To whom, do you think the speech was the most effective? Was he talking to the "left", the "right", the "moderate" or to the rest of the world with complete disregard to his own people?
Personally, I believe that this was the first time that the President actually spoke of his own countries interest while giving a speech in a foreign country. However, my analysis would be that he was to weak for the right, to strong for the left and didnt appeal to the moderate at all. He mentioned that "Americas commitment to global security is unwavering", this sounds alot like the Bush Doctrine. I bet that really set well with his base. His new ideaology that war is sometimes neccesary is quite true, but again this is not the stand that he took during the campaign.
The best quote from his speech was the same thing that he said at West Point. He said that he "prohibited torture." He may not know this but torture was prohibited by the Geneva Convention in 1949. He may have defined Waterboarding as torture, but he did not lead talks at the Geneva Convention. He seems to like to take credit for those things that he hasnt done.
I hope that he makes the decisions that are best for the people of this country, but I am unsure that he has the intelligence or the "Audacity" to actually make the tough decisions in spite of what he thinks others will think of him.
It didn't sound to me like he was talking to either side, just to Americans and the world in general.
thats what I got from it. Its like he is trying to justify himself to those he promised "hope". They bought it, and they still believe him.
I think I will be getting the next nobel prize for "things I'm planning on doing". So when that happens, you will know who I really am.
It was akin to an Oscar speech. It was patronising and condescending. He was talking to a European audience who didn't need such rhetoric and could easily see through the veneer.
This award is a travesty, politically motivated, and devalues the essence of it's founder.
I stopped listening to presidents' speeches in the Bush administration, and I haven't listened to Obama since he's been elected. (Don't mind me, I'm in "a mood". - but it's true. I don't listen to presidents these days.
by Ralph Deeds5 years ago
Ryan is a compelling public speaker. He did a convincing job of supporting Romney, but his attacks on Obama were lies and misrepresentations:1. He criticized Obama for not acting on the Simpson-Bowles Commission's...
by egiv8 years ago
I can't wait to read about how big of a joke the (Norwegian) Nobel Prize selecting committee is and that since nazi Germany loved Hitler and so many love Obama, it logically makes Obama Hitler.Can you people be proud...
by mbuggieh4 years ago
CNN Reports:"The Higgs boson [particle] which was discovered last year, garnered two physicists the Nobel Prize in physics on Tuesday, but it didn't go to the scientists who detected it. Nearly 50 years ago,...
by peterxdunn5 years ago
There is now clear evidence (mainly from Iraq) that the radioactive residues left by the use of depleted uranium weapons (such as the armour piercing rounds fired by the American Abrahms main battle tank) cause...
by Jean Bakula5 years ago
I thought Mrs. Romney was very artificial and stiff. The things she said about all the roles we women play were true, but more for our Mother's generation. She was discussing things like helping the kids write the book...
by Dave Mathews5 years ago
Three weeks ago I was prohibited from giving answers in the "Answer" Section, because I offended some bleeding heart, with something I said in an answer. I did not swear or call names, they just didn't like...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.