jump to last post 1-4 of 4 discussions (14 posts)

Has anyone heard mention of this in any of the media?The picture is of Marc and

  1. tsadjatko profile image57
    tsadjatkoposted 4 years ago

    Has anyone heard mention of this in any of the media?The picture is of Marc and Chelsea Mezvinsky.

    Marc's father, Ed Mezvinsky, Chelsea Clinton's father-in law, a former (D) congressman embezzled over $10 million dollars from people via both a Ponzi and Nigerian e-mail scams. Friends & politically intertwined with the Clintons for many years he pleaded guilty to 31 of 69 counts of bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud & still owes $9.4 million in restitution.If this guy was Jenna or Barbara Bush's, or Sarah Palin's daughter's father-in- law, the news would be an everyday headline & every detail would be reported over & over. Yet  liberals claim no double standards in political reporting?

    https://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/8752894_f260.jpg

  2. profile image0
    Old Poolmanposted 4 years ago

    Very interesting but this is the first time I have heard of this.

    1. tsadjatko profile image57
      tsadjatkoposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      First time I ever heard of it too, & they got married in 2010 but you can bet if Sarah Palin's daughter had such a father in law you would know all about it, wouldn't you? http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/mezvinsky.asp Clinton's & he t

  3. junkseller profile image85
    junksellerposted 4 years ago

    Any of the media includes conservative news as well. No one is talking about it. Most likely because the father of the husband of the daughter of a former president isn't very interesting, but also because they have been married for several years. The only ones talking about the couple are gossipers interested in how much their wedding cost or the new house they purchased. To complain that the 'liberal media' isn't talking about something that NOBODY is talking about makes very little sense.

    1. tsadjatko profile image57
      tsadjatkoposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      As usual you miss, or more probably purposely avoid the real point which isn't that no one is talking about this but If this guy was a Republican daughter's father-in- law, the news would be an everyday headline, but that is what we expect from you.

    2. junkseller profile image85
      junksellerposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      And as usual you ask rhetorical questions with the point of essentially spitting on people. Why you accept being such a low creature is beyond me.

    3. tsadjatko profile image57
      tsadjatkoposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      YOU never fail to prove my point - liberals, like you just can't accept the truth and when you are shown your blatant double standards you revert to raising a straw man, changing the subject, name calling, anything except admit the facts, the truth.

    4. junkseller profile image85
      junksellerposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Tagg Romney is mixed up in a ponzi scheme. Don't see him on the news every single day (or any day).

    5. tsadjatko profile image57
      tsadjatkoposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Excuse me, is Romney runnng for an office? DUH! When he was the press couldn't connect him to corruption (like the Clintons are at every turn)so they reported on a hair cutting incident in his chilldhood, his dog, &accused him of killing someone

    6. junkseller profile image85
      junksellerposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Clinton isn't running for office either. Even when Romney was, Tagg wasn't a daily headline. The press had no reason to connect Romney to corruption. He was a terrible candidate on his face.

    7. tsadjatko profile image57
      tsadjatkoposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      As usual you ignore the facts with your babble. Like Clinton isn't running in 2016?The press is nowscreaming criticism of her is offlimits. http://www.mrctv.org/videos/fncs-kelly- … ntons-past

    8. junkseller profile image85
      junksellerposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Sure, let's prove media bias by citing conservative biased sources such as FOX News and the MRC. Makes perfect sense. I think I'll stick to objective and credible news sources. The ones that teach facts such as that Clinton has not announced running.

    9. tsadjatko profile image57
      tsadjatkoposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Again can't face facts so attack the messenger. Really? An objective person knows that clip was factual, the opposite of your spin but like I've said before, you always demonstrate the liberal mind at work quite well, you never fail to dissapoint.

  4. Jodah profile image91
    Jodahposted 4 years ago

    Haven't heard anything about it. But if he is Chelsea Clinton's father in law he is high profile enough to have made the news especially if he has embezzled that amount of money. Anyone who rips off others should be exposed, sounds like the biased media reporting by Rupert Murdock's News Limited press in Australia.

 
working