Should terrorists be entitled to human rights?

Jump to Last Post 1-17 of 17 discussions (17 posts)
  1. Seeker7 profile image80
    Seeker7posted 13 years ago

    Should terrorists be entitled to human rights?

    For example, If a person has been involved in acts of terrorism should these deliberate acts automatically forfeit any human rights they may have been entitled to? Example -    a terrorist getting out of prison early because of terminal illness so he can be with his family? I use this because one of the Lockerbie bombers was released in my own country due to supposedly prostate cancer. The feelings of the Scottish people was anger at another terrorist being pampered (maybe because of money) when victims and their families are yet again slighted and forgotten.

  2. MickS profile image62
    MickSposted 13 years ago

    When society incarcerates a criminal, it suspends some of that person's human rights, it also suspends the human rights of those members of the family who are innocent of any criminal activity.  It is not just the compassion to the inmate who is dying, but also the compassion afforded those family members to spend last times with the patient.
    One of the things that sets society above the terrorist is compassion, if we abandon compassion we are no better than the murderer.

  3. nightwork4 profile image61
    nightwork4posted 13 years ago

    this is a tricky question. i don't think everyone that is deemed a terrorist is actually one first off. secondly when your a small group trying to fight a massively powerful military, terrorism may be the only way to do it. now if you are someone who sets up people to go into markets and just kill people randomly , you shouldn't go to prison, you should be shot.

  4. ptosis profile image66
    ptosisposted 13 years ago

    The definition of "unalienable rights," is those rights that cannot be surrendered, sold or transferred

    When the Tuscon Shooting happened recently - my friend said that he should be treated as a terrorist - I asked what different punishment would be given - He didn't know.   Each state has different laws in punishment.

    There is already a law on the books for extra punishment if kill a Federal Judge while in the course of duty.   When Obama said the Judge just came by "to visit his friend " - some critics argued that Obama had hurt the Fed's chances to give extra punishment to that crazy nut.

    Personally think the guy is crazy and not a terrorist - but that doesn't preclude a crazy terrorist.  Define insanity versus terrorist.   

    BTW: The real reason for letting go lifers when they get old & sick is NOT compassion but because of $$$$$$$ - the state does not want to pay for the medical bills - if released to family - no more medical coverage....

    Even Charlie Manson will be released - only to die from old age

  5. Wayne Brown profile image80
    Wayne Brownposted 13 years ago

    In terms of "human rights", I think you forfeit those when you consider such acts against humanity.  As for "humane treatment" which is what you may be implying, I think as Americans we are all for that in most instances.  I will not stand for human treatment as a shield to protect information that would save the lives of other Americans but otherwise I certainly can see a reasonable level of human treatment especially in the interim prior to conviction. WB

  6. wingedcentaur profile image64
    wingedcentaurposted 13 years ago

    If we fail to give human rights to human beings, no matter what they've done, can we fairly call ourselves human, then?

  7. peterxdunn profile image60
    peterxdunnposted 13 years ago

    There were originally two suspects that supposedly conspired together to plant the bomb on the 747 that exploded over Lockerbie. The case against one of them was dismissed out of court. The case against the remaining suspect hinged upon where the bomb was actually placed aboard the aircraft - the prosecution argued that the bomb was planted in Germany. However there was evidence - never presented in court - that a security cage: where the baggage was stored overnight, at Heathrow Airport was broken into on the night in question.

    Also, Scottish policemen - who were first on the scene on the night of the tragedy - also complained that entries in their notebooks were changed after the books were confiscated by the FBI.

    Something else that you need to consider is the difference between a 'freedom fighter' and a "terrorist'. A 'freedom fighter' is a 'terrorist' fighting on our side. A 'terrorist' is a 'freedom fighter' fighting on theirs.

    It 's a murky old world out there.

  8. Seeker7 profile image80
    Seeker7posted 13 years ago

    Thanks to all who have written so far.

    I'm not saying that I agree or disagree with the decison to release terrorist offenders early on compassionate grounds, I use it as an example. I would agree that if we do loose all compassion then we are no better than those who slaughter defenceless people. I don't think the real issue is, if they are terrorists or freedom fighters.
    But it does seem that in many cases there is a lot of talk and shouting about human rights for people who have deliberately taken human lives - whether they be terrorists or freedom fighters. But I do feel that the victims and their loved ones that are left behind are forgotten time and time again. They too are serving a sentence, but there is no release for them.

  9. shynsly profile image60
    shynslyposted 13 years ago

    One key issue might be the terrorist's own mentality... in the case of the Lockerbie bomber, that's a situation where the people affected by his actions should have had the final say, but he probably wasn't much of a risk anymore.

    In terms of terrorists such as Al Qaeda, keep in mind that these people are fanatics, should they be released in a situation like that, you can pretty well guarantee the first thing they're going to do is attempt another terrorist attack.

    I think the best answer I can personally offer is, A) it depends on your definition of "human rights" and, B) it depends on the individual situation... case by case.

    They should be given the basics they need to survive but are unable to provide for themselves in prison ... food, water, shelter, and medical treatment. Anything else beyond that is up for debate, to say the least.

  10. profile image0
    Butch Newsposted 13 years ago

    When we deny human rights for any reason we are no longer humans but animals.  Letting someone out of prison upon compassionate grounds is not a basic human right.  Human rights are about personal dignity, not torturing people, and a chance to live a life with some meaning.  If that means educating prisoners, and providing them with a future, what is wrong with that?

    Retribution is not going to solve an injustice nor make up for it.

    There are some who should never be set free but they should be given a chance of life with dignity.

  11. justom profile image59
    justomposted 13 years ago

    It would depend on your definition of a terrorist. You know what they man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter. I think the world banking system and wall streets greedy cronies are terrorists, just in disguise. Think about it!

  12. davidseeger profile image59
    davidseegerposted 13 years ago

    Before or after they are convicted by a court of law?

  13. Stump Parrish profile image60
    Stump Parrishposted 13 years ago

    The constitution and bill of rights applies equally to all in this country. Do any here feel that the punishment depends upon the terrorist act that was committed? In my opinion it matters not if it is the twin towers coming down or an abortion doctor being killed. The only thing that changes is the god ordering the murder. Of course a lot in America feel their god trumps all others and therefore, anything they do is for the glory of their god. Come to think of it it's the same with those who attack America due to the hundreds of thousands of innocent children we have murdered simply to keep the war machine churning out profits.

  14. profile image0
    wilbury4posted 13 years ago

    My simple answer is NO! But I think that many criminals, especially murderers and rapists should be denied most human rights. What rights did these people grant to their victims? Removing human rights is the punishment for the crimes that have been committed.

  15. smelloftruth profile image60
    smelloftruthposted 13 years ago

    That Lockerbie bomber was a mistake. If he was indeed dying, then to me he should at least given the last right. But the fact that he isn't, that thing turned the world upside down.

  16. legallchew profile image59
    legallchewposted 13 years ago

    Even if proven guilty, Human rights are "inherent and unalienable." thus, these cannot be take away from them despite their unthinkable acts, sadly.

  17. BiGVoNN profile image61
    BiGVoNNposted 13 years ago

    for me it's a BIG NO....... Because i my self is a victim of terrorism in saudi that change my life and my looks....... Visit my profile for my life story....


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)