Are our Heads of State well protected from being assassinated?
Ever since the killings of presidents of the pass, I wonder what could have been done more to protect them. Since 911 - it seems that it's hard to protect the population as no one ever knows when they will strike. I sent a threating e-mail to the FBI I received which a Israelian said God tolk him that Clinton is the last satan filling Obama's mind with evil thing against the Jews. That Clinton & his family should be nailed to the crosses & that God said to kill them & destroy USA. I didn't take the threat lightly. God doesn't need humans . He has destroyed cities & thousand in the past.
I'm wondering why the e-mail was sent to you.Was it sent to others as well or just you? In anycase it sounds like a nutcase. The only other explanation is he's really hearing voices in his head telling him to do these things.I know there is technology that can do that. But as to who might be using it,I wouldn't know.. Every once in a while I hear stories about people who claimed to hear god tell them to do something like what you describe in your e-mail..
was sent to everyone not just me. Well, with the times as it is, one mustn't just ignore such messages. The FBI answered and thanked me for forwarding that e-mail. I know that our heads of states are in the target of nuts. By chance during Obama's campaign, a van was stopped for a broken taillight and the police found him suspicious and to make it short, he was on his way to join 4 others who had planned his assassination..so trust me it is in the making..to kill Clinton and his family and Obama too.
To an excess I believe. Since 911 more laws and restrictions fill tons of paper and recruit many to serve in that line of duty as security agents. Just attend a protest rally some day and you can feel their steely eye balls on the ground and in the air!
On a relative basis, the answer would be "yes". The primary reason is that we take more precautions today even though there is not necessarily a threat. Essentially, we treat every day as if there is a threat in terms of the level of security. This is quite a change from the era of JFK. You only have to look at photos of him in public places such as his last visit to Dallas to realize how exposed he was to danger at the time. Some of that was by his choice but some of it was just the inability of our security people to visualize such an occurrence. There is no methodology short of isolation that will totally take away the threat of assasination. Given the right people, the right situation and equipment and anything is possible though the stakes and the risk of pulling it off successfully are high. WB
by Brenda Durham 7 years ago
This is so much hogwash that's going on in America, perpetuated by the Leftist idealogues who want to shove the Bible into a mudhole along with the Christians.They say Christianity (they label it "religion") is "separate" from State policies, yet they allow a Muslim Imam to have...
by Holle Abee 6 years ago
What do you guys think about this? It's a tough call for me.http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat … story.html
by Clive Donegal 6 years ago
Which issue presents the greater threat to the future and security of the United States?1. Hilary Rosen’s remark that Ann Romney might not be an economics expert because she has never held a [paying] job, or 2. that a Secret Service agent on the president’s advance team spent the night with a...
by Adityapullagurla 4 years ago
What is going with the security measures in sochi, is it still safe for athletes to participate when there are terrorists attacks.
by My Esoteric 3 years ago
The Interview is a movie about assassinating the dictator of North Korea. Hackers (now determined to be from North Korea) busted into Sony Pictures, stole, and released embarrassing documents about Sony and their executives. The same or other hackers then threatened to do the same to...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 2 years ago
Today FBI Director James Comey indicated that the FBI investigation found that although Hillary Clinton may be careless regarding handling of her office e-mails, it has been concluded that Ms. Clinton didn't commit any criminal offenses. Your take on this?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|