I saw this as a rhetorical response in another thread, and just could not resist starting a topic about it.
I gather, from time well spent within several ministries, wrapped around the compilations, that perhaps the reason people can only believe what the book says is due to a genuine lack of experience. Yes, I call that experience practical faith. A genuine and true experience of what the texts mention (briefly, I might add) and the many instances, not even apart of the texts.
I fully understand how easy it is to get caught up in the tide of memorized chapter and verse, because the texts are quite intriguing, often vivid and certainly hold the attention. In truth, the texts of science and sensation continue to grip humanity without mercy.
Perhaps also the reason anti-theists (atheists) are a very much hell-bent on "calling the text-worshipers out". But they too lack that genuine experience.
Could it be the reason they now cling to other texts, prophets and mechanics?
Is it logical to assume then, both sides of this belief-in-a-book-system can join forces and seek out this practical experience, to prove the case and dissolve the gorge that greatly divides them? Wouldn't it make more sense to be a united front for Truth?
I don't see how there could be a united front for truth. Neither hard core theists or atheists are searching for it. They swear they've already found it.
Plus nothing breeds solidarity like good ol' "us vs. them."
Of course there is. But, that has to do with our understanding of the physical world. You don't recognize the possibility of the spiritual, so you probably don't understand where James was going with this.
I have an understanding of my center, the whole is not to be found in religion but in the folds of the self. That's how it is for me, but I can't say this for anyone else. As individuals, we generally choose to follow a conditioned path or one that suits an attitude.
Yes, I recognize the possibility of a great many things, however when there is no shred of evidence whatsoever for such things, then where can one possibly gain any understanding of it?
Leave me alone ATM. I'm not in the mood for your games today. Your whole post contradicts itself. If you recognize the possibilities of something, then you can't automatically claim it is completely impossible to ever gain an understanding. If you aren't searching (as is your disposition) of course you will never be in a position to find anything out. One has to search 'with eyes wide open' in order to hope that one will find something that will ultimately be proven to have some substance.
Out of curiosity; when was the idea of the atom first written about? How many centuries was it until we had proof that an atom existed?
WHAT? You're the one following me around repeating the word 'asinine' like some pirate parrot.
That makes no sense at all. You need evidence to gain understanding.
"Eyes wide open" is nothing without evidence.
What does that have to do with anything? Strawman.
A pirate parrot??? I enjoyed that one immensely.
Look, I realize you will simply poo poo this observation, but there are those of is who believe that, perhaps, there is more to life than meets the eye.
Sue me for being interested in listening to others and trying to find a unifying thread of truth. But, be ye warned. Parrots don't care what atheists think anyway.
Yes, I know, and that belief has failed miserably for many centuries and continues to fail and do little more than cause conflicts. Your observation doesn't deserve poo poo as it is entirely a moot point.
Failed miserably for centuries?
Listening to others is a failure? Listening to others causes conflict?
Kudos on spelling moot correctly, though. The number of people who type mute instead is mind boggling.
Yes, exactly. And, unless you can give an example of anyone throughout history that has ever discovered something that is "more to life than meets the eye" then you have absolutely no argument.
ATM. To parrot another pirate, I'll simply say I'm not sticking my nose in your rat hole. In every conversation we have had, you summarily dismiss anything that doesn't support your argument.
Why in the world would I waste energy on trying to convince you to agree with me? It doesn't make a difference to me one way or the other what you think of me, or my opinion. It's my opinion. Not yours.
So, until the moment comes that one of us has proof positive to substantiate our conclusions (yours apparently firmly held...mine open to new information) we are dealing in opinions. Does it bother you so very much that I'm not willing to revamp mine to be a mirror image of yours?
So, you have absolutely nothing to offer in regards to what has been provided that is "more to life than meets the eye" - you could have just said so rather than beating around the bush.
I have nothing that will suit your fancy. But, I didn't offer to attempt to enlighten you. I'm not so egotistical as to think I could. Unlike you though, I don't think the world is full of delusional liars. People have felt things that interest me. That's why I'm here. I'm interested. Why are you here?
Since I posted the question, I thought I'd elaborate on my stance... How, if one is to disaprove of any adverse knowledge, wrong fro doing so? How is it, tha a book written by men, the authority on God? How is any one person as such?
Could you elaborate on what you mean by "genuine experience?"
In my experience, it has come to my attention that there are more liars than honest people in the world today. And if we take a look at history, then we will see even more liars than honest people even with past events.
People who choose to lie because of their own ego and ignorance, and lack understanding of their own life, are the main problem. Those who claim life is so complex isn't speaking truth. Those who claim that no one can understand or know truth are others among those who don't speak truth either.
Many of those who claim truth know nothing about truth because their own words are masked by their own ego more often than not. I'm sure these people would probably be the ones who would recognize truth when revealed, but wouldn't admit it publicly because it challenges their own comfortableness with regards to their own fears related to living life.
I don't care what the bible has to say because it's a mixed up book thrown together to achieve control over a growing population which was growing so fast in awareness that it was safer to include Jesus' teachings within "religion" and create "Christianity" before anyone realized what they had done.
Anyone who does enough research into the bible would know this providing they don't dismiss things which they are not comfortable with learning about.
I believe that every word that has ever been written, was written by inspiration. Every word ever spoken, divine.
by graceinus 5 years ago
How do we know if we understand the correct context when we study the Holy Bible?I have often wonder why we sometimes if not often misunderstand the context of chapters and/or verses when we study God's word. One can read a verse or chapter a number of times believing they understand it's meaning ,...
by Melissa Barrett 5 years ago
I have said many times that what you seek in the bible you shall find. Still I see the same few verses being thrown around in support of one opinion or another. I wonder why those particular verses stick with certain people and other, just as worthy verses are ignored.Like this one......
by denden mangubat 7 years ago
Threatening folks is not an act of mercy, it is an act of hatred.
by jonnycomelately 7 years ago
When anyone, of whatever religious persuasion, holds thoroughly rigid views within the accepted norms of that religion, does it make for honesty and truth? Or deception and lies?Opening up one's mind to other points of view, does this help in the understanding of truth? Or does it cloud and...
by Elizabeth 6 years ago
How can the Bible be considered proofI would say that 8 out of ten times when discussing proof of god with a theist, they quote the Bible. In my perspective, the Bible is the collection of claims about the christian god, not the evidence for it - and all claims require...
by Melissa Barrett 10 years ago
Okay, I've really taken an interest in the forums for the last few days as I need something to keep my mind off of something. I've noticed a few things and came up with a few theories on HubPages groupthink. Thought it be fun to test them out, so here goes:I, technically, am a Unitarian...
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|