|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Do you think striking Syria will stop the use of chemical weapons altogether?
What is your opinion about this?
Bad people do bad things. unless you change the factors, so they cannot do the bad, what else can you expect. We hope that more of the Worlds nations and leaders will hold these people accountable rather than just the USA.
I doubt it. It might convince Assad to actually use them. If you're already being condemned for it, you have nothing to lose.
To say so is to imply that the Syrians did it so stop playing the media game and start thinking for yourself by using a more rational source of information.
To say so implies that you know what is the origin of those chemical weapons. If you know so please enlighten us!
Frankly there is no conclusive proof that Syria has used chemical weapons. It is more like used by the rebels to put the blame on Assad and invite US action.
The US wanting a ruse to attack Syria has latched on to this. Remember the talk of WMD in Iraq was a big lie. Why not the same thing in Syria ?
The only saving grace is Obama, who has held off the attack, but that is because he is an Afro American. A white president would have launched an attack weeks back.
It will be a disaster for America to fight another war with a trillion dollar deficit. Anybody thinking about it ?
by Missing Link4 years ago
Are we (the USA) really going to launch an unprovoked attack upon Syria? Really?Obama said a long time ago if the Syrian regime used chemical weapons in Syria it would cross a line. The last thing...
by Susie Lehto13 months ago
More than 50 tomahawk missiles were launched from US Navy destroyers, targeting an airfield near Homs, the report said, citing a US official.More to follow..* http://www.itv.com/news/2017-04-07/repo …...
by Deforest5 years ago
It just happened in Syria and guess who did it? The so-called Free Syria Army. Most of the victims were civilians! But what do we care? We are so far!Where do those chemical weapons come from if not from the West? Since...
by Deforest4 years ago
Given it was not proven that the Syrian government was involved in the Ghouta attack, why would they have to dismantle their chemical arsenal whereas few miles away a greater danger is shadowing the whole middle east...
by Thomas Byers3 years ago
What Do You Think About Chemical Weapons Used In Syria?In the name of religion various factions of the Muslim faith are fighting one another and now they have used chemical weapons. Why do these people keep doing this...
by My Esoteric4 years ago
Let's say Israel hadn't bombed the Syrian nuclear program into oblivion decades ago, or the world lets Iran develop nuclear capability and they ship some suitcase nukes to Assad, or North Korea sneaked some in. In...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.