Has the threat of a weapons ban prompted you to purchase an assault rifle, magazine, and ammunition?
While there is a threat of a new or reinstated Federal assault weapons ban and a new ban in effect in New York, there has yet to be a definitive answer to the question as to whether or not a ban will be enacted. With that said, 4.7 million guns have been sold in the past couple of months triggering a shortage of inventory in gun stores. Gun manufacturers have ceased production until a decision is made about a ban so they are not stuck with unsellable inventory. Is it possible that the plan was to boost the economy by creating a run on guns and ammo adding of billions dollars to the economy?
I personally cannot afford to buy an AR at the moment, but if I had the money I would in a heartbeat.
No! Assault weapons should be banned. And every person who applies for a gun permit and registration should pass a background check.
When someone told me to mail a gun permit request for him and fill it out. He did not get the permit. I enclosed a copy of his discharge papers from the Army.
I believe in guns for protection, sport and hunting. I grew up with guns in the house and my grandfather taught all his grandkids to shoot and to hit what we aimed at. That was hand guns, shotguns and rifles. He also taught us to respect them and never aim unless we were prepared to shoot.
Shyron has no clue as to what a "assault weapon" is supposed to be. But she wants them banned anyway. And this is the voice of "common sense."
If that was the plan it was a poorly thought out and executed one. Nothing was added to the economy by the massive paranoia infused gun grab. It simply put gun shops out of stock on many items and the manufacturers afraid to make more yet. It wasn't any sort of stimulus to the economy. If the supply had held out then it still would have mostly benefited the gun manufacturers and not the economy in general.
You are right about the benefits. But, just imagine if G.W.Bush had kept the assault weapons ban imposed by President Clinton, maybe it would have saved some or all of the New Town, CT victims.
Shyreon doesn't know or doesn't care that it was perfectly legal to buy or sell a virtually identical rifle during the AWB to anyone who could pay for one. But she comments anyway in her ignorance.
No, it has never prompted me to do anything like purchase an assault. But I think it might to those that are avid gun collectors.
If I had the money, I would have already purchased another rifle and a new handgun. The ammunition is a given since I'd already be on my way to the firing range with each of my weapons. They should be fired at least once a year and I clean them once a month to keep myself aquainted with them. My husband is always at my side telling me what each piece does, why its there, and trying to improve my aim. Threats are always in place and we should be ready for them.
It is possible, but I hope that's not what happened.
I do not own a gun, but I believe those that desire one, and go through the legal system, should have them.
Nope. I didn't want a tactical rifle before the (possible) ban, and I don't want one now. No need for it, and ammo is expensive. Further, I don't think they're all that useful for home defense.
A police officer friend once told me the best weapon for home defense is a pump-action shotgun, 'cos if an intruder hears you rack that pump, he's going to get scared and leave before you can make an enormous hole in his body. (His words, not mine.)
Remember the gun and ammo shortage after Obama was first elected? The Right was convinced that Obama was going to make it harder to get guns. After he was elected, everyone rushed to buy guns, and pretty soon all the inventory was bought up, and it became really hard to get a gun. Then the radical right said, "See!? Told you if Obama was elected it'd be harder to get guns!" Hilarious.
I do believe there is more to this topic than meets the eye. I do believe the possibility that it was a stunt to boost the economy is quite a good one. I live in New York where they just passed laws on limiting clip size and other topics making a felony a quite simple crime, without intention or with neglect to sell trhje illegal clips youown now. I do not own a gun of any kind. I do not intend to own a gun anytime soon. I do know a handful of gun owners who own them the purposes of hunmting and target shooting and they are mostly upset over the fact that they are having their seciond amendment rights tampered with.
not tampering with the second amendment, if they make people have background checks, that would prevent a lot of senseless shootings. Don't have to give up your guns.
Yes, shyron, because 99.999 percent of people who own guns don't do harm we should make them spend tens of billions of dollars on background checks while those criminals who DON'T obey laws ignore your silly law and still hurt people.
by PrettyPanther 24 months ago
March 23, 2021WASHINGTON — Faced with the second mass shooting in a week, President Biden and Democrats on Capitol Hill called on Tuesday for fast action to enact stricter gun laws, a plea that was immediately met with a blockade of opposition by Republicans.In brief, somber remarks from the White...
by Mike Russo 5 years ago
Ask the 59 people who were killed and the 525 people who were wounded and all of those who were traumatized by this horrific event, if we need gun control. Why does any civilian need access to assault weapons? The problem is the mentally ill are an unknown quantity until after they commit the...
by Don Bobbitt 7 years ago
It has become so tiresome seeing all of the radicals on both sides of the Gun Control issue, eacn proposing some "master plan" to control the sale of guns in America. Why can't we do this in "baby steps"?For instance, assault rifles! Just tell me who can justify owning an...
by strengthcourageme 8 years ago
I was just wondering everyone's thoughts on gun control, are you for or against?
by thomasczech 9 years ago
Gun Grab North America .In your opinion, are the anti gun groups going too far, or not far enough?The governments of both, United States and Canada, along with the anti gun groups are pushing for tighter restrictions of firearms and an all out ban on certain guns. However, those who have firearms...
by ga anderson 3 years ago
Beto O'Ruarke put it out there, center stage:"Hell Yes we're going to take your guns away, your Ar-15s, your AK-47s . . ."Regardless of how you feel about the issue of "assault " rifles, how do you think this will sit with non-progressive and anti-gun citizens?A couple of...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2023 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|