In the US, if employers such temporary agencies do not provide health coverage, then who will?
Health cost is out of control in the US. An illness can wipe out all one's income and more. All humans need health coverage. In other countries health coverage is a right and guaranteed by their governments.
who will .........................................................................................................................
Some of the better temp agencies do offer benefit packages including health insurance, but you have to work a lot of hours for them before you qualify.
The previous answers are correct. Health coverage is not free. Temp agencies would have to charge for medical/dental and likely workers would not be accepted if they had prexisting conditions.
In the meantime, learn how to protect yourself.
- Stay healthy by eating nutritious foods.
- Avoid job-related accidents like falling off ladders. Be proactive and think ahead.
- If meds are needed buy over-the-counter stuff which are easily available and cheap.
- If a coworker is sick and coughing, etc., wear a mask.
- Use liberal amounts of disinfectant lotions and wash hands often. Keep your hands away from your face.
This cannot be stressed enough: Learn how to take care of yourself and your loved ones by living responsibly. Congress doesn't give a damn because they all have health care. So the free market vs nationalized health care issue won't be resolved anytime soon. Take away their ivory tower health plans and you'd see action overnight.
Health coverage is NOT a right. It is not something to be guaranteed by their governments. Such beliefs are held only by economic and political illiterates. The only money governments have for doling out (for medical or whatever) is extracted from all their subjects (so-called citizens).
Furthermore, health coverage should not be provided by ANY employer. Each person should be responsible for their own care, including buying their own MAJOR medical insurance (not sniffles and hangnail care).
"Third-partying" medical care and insurance by some employers has led to the disastrous situation we are now in. Getting the government even more involved will make it terminal.
Having employers and the government to NOT get involved will level the playing field. That will lead to reduced costs and better, more flexible care.
Now, I know that not many will read this, and most of those that do will disagree. Those are the idiots whose views and voting have led to the decline of the U.S. economic situation.
http://hubpages.com/hub/america-what-we … the-answer
by Grace Marguerite Williams 4 days ago
Why do some Americans believe that it is the government's job to rescue them & to give them a comfortable life? Why do so poor Americans feel that they are entitled to education, health care, housing, & the other amenities of life? I remember that if one wanted these...
by Inventurist 5 years ago
Have you been denied or paid more for medical services now that Obamacare is in effect?"Keep your current plan," ..."keep your doctor..." ..."insurance costs will go down.." "your care will improve..."seniors won't face bankruptcy for a medical...
by Holle Abee 8 years ago
I thought this article was interesting, especially since it appeared in the NYT. According to this guru, costs will INCREASE, not decrease. This is the same guru that democrats hailed as wonderful when he challenged Bush. Don't worry, though, costs will increase by only a few billion, and what's a...
by theirishobserver. 8 years ago
This email just arrived from the White House - is it what you wanted?What Happens Next Good afternoon,Since the House of Representatives voted to pass health reform legislation on Sunday night, the legislative process and its political impact have been the focus of all the newspapers and...
by Holle Abee 8 years ago
I just read this article and looked at this poll on CBS - not exactly a right-wing organization. I was actually a little surprised that the number of people opposed to the new law has increased instead of decreased. I kinda thought things had quieted down some, but then again, I haven't watched...
by Leslie McCowen 6 years ago
Most of Obama's "Controversial" Birth Control Rule Was Law During Bush YearsThe right has freaked out over an Obama administration rule requiring employers to offer birth control to their employees. Most companies already had to do that.—By Nick Baumann"Wed Feb. 8, 2012 2:10 PM...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|