 months agoin reply to this

              Have you watched Clinton Cash?

              Who said John McCain is dying?  Did John?  I haven't heard that he is terminal.

              1. promisem profile image98
                promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

                When McCain and his doctors say he has a "very poor prognosis" from the deadliest brain cancer, and at his age, yes, he is dying. The average lifespan after diagnosis is about one year.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glioblastoma

                1. colorfulone profile image87
                  colorfuloneposted 3 months agoin reply to this

                  I didn't know that, that is too bad. I wouldn't wish that upon anyone, not even McCain, but I really do not care.  Maybe its poetic justice.   

                  Now can we get back to the topic of the thread.  You do habitually derail thread topics when you don't like the topic with things that are unrelated nonsense.

                  Care to weight in on the topic? Hint: its about Clinton corruption.

                  1. promisem profile image98
                    promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

                    Am I required to respond only to the original post and not to subsequent posts? I responded to his post about Clinton "depravity" and "criminal activity", which you did not mention in your OP. So if anyone derailed, it was him.

                    Otherwise, please offer evidence that I derail the topic of the post to which I am responding. I am glad to do the same with posters on your side of the fence. I have plenty of examples.

            2. Ken Burgess profile image89
              Ken Burgessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

              There is no judgement of you in my post(s), I merely state the facts, which you prove with your posts.

              You have contributed nothing of value to this thread, the other thread(s) you refer to, you just slander posters who do not agree with what you believe, and rant against Trump, and bring no facts, no links, no reality to back up your statements.

              1. promisem profile image98
                promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

                You use the words "you" and "your" five times in a raging, one-paragraph rant. I suggest looking up the definition of "judgment".

                FYI, I post more facts with links to credible sources than anyone on here. For anyone to claim otherwise is just silly.

          2. colorfulone profile image87
            colorfuloneposted 3 months agoin reply to this

            That's pretty good writing again, Ken.

            1. promisem profile image98
              promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

              I thought you and I were getting to a more peaceful relationship after you said "I will love you anyway".

  2. colorfulone profile image87
    colorfuloneposted 3 months ago

    As it turns out, Russia Bribed Hillary Clinton TWICE on treasonous Uranium deal - says Dick Morris, former Clinton consultant.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yTg9Pej-hQ

    Obama Admin. approved!

 
working