jump to last post 1-5 of 5 discussions (5 posts)

Do you think striking Syria will stop the use of chemical weapons altogether?

  1. alexandriaruthk profile image71
    alexandriaruthkposted 4 years ago

    Do you think striking Syria will stop the use of chemical weapons altogether?

    What is your opinion about this?

  2. Oscarlites profile image38
    Oscarlitesposted 4 years ago

    Bad people do bad things. unless you change the factors, so they cannot do the bad, what else can you expect.   We hope that more of the Worlds nations and leaders will hold these people accountable rather than just the USA.

  3. Thomas Swan profile image97
    Thomas Swanposted 4 years ago

    I doubt it. It might convince Assad to actually use them. If you're already being condemned for it, you have nothing to lose.

  4. maxoxam41 profile image76
    maxoxam41posted 4 years ago

    To say so is to imply that the Syrians did it so stop playing the media game and start thinking for yourself by using a more rational source of information.
    To say so implies that you know what is the origin of those chemical weapons. If you know so please enlighten us!

  5. MG Singh profile image46
    MG Singhposted 4 years ago

    Frankly there is no conclusive proof that Syria has used chemical weapons. It is more like used by the rebels to put the blame on Assad and invite US action.
    The US wanting a ruse to attack Syria has latched on to this. Remember the talk of WMD in Iraq was a big lie. Why not the same thing in Syria ?
    The only saving grace is Obama, who has held off the attack, but that is because he is an Afro American. A white president would have launched an attack weeks back.
    It will be a disaster for America to fight another war with a trillion dollar deficit. Anybody thinking about it ?