Should America reduce its nuclear arsenal without mandating the same reduction from Russia or China?
The US has a substantially larger nuclear arsenal than those countries. Who ever thought China had any interest in atacking the US (its greaest trade partner) with nuclear weapons?
Our nuclear arsenals represent an old west gunslinger showdown where each has 50 arms and holds bazookas in every one. I think it is probably safe to put a few of them down. Of course, it is better if both sides put them down, but even if it is only us, at least we will be saving money and reducing the amount of existing weapons.
It's pretty hard, though, to ask anyone to reduce their arsenals while we continue to pursue missile defense.
Why wasn't our reduction in nuclear bombs used as a leveraging tool to get another nation, perhaps Russia, to reduce their numbers. Wouldn't that have been a win-win situation?
I suspect they will follow suit even without pressure. They have less economic capacity to maintain their stockpile/deterrent posture than we do. Who knows, maybe not pressuring them will work better since they won't have to appear weak.
To the contrary, Russia now has new mobile nuclear missiles deployed in Cuba since May 11, 2012. Reminds me of 1962!
In today's world, I don't think nukes in Cuba would really matter. Mutually assured destruction is more than guaranteed. Cuba nukes wouldn't alter that.
The USA can do what it likes in its policies. It has no right to tell other independant countries how to govern their policies. I only knew you were refering to the USA, because of the sub-heading, USA Politics. Other than that, there is no indication to which of the many American countries you were refering.
I have read that in recent years the Russians have felt let down by the U.S. and NATO since they have been creating "a buffer zone around Russia," or missile shield, involving in this process Central Europe, the Baltic states, Ukraine and the Caucasuses. Therefore, they have now deployed new mobile nuclear missiles in Cuba. Russia feels let down because in 2001, they withdrew weapons from Cuba when the U.S. assured them that this would confirm the Cold War was over with both getting rid of the relics of the Cold War, and building a new relationship based on cooperation and transparency. However, the thing with NATO in recent years took place after 9/11. It seems quite a challenge for both sides to keep their agreements to disarm at the same time, in light of the other threats in the world, besides Russia. I would think the same to be true were this having to do with China.
by Scott Belford 2 years ago
I lived through the fear of nuclear war between the old Soviet Union and America. I remember practicing what to do in elementary school in case of an attack. I remember the television commercials advertising bomb shelters. I remember the Missile Crisis.And now, Vladimir Putin...
by Ken Burgess 21 months ago
Will North Korea's hostilities actually unite Russia, China, and America together in a alliance?A question was asked "Do you want nuclear war with North Korea and China?" by promisem. Of course no one wants Nuclear war, but what are we going to do about a tiny nation that exists in...
by Susie Lehto 19 months ago
"The tables have turned and what was once the media’s favorite message — President Donald Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election — has now grown silent.Apparently, it’s Bill and Hillary Clinton who’ve been doing the behind-scenes and suspicious dealings with Russia all...
by Deforest 6 years ago
With the Pentagon's global missile shield and the encirclement of Russia and its allies, is the US intending to see what will be its "enemies"' reactions if it launches first a nuclear attack? Does it mean that it is its intentions? Why are we provoking them? Once again, who is the...
by Dr Freddie Haddox 2 years ago
Are Americans in a state of denial concerning the real probability for Nuclear war? Putin will fight
by Arthur Russ 2 days ago
Why Are so Many Americans in Denial of Human’s Contribution to Climate Change, and the Harm its Doing to the Planet?The evidence is so clear, just to name a few:-• The correlation between the burning of fossil fuel since the start of the Industrial Revolution and the increase in...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|