Is the public school system teaching kids that the government is the solution to problems?
My school-age years were not spent in the public school system, so I ask the above question. I generally believe that people are able solve all types of problems without the interference of government. But is the public education system teaching the opposite? Is the system reinforcing the idea that the gov. can solve all our problem through regulation? Please explain why you agree or disagree with my sentiments.
When I went to public school we spent very little time on government unless that was a specific course someone was taking. Even then government and economics classes was geared towards teaching how our system worked.
No instructor taught how government should work all the lessons and tests were based off of information provided in the books.
In my daily life I have very little government interference.
Like a lot of folks I work, pay my bills, spend time with family, travel, and put some money aside for the future.
Most regulations come about because people were abused or taken advantage of. Child labor laws for instance came about because children were being forced to work in horrible conditions. The FDA oversees inspection of drugs and food supplies...etc
Trust me without some of these "regulations" people would cut corners on everything from building codes, using lead in products, to dumping chemicals in drinking water.
Honesty and greed are strangers.
The purpose of the government is to pass and enforce laws.
As I noted earlier most laws and regulations don't come about until AFTER there has been criminal behavior. If people were naturally honest and not looking to take advantage of one another there would be fewer laws/regulations.
While government is not the (solution) for all our problems it sure is not the (cause) of all our problems.
"....government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth." - Abraham Lincoln (November 19, 1863 )
I think a lot has changed since you were in school. There's far more bureaucracy now. Far more gov. infringements. I get the feeling that many young people have no reservations about using the gov. to push agendas and force compliance on others.
I suppose it depends on one's view of "agenda". The Declaration of Independence says: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.." Some people view pushing for equality/ending discrimination as an agenda.
By "agenda" I generally mean those actions which take away the rights of people, in which case the equality issue would not fit this definition. It seems the younger generations are looking to the gov. to "right all wrongs" and that's a problem.
As my mother use to tell us: "Life is not fair!"
Unfortunately some people never accept that as a fact. Even if given an equal opportunity some people will always excel above and beyond others!
One has to develop (their gifts) to get ahead.
It doesn't seem like public schools teach much of anything, especially your topic.
BradmasterOCal, I think maybe you missed the point. "My topic" of course is not an actual class taught, but rather a philosophy permeating public school culture. Young people these days view the gov. as more of a savior, rather than the servant.
If there was any class that taught government was the solution, it was U.S. history. The wars we've won, the hardships we've endured, the inventions we've created. Granted, not all of that is government (a lot of it was capitalism) but if it could be found anywhere, it would be there. And it isn't by design. Telling a child that the government did something good in the past is just a fact, like telling them it did something bad. A child reviewing the history of this country would form their own conclusions about the usefulness of government.
Other than that, there is no underlying conspiracy to teach kids that government is good. Well, aside from the fact that they're getting a free K-12 education. If you value learning, then it could be seen as a positive government action.
Thanks, MT. I think the examples you gave (wars won, hardships endured, inventions) can be attributed to the people, not gov. I'm just noticing a trend of gov. reliance, rather than self and community reliance. The gov. was never meant to be nanny.
One could argue that 'community reliance' is government.
Not really, M.T. Government has the power to force your compliance, by taking your stuff or killing you, if need be. Given that, I wouldn't say relying on your neigbors (community) is the same at all.
What is government but a big community? Even the smallest neighborhoods have organizations and leaders. Government can be bloated and corrupt. But the wins, endurance, and inventions of the people wouldn't have been possible without that community.
by Rose West 8 years ago
I've been writing an article about the government's involvement in education... It seems to me that our kids would be a lot better off if the government had never gotten involved. But what if the Department of Education was stopped? What would education look like if public schools were closed?...
by Matthew Dawson 6 years ago
Can our current public school system survive much longer with the federal budget cuts?In the last year there has been more scandalous stories of teachers, school administrators, and local school politicians violating the civil rights of our children and there family. I believe this is happening out...
by Yuki92 7 years ago
In my opinion, public school is a gargantuan waste of time.To keep it brief, however, I'll just mention a small point. The method teachers teach us to remember is so faulty and unpractical. They tell us to repeat repeat repeat and study study study.However, after much research, this isn't how the...
by kashannkilson 7 years ago
Are public schools still important? Are charter schools and privatization the future? Does it even affect the country's role in the world economy?
by pitzele 7 years ago
Do you think that the public school system should be disbanded in favor of home learning?The schools are, in many places, dangerous and really not the best environment for learning. In many cases, they are free day-care with little educational value.
by thaivalentine 7 years ago
The average American teacher works 9 months a year, gets holidays off, receives a base salary, pension, full benefits and a job for life as a result of tenure. What you get, someone with a Masters Degree who on average teaches a class of students ranging from 30 to 50 students who span the...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|