Will the US, the West and Israel fold their hands and watch Iran develop nuclear weapons of mass...
destruction? asked Eng-rollingstone.
It would be profoundly dangerous for the world to let the current iranian regime acquire nuclear weapons, but then it was profoundly dangerous to let Israel get them also, and they have them.
Worrying about what Iran does now is a bit like "shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted".
If the American government of the day had the decency to give proper support to their great ally Shah Reza Pahlavi, they would not be in this situation now.
Their negligence brought this on their own heads.
I don't think there is a lot to be done. Iran is not a push-over and isn't about to be pushed around. I'm very anti-Israel so my feelings are they need a good hard lesson in reality. It's a religious state founded by terrorism. I have absolutely no sympathy for Israel... I said it, I mean it.
Israel is not and will not be the target of Iran with any future nuclear capability. The Iranian government knows the doctrine of "MAD" would apply to them and, contrary to popular belief, the Mullahs do not have any desire to commit national or personal suicide. "Israel" is a political tool that Iran and her allies use very effectively. They will continue to cause death and chaos in Palestine because it serves their political purposes. When it comes to a nuclear option their goals are much loftier than destroying Israel, which they know cannot be done militarily even with nuclear weapons.
This issue is much bigger that just Israel. The Iranians have long desired to be a major player in the world politically and militarily and they believe that nuclear weapons will give them what they could never achieve otherwise. Through threats and coercion their aim is to control the world's oil supply. The nation who controls the flow of the world's oil controls, at least to a point, the world's commerce. That is real power and that is the power the Iranians are after. They could bring America and Europe to their knees by simply destroying the Saudi oil fields and seizing the fields in southern Iraq and Kuwait which would , effectively, give them control of about 85% of the world's oil supply. America is hardly in any position to stop them at this point. The only thing holding Iran back is they do not have the Nuclear weapons yet. If they are successful in their weapons program then they they will move. This is the real danger to the world if Iran succeeds in acquiring Nukes....the threatened "destruction of Israel" is a political ploy that is very effective.
if the U.S. government can have them then so should anyone else be allowed. look at the track record of the U.S. government and tell me how fair they are . Iraq is a prime example of what happens when they want something but can't have it. sure it's scary when a country like iran has nukes but in the world stage what harm have they done to other nations compared to the U.S. and irael?
by Ralph Deeds 7 years ago
How serious and immediate is a nuclear threat from Iran? What should we do about it? Some of the same hawks who helped talk us into invading Iraq are coming out of the woodwork and saying that a nuclear Iran is intolerable and something must be done to prevent it from happening. A timely and...
by rhamson 9 years ago
With Irans new revelations that they have a secret site for the nuclear capabilities is this the latest step in the path to a nuclear war?
by AngelTrader 7 years ago
It is all falling neatly into place for the US to attack Iran on behalf of Saudi Arabia. The US views the plot as state-sponsored terrorism. Secretary of state Hillary Clinton described it as a "violation of international norms" and said she would discuss with allies in Europe and...
by Zubair Ahmed 7 years ago
Professor Francis Boyle, the person who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 enacted by the US Congress, said that in 2001-2004, the US Federal Government spent $14.5 billion for civilian bio-warfare-related work. What other purpose does this serve but to kill people?The US and...
by Hollie Thomas 7 years ago
The IEAE has suggested that Iran is currently building nuclear weapons. Many, many people knew this would be their stance. A suggestion that building nuclear weapons is completely different then possessing nuclear weapons. If Iran has to declare whether or not they are building, or indeed possess,...
by Harvey Stelman 9 years ago
Who among you is willing to admit they did not believe Iran wanted nuclear weapons? Talk the talk, now walk the walk!
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|