Why can't we have a candidate that is fiscally conservative buy socially liberal?
Because no one is going to fund a candidate like that. The unions won't back him for the Democrats, and the Christians will not back him for a Republican. Libertarian is about as close as your are going to get and they don't do very well in elections.
While I may sympathize with your reluctance to see the power of the will of an informed population, this is precisely the type of thinking that opened the doors to the wolves in 1930s Deutschland. If a man is not going govern, the wolves will.
Libertarian aren't Libertarians either. They say "freedom for all"...except this here group.Women, in Ron Paul's case.
We can't have a candidate that is fiscally conservative but socially liberal because of a fundamental difference in conservatism and liberalism itself in America. Conservatives here believe in smaller government and do not believe in the power of a group. Rather, they believe in the power of the individual to make his own decisions and affect his own course in life. Thus, there is no need to spend money on society when the individual can sustain himself. The logical conclusion is fiscal conservatism.
On the other hand, you have liberals in America who believe that the group more than anything affects the individual. Whatever happens to an individual is the result of the decisions of the people around him. Thus, there is a desire to provide a social safety net, welfare, and so on for those who have fallen too far.
That's why you can't have a candidate that embodies both these ideologies. It would lead to a contradiction in the fundamental philosophy of what governs the life of an individual, not to mention appearing on both sides of the fence doesn't bode well with your camp.
Thank you michiganman, that was a pretty insightful answer. You are probably right about that.
lovemychris, would you be so kind as to explain what you mean by Ron Paul not wanting freedom for women? I haven't heard anything about his policies that would be discrimenatory against women that aren't similar to that of the other republicans.
Edbert, when I say socially liberal, I don't mean financial safety nets or entitilements. I mean issues that are fundementally religious in nature, like gay marriage and abortion. Issues like prayer in public school, and teaching creationism as science. We had a debate where pretty much every single one of the Republican candidates stated that they don't believe in evolution, a theory widely excepted in all scientific circles.
I guess my question should have been why does fiscal conservatism have to go hand in hand with religious ideology?
by John Coviello 8 years ago
Is Raising Gasoline Taxes Fiscally Conservative?Read my hub "Is Raising Gasoline Taxes Fiscally Conservative?" and decide what is the most prudent way for government to fund transportation projects.
by mintinfo 6 years ago
What makes you a Conservative or a Liberal?Did you make a choice based on your personal world views and ideals or did you follow the opinions of others based on race, culture, family or friends?
by Scott Belford 17 months ago
Commonly, those people who call themselves conservative hold socialism and communism as being the end-state of liberalism. I would argue that there is nothing "liberal" about socialism and communism. Think about it, the fundamental engine behind both is the need for the...
by Holle Abee 8 years ago
In a recent poll, Romney edges out Obama in 2012. What really surprised me is that Huckabee and Obama are almost tied in the poll. Palin didn't fair as well. I hope she takes this to heart! Did you read what Mama Bush said about Palin? "She seems happy in Alaska - I hope she stays...
by Alexander A. Villarasa 5 years ago
The eminent essayist, author and political commentator Charles Krauthammer posited that the ongoing persistence of the disaster that is ObamaCare, could or would start the unraveling of American Liberalism and Progressivism. Quite a leap this idea of Krauthammer's , liberals have...
by Kathryn L Hill 11 months ago
In the name of justice, the founding fathers of this nation's constitution encouraged the formation of a democratic republic for the establishment of a self-governing nation. They distrusted pure democracy and this distrust is reflected in The Constitution. It was a basic premise of the founders...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|