Do you feel that extremism and venomousness rhetoric led to the Arizona shootings?
I am pretty much a middle of the road, conservative Democrat and don't like the vicious, mud-slinging rhetoric that our politicians use. There are nut cases out there who might here things in such rhetoric as to do what the assassin on 1.8.11 did in Arizona. Do you feel that this could have been caused in part by the venom in today's politics? Do you feel it is a sign for not only politicians but people responding online to articles, commentary, etc. to watch what they say a bit more?
assasinations , crazy killers and sociopaths have been around since man began. i think that this shooting i another case of someone thinking they HAD to do this in order to stop someone they felt was horrible from living. this shooter probably has a reason that he can justify to homself. this isn't new but with the internet and modern media , it is more sensationalized
The shootings were the product of a deranged mind. Nothing more. It's unconscionable that either side is using this tragedy for political gain or finger pointing.
My heart goes out to all the families.
You can only speculate on such a connection. Too often that speculation assumes that the perpetrator was a rational individual who suddenly decided to commit a horrid crime when in actuality this was an individual who probably has a history of off center behavior which has fallen short of mark to this point. This is also the type situation in which gun-control types want to blame guns for the problems brought on by unstable people. Such an assumption works on the basis that if guns were not available, this crime would not have happen. That's too much of a stretch. Those who elect to carry out a particular crime are not concerned with the law nor breaking it and they are not concerned about how they have to go about it. Had it not been a gun, it could have just as well been a machete from the local pawn shop. We have to quite blaming things and look to the people who perpetrate the behavior. Getting rid of guns will not reduce crimes or violence because when we give up our guns in the name of law and order, the criminals and those who support the criminals will still have theirs. I don't want a would be criminal sitting in front of my house knowing that he can plan on breaking in and not facing a gun in the process. I want him to sit out there and think about and ask himself, "do I feel lucky....well do ya punk?" LOL! Thanks WB
Caroline: May I first point out that you spelled "here" wrong. That would be "hear". As for an answer, the rhetoric has been and continues to be spewed by democrats who, interestingly enough, are the biggest complainers about the very same rhetoric they spew. And how can anyone make a connection to any political "rhetoric" when it comes to Loughner? Nothing found online or off lends a sane mind to say politics on either side of the aisle had anything to do with it.
by Mike Russo 5 months ago
Our thoughts and prayers are with you and the victims is not enough to stop these senseless killings.
by Ralph Schwartz 2 years ago
Until 1989, there were only a few school shootings in which more than two victims were killed. This was despite widespread ownership of — and familiarity with — weapons and an absence of “gun-free zones.” Many rural areas had a long tradition of high-school students going hunting in...
by rhamson 7 years ago
Notwithstanding the instability of the assassins mental capacity is there a deeper frustration and mistrust of the political situation now being played out in our society? Are militias and such organizations geering up to react to the gridlocked and corrupt political process' in our...
by Steven Miller 7 years ago
Do we have anything to fear from the radical right?Do we have anything to fear from the radical right if they do not get power in the upcoming elections?
by Peeples 3 years ago
Why are there so many shootings by Police Officers? Would it help if they didn't have guns?In 2013 Iceland had it's first person killed by a police officer shooting. This is because they do not typically carry guns as POs. Their communities are pro guns for sport (hunting) and many people own them...
by Mike Russo 3 years ago
I know this is going to be controversial, but I'm deeply concerned about racism in this country. There seems to be many more shootings of unarmed black men by white police in the last few months. This latest shooting in Ferguson Missouri has me wondering, are these pent-up tensions...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|