Does a debate really matter?
when I watch political debates, most times I think that whomever wins is just better at lying quickly.it's not always the case but i'd rather a leader who thinks before they speak then one who seems to have an answer for everything right away.
Depends on what kind of debate and within which settings.Debates done the right way allow for the airing of issues that no one wants to face and forces people to look deeper for solutions to certain problems.
If the debate is all about inflaming passions however, it can cause wars, literally.
A political debate is nothing more than a few moments of yapping. I look at their records. Their records show who they are and what they will do in the future.
I hope you see it clearly. If you're only looking at the Corporate Party media, then you're missing the bigger picture.
I also value someone who thinks before they speak and has the facts. As far as debates, I think that in undecided voter's minds, it may make a difference. It appears that when people make up their minds on this, they aren't going to flip flop. If voters change their minds it would be due to be an enormous screw up that came out of the candidate's mouth. I prefer to vote on the issues that are important to me while looking at each candidate's records, ALL candidates records.
Too bad the Corporate Party media controls how you perceive our politicians. The only flaw in their "armor" is the Internet.
In other countries the people who watch it on TV call it the '' peacock fight ''
A peacock fight would be more interesting. At least you know that the peacocks are genuine in their fighting. Obama and Romney are both working for the new Corporatocracy -- both are Goldman-Sachs stooges.
I don't think it matters who wins. But I do think it's a great chance to see our potential leaders thinking on their feet, and hearing what they have to say with their own words. It seems more real to me than visiting their Facebook pages, or listening to their press statements, to give examples. These are things that are premeditated and thought-through; chances are, they practice and rehearsed what they said. And who knows if it's actually Obama posting on Obama's Facebook? To me, this is real, concrete proof of who they are as people.
Political debates should be formal debates in which downgrading an opponent is a "no-no". It should be statements of facts in black and white and devoid of opinions and hear-says. The opposing parties should drop all intents and objectives of getting most of the votes from the populace in order to win; wise voters would detect such mentality through the manner of speaking and the behavior of the persons in question.
My answer would then be; A debate matters so much because it shows the personality, intellect, and integrity of the opposing parties; then I will have basis to make my decision. But, if the debate is "non-sense" and does not follow standard procedures then that would be such a joke. Jokes will have its proper place and time, not in politics where lives of the electorate should be taken seriously by the leaders.
When I watch debates I notice that none of them answer questions directly, they all dance around the subject and give some long winded response that barely touches on the actual answer.
It's like watching kids being questioned by their parents "Now I noticed that there is a cookie missing from the jar. Can you tell me exactly what happened to it?"
Political response "Well, I think what needs to be done is to look at the surrounding cookies to determine how large of an impact the space left by this alleged missing cookie has left. Perhaps by sampling another cookie we could then determine the texture and flavor to better understand what might provoke someone to take a cookie. Your other child will tell you that we need to look at this in a different way, he'll tell you that..."
That's NOT an answer! DUDE!!!
An answer would be "Yes, I know what happened to the cookie. Sam took it and ate it under the table. I told him not to but he did it anyway."
OR "Yes, I know what happened to the cookie. I ate it because it looked good."
Can we get a direct answer here people?
Watch the 3rd Party debates online, October 23.
they don't change the minds of people who've already decided, but they do pull in high ratings which allows networks to charge advertisers more. This year we've had two presidential and one vice presidential debates, three total. That's not about keeping the public informed, that's about milking sponsors for all they're worth.
On debates in general, I think debate really matters only when the discussion is honest and open. I've learned a great deal from such debates.
As for the political debates on television for the presidential race, I think it's garbage. Both Rombama and Obamney are puppets for the Corporate Party -- both Goldman-Sachs stooges. Count on either one of them to go along with another bailout or two or some equally inane policy.
If Romney gets elected, I think he'll continue in Obama's insane legacy of murder by Executive Order (including American citizens), signing laws that allow for the indefinite detention of American citizens without charges, wars of corporate greed, ignoring the Constitution. In fact, I'm getting rather fed up with politicians marginalizing and even demonizing the Constitution -- effectively committing treason.
I love the honesty of Dr. Ron Paul. The worst thing about him is a couple of articles that someone else wrote and unscrupulous news reporters try to shackle him with. Such is the "spin" mentality of today's Corporate Party media whores.
There is one debate coming up for the 3rd Party candidates. Now that could prove interesting. October 23, online. I've avoided the Demopublican vs. Republicrat farce, but the 3rd Party debates have my interest. They're not puppets on a script.
If you didn't catch both halves of the Corporate Party presidential conventions, you should see the following two clips. Politics has died and the body politic has become a putrid stench on the land.
America used to be the land of the free and the home of the brave.
Now, Americans are, for the most part, blind and enslaved cowards.
Is it the case that the "media" are trying to promote each Presidential candidate as a sort of Hollywood star? Is that a good way to select a President? I.e., on the basis of their looks, glamor appeal, photogenicity? What about that person's education, ability to peruse a Balance Sheet, apply good discipline and honor to all of his/her work, regardless of whether the decisions are politically popular or not?
Who does anyone in the electorate believe? Do you believe what this newspaper or TV station says, or that magazine, or that person over the saloon bar?
How do you make your decision on whom to vote for?
by FitnezzJim 6 years ago
Should the Commission on Presidential Debates lose its tax-exempt status?Politico.com is reporting (September 2, 2016) that the Libertarian VP nominee claims the Commission on Presidential Debates could lose tax exempt status by excluding Libertarians from the 2016 presidential debates. The...
by John Coviello 11 years ago
Perhaps Iowa can help a candidate gain some momentum or conversely lose momentum. But in the grand scheme of things Does Iowa Really Matter to U.S. Presidential Politics? It is not a large or diverse state, and does not represent voting patterns very well. What do you think?
by dashingscorpio 8 years ago
Have you ever changed your voting plans based upon a presidential debate?Do you believe any presidential debate could cause a conservative to vote for a liberal or vice versa? Are these really "sporting events" for voters to cheer for (their team) whenever their "person" gets...
by ga anderson 3 years ago
Here we go. Debate #2 Day #2 of the Democrat Candidates Debate.Hey, The National DNC speaker, (he also spoke last night - the first night of debates), is a great speaker. What an energetic guy. He is very well suited to his job.Pre-debate hubbub is about whether Biden can shake the "old...
by Mike Russo 6 years ago
The current debate format is a farce and is nothing more than a slug fest that we watch. The moderators have little to no control over the debaters. John Donvan has a petition that proposes change the current format to the Oxford style format where the debates are done in a civil manner...
by Bianca Chel'le Tate 5 years ago
Do All Lives REALLY Matter?
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2023 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|