Do you believe that truth should triumph over propaganda that is spread as truth?
How do you recognize propaganda? Do you discover it as the presenter introduces it to the audience? Do you recognize it as a ploy by the speaker presenting what the audience members desire to hear? Corrupt politicians, media manipulators, truth-benders, pretenders, and lie-baiters seem to be happy with their propaganda scandals as they continue to spread their lies. This is an attempt to repeat it often enough so the masses will regard it as the truth. What should be done to curtail such illicit activity?
Well, first, if your question reads "do you believe that truth should triumph over propaganda", I doubt that anyone will come saying "No".
But second, let's make it clear that propaganda isn't synonymous with lies. It's important to clarify that someone who uses propaganda isn't necessarily lying. They're just presenting one side of the argument.
As to how to recognize it, I would say not to take anything at face-value. Explore, read from different sources, ask people, research.
The truth of the matter is that propaganda has been around since ancient times, and I don't think it will disappear. Virtually every politician, government, movement, etc. has used it one way or the other because it's the safest way to influence people into agreeing with you.
propaganda is not synonymous with truth. it is based on presenting anything but truth. therefore, propaganda is a lie. propaganda will not disappear until individuals start following the truth.
Look for the definition of propaganda in a dictionary and tell me if it says anything about lies.
looked at the definition - never saw the word truth referred or stated in the definition. therefore, propaganda is a lie.
LOL, Ok, I don't think I have much more to contribute here
Typical of those who cannot accept truth. That is why the USA is drowning in debt, suffering from inadequate leadership, and heading further into recession. The nation is doomed if the citizens continue to follow the irrational corrupt politicians.
You obviously have an agenda and can't answer questions objectively. So I don't see what's the point. Good luck with your campaign.
Truth does not require an agenda. It stands above all other attempt to deceive. If it is not truth-it is a lie. Truth always triumphs because it requires no lying support.
If truth can stand on its own, why do you feel the need to reinforce it over and over again? By saying 'truth' more than 16 times in this question it's making you sound like the paranoid conspiracy theorist that needs to confirm it to himself, not us
your question "why do you feel the need to reinforce it over and over again?"
is relatively very appropriate since 65% of the citizens of the USA do not follow the truth. The reason for the repetitive nature is so that those who do not follow it will
That would make sense to me if you were saying "gravity is a real scientific process" rather than "Obey the truth because truth is truth".
I think logic should triumph, frankly. Not sure of the context of this particular question as it does seem to have political overtones.
I wouldn't be too concerned with those who seek to promote illogical beliefs; they generally tend to be discredited.
"What is truth?" - Pontius Pilate.
Funny though, Jesus never answered him and remained silent. Maybe he was just tired of repeating himself?
37 ...Jesus answered, “You say that I am a king. In fact, the reason I was born and came into the world is to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth listens to me.” 38 “What is truth?” retorted Pilate. then he went out again to the Jews
Ideally, facts would always win out, but the Mark Twain quote holds true: "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting it's shoes on." For me, there are numerous ways to confirm the validity of something. The first is the source and whether or not it's reputable. The second is confirmation of the same information from other, unrelated sources. And the third is through non-profit fact checking organizations. However, that's just the basics and knowing what is accurate and what isn't will be based largely on logic, critical thinking and a good deal of perspective.
Untrustworthy sources tend to be those that jump to conclusions, make extreme associations and repeat the word 'truth' over and over again in an attempt to jam a cylindrical peg into a square hole. Negative propaganda often survives through well funded repetition.
by Christin Sander 4 years ago
Do all governments use fear and hatred to push their own agendas?Is there such thing as a wholly non-corrupt government, or do they all manipulate people with propaganda? Do you think it would be possible to truly have a government "of and for the people" - or is corruption completely...
by Deforest 4 years ago
What a joke! We've been fed lies over and over.Pierre-Henry Bunel, former French military intelligence quoted "The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public...
by Charles James 6 years ago
I saw this as a rhetorical response in another thread, and just could not resist starting a topic about it.I gather, from time well spent within several ministries, wrapped around the compilations, that perhaps the reason people can only believe what the book says is due to a genuine lack of...
by Scott S Bateman 15 months ago
At least that's what Trump supporters thought. It turns out NPR tweeted the Declaration of Indepdence on the 4th of July.https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the … 4da2b6b9f5Are we as a country becoming more divided and ignorant than ever?
by Mike Russo 20 months ago
What do you call the media that is not the "Main Stream Media?"ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, et, al are called the main stream (or as some people call it "Lame Stream") media. What do you call, Fox News, Breitbart, Drudge Report, Alt Right, et al? And how does one...
by sannyasinman 5 years ago
Now a proven paedophile, UK celebrity and close friend of Prince Charles, Jimmy Savile was also a supplier of children to be abused by the rich, royal and powerful eilte of the UK. http://21stcenturywire.com/2012/10/15/j … e-cesspit/He said of himself that he was untouchable, and could...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|