Should Canada have extended it's Lybia mission?
were staying there for 3 more months, is it a good idea?
This is a really hard question. Morality says 'yes' but practicality and economics say 'no.'
If this were the 90s with excessive government surpluses, I would encourage the UN mission. It would also be easier to support if there was an easily defined objective, as we had in the first Iraq war. If the opposition were more organized and effective, it would be a better call. What you have right now is an intransigent dictator versus a poorly organized opposition.
We need to, as they say, shit or get off the pot. If we want to win, commit a large amount of money and tropps NOW. If we don't have the money or time for this, we should relegate our activities to advisement and material support. Right now, I don't think we have time and money for this. We should focus on creating jobs if that is at all possible.
No let this country and other countries govern themselves.
Morally and Practically - no. It's just another war of resource grabbing and financial control.
by AnnCee7 years ago
According to the New York Times:In the process many have formed some unusual bonds that reflect the singularly nonideological character of the Egyptian youth revolt, which encompasses liberals, socialists and members of...
by Jack Lee11 months ago
This question is addressed to the TDS crowd. What do I mean about this question? Suppose Trump achieve even 50% of his goals in the first two years.Suppose the economic policies lead to more jobs, better pay and...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.