Should any executive departments or agencies be eliminated and why?
There are hundreds of executive departments and agencies in the federal government the responsibilities of which are not identified in the Constitution should they be eliminated and why?
Yes. Every agency that has no Constitutional responsibilities should be eliminated. I refer you to the Tenth Amendment:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
The Federal government was never intended to be as overreaching as it currently is. The people have allowed it to become so.
When the country was founded the entire population of the country was less than the current population of Chicago, and there were only a handful of cities with more than 5,000 people, which today is the size of a large high school.
Not to mention the astronomical differences in technology and interconnectedness, both between ourselves and other nations. There are plenty of places in the government to trim off some fat, but getting rid of things because they aren't in the Constitution is silly. Doing so completely ignores the will and purpose of the people that created those additions in the first place.
Our Constitution is pretty spartan. It is a framework, a foundation, not the beginning and end of everything. It was specifically intended to have some flexibility to adjust to changing conditions, and it has. Even were there a discrepancy between it and the current government, the solution is to change the Constitution, not scrap the government.
All not identified in the Constitution should be eliminated. Why? Because power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
After 1861, the federal government became far less a servant of the people and more its master.
by Brian7 years ago
I was on facebook earlier today, and a friend of mine posted a Youtube video about just how much money is being used to support the Bush tax cuts for the rich. 100 Billion dollars of the average tax payer's money! Which...
by LiamBean8 years ago
I'm not attempting to swat a hornet's nest here. I just keep hearing the refrain "no government is good government" or words to that effect.According to the tea-party folks I've spoken to government is...
by Brett Winn4 years ago
If you discover a drone hovering over your property, is it legal to shoot it down?
by Michael Collins5 years ago
Do we (Americans) have freedom of speech? If so should Joan Rivers’s apologies for what she said? Can we learn from this and other people who say what they think without considering the consequences while you have the...
by Jessie Watson8 days ago
Yesterday during the brief after the U.S. deployed missiles in Syria, General Mattis said something to the effect of "After reviewing Article II of the constitution, we are confident that the POTUS had legal...
by Clive Donegal5 years ago
When does intentionally discrediting the executive branch rise to the level of treason?When the U.S. president is constantly defending himself and his administration against unrelenting attacks by a political faction...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.