Cars kill people, should we ban them too?
Forget that the driver may have been drunk, playing with his cell phone, not paying attention, or suffering from road rage. The car killed the person! So...we should just ban these killing machines, right? Keep in mind that although we are all not bad drivers, one bad apple spoils the bunch!
Owning a car requires a registration. It also requires a license to drive. It also must have annual inspections. It's primary function is not to kill something. Cars are also bigger than a breadbox and we can see them; so they can't be concealed.
We have 11 million illegals here and many of them drive cars, and trucks. They didn't have licenses. Passenger Vehicles while not designed to kill, are responsible 3,613,732 motor vehicle fatalities in the United States from 1899 to 2013.
Guns are just objects, Its how and by whom they are used that is the issue.
Terrorists are already able to use bombs, If you stop them from getting guns they will set off more bombs. They will not stop until every American is dead, handle the real problem and stop using these attacks to push gun control.
Cars serve a main function that is not to kill things.
You also have to pass a knowledge and abilities test to drive one, as well as renew a license every few years.
But ignoring all of that, I'd rather be in a building that a person with a car tries to drive into than a building where a person walks in with an assault rifle. A car trying to run you over in the middle of a movie theatre or a church or a school or a club is going to be a heck of a lot easier to see and get away from.
And I don't think anyone wants to ban guns outright, do they? Just make it harder to get them and limit what kinds you can easily get your hands on. Canada has strict gun laws but approximately 1/4 Canadians own guns. People who really want them and are fit to have them can still do so with stricter gun laws.
I am sorry to be slightly off topic off this, however, this did remind me of a "slight" car ban initiative which switched from a ban to a change in the manufacturing of a car. I also want to say this comment is in no way making light of any disabilities. In the 1990s when electric cars were becoming more popular, one of the selling points of the car was the smooth "quiet" ride. Heck, I remember the first time I rode in one I could not believe the engine was on as I was so used to the noise of a gas combustion engine. Anyway, there was a group who wanted to ban the electric car because it posed a hazard to blind pedestrians who relied on hearing to help them cross the street. I could not believe someone would even try to bring this ban up. However, I spoke to a blind person who agreed and asked if I ever tried walking blind. I told him "no." He then challenged me to walk blind in my neighborhood, which I though I knew so well. I blindfolded myself, and he and two other friends walked with me while I used a stick to help navigate. Needless to say I was a utter fool during this experiment. It was actually comical as my friends roasted me senseless. However, I got to see how things I so easily dismiss as so senseless like banning "quiet vehicles" have a rational basis to someone else. I still did not support a ban on "quieter vehicles" however, I learned to pause before dismissing as senseless another person's thoughts. Different experiences and perceptions shape the way we see, or in my case not see the world. I am assuming this discussion is in regards to a possible ban on assault rifle and assault rifle style weaponry. I admit I am an avid 2nd amendment right supporter. However, I also know that when the Assault Weapons bill from 1994-2004 was in effect, homicides dropped dramatically, and then shot up when the law was allowed to sunset. I am not for an outright ban on everything, however, anything which can reduce the number of gun related casualties I am for. I remember when people fought "gun trigger locks" when children were shooting themselves with guns which were lying around the house. Heck, this still happens today. However, for even one child who got a hold of a gun and could not shoot it due to the trigger lock law which took so long to pass, then I am happy if I have to spend money for each gun I own and to lock it up.
We are talking about Terrorist Mass Shootings, not homicides. Have of the gun deaths in the US are suicides. With over 300 million people in the US, the deaths from Terrorists a small fraction less than 1%. But the idea of Terrorist attacks is big
The original poster's statement never said anything about whether this is pertaining to "only" terrorist mass shootings, shootings in general, homicides, etc. .
Banning guns in France didn't stop a Muslim from stabbing a French police officer the day of the Orlando attacks.
Banning guns hasn't stopped Muslim mobs from lynching Christians in Egypt and using machetes to kill atheists in Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Muslim suicide bombers in Madrid, Brussels, Paris, Moscow didn't need guns to kill a lot of people. Ditto the Boston bombers.
Banning guns doesn't stop Mexico's cartels from killing at least 50,000 people in the past 15 years.
The problem isn't guns - it is the ideology that drives people to murder, and in most cases, it is fundamentalist Islam.
The gvt of Israel took all Palestinian peoples guns.How come you support that?Isn't it a hypocritical stance to say don't take my guns, but it's ok to take theirs? &Everything you mentioned was a false flags event done by the Right Wing Zionazi c
The Palestinian conflict with Israel ends when Muslims recognize the right of Israel to exist. They don't, so the Israel, the only secular democracy in the Middle East, continues to fight for its right to life.
You believe that hogwash? I'm surprised with the internet, anyone still feels that way. Israel steals their land, took away their self defense and allows Palestinians to be murdered Scott free.Google Price Tag terror.For real terrorism ignored by all
by Don Bobbitt 2 years ago
It has become so tiresome seeing all of the radicals on both sides of the Gun Control issue, eacn proposing some "master plan" to control the sale of guns in America. Why can't we do this in "baby steps"?For instance, assault rifles! Just tell me who can justify owning an...
by The Medicine Man 4 years ago
Some Say:" Guns Don't Kill People do" But Aren't Guns Weapons Created To Kill?
by Mike Russo 9 months ago
Ask the 59 people who were killed and the 525 people who were wounded and all of those who were traumatized by this horrific event, if we need gun control. Why does any civilian need access to assault weapons? The problem is the mentally ill are an unknown quantity until after they commit the...
by Jeff Berndt 6 years ago
I just noticed something about the Fast and Furious controversy.Leaving aside the question of whether the operation was a good idea or not (I think not), I noticed that the Left and the Right have both seemed to flip-flop on their usual arguments about gun control.The Left usually wants to restrict...
by flacoinohio 4 years ago
Has the threat of a weapons ban prompted you to purchase an assault rifle, magazine, and ammunition?While there is a threat of a new or reinstated Federal assault weapons ban and a new ban in effect in New York, there has yet to be a definitive answer to the question as to whether or not a ban will...
by Michelle Zunter 2 years ago
More gun violence very close to where I live yesterday. Most weapons, including guns, are available to anyone in this country at any given time. But what about the people who are using the guns? Are they mentally ill? are they psychopaths? Are they terrorists? Are they all of the above? In any...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|