Do you think people should be prosecuted for anti-Muslim speech?
Loretta Lynch wants to prosecute anyone who talks smack about Muslims. I am NOT saying that it is okay to do that, or that I would, because I don't do that, but the point I am trying to make is that--1. Is this not a violation of the 1st amendment? 2. What about other groups, like Christians, Jews, and even gays, other races, etc--where does it stop, and should it stop? and 3. As long as nobody is planning to physically hurt anyone, should it be punished with such severity? Are people becoming too thin-skinned?
Speaking to the audience at the Muslim Advocates' 10th anniversary dinner Thursday, Lynch said her "greatest fear" is the "incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric" in America and vowed to prosecute any guilty of what she deemed violence-inspiring speech. She chose this place and time to say such a thing solely to pander to Muslims hoping to court their votes for the Democrat party.
Now you know that, like her predecessor Eric Holder, Lynch is far more concerned with promoting the social justice agenda than protecting the Constitutional rights of American citizens. What exactly is speech that "edges toward violence"? What exactly are "actions predicated on violent talk"?
In the end, it is whatever she decides it to mean. Once again we see the agenda of the Obama administration covertly being instituted though a government department that is supposed to be apolitical.
If she is serious then why doesn't she start with the militant gays who threatened the lives of the owners of the cake baking co. who refused to cater a gay wedding? I guess she couldn't find the meeting of Cake baker Advocates' 10th anniversary dinner to address their audience?!
Or what about Black Live Matter chanting "What do we want? Dead police! When do we want them? Now!" or "Pigs in a blanket, fry like bacon." Thank you for your answer. You made some good points.
T~who's the dude in the blue jacket & earrings?Is that Loretta B-4 laser hair removal? I don't see a rise in anti-muslim rhetoric , but if I did it wouldn't be incredibly disturbing. What IS disturbing is that THIS is our AG's greatest fear.
That's just a pic of Lorreta Lynch taken with a new technology camera which shows the real personage behind her motivations, in this case Eric Holder. Don't you just love technology! It's called the DCRC (digital channeling revealed) camera.
You just made that up. But, it's pretty clever anyway. LOL
Well the liberals here just make things up&expect people to believe their fantasies,why can't I?Oh i know the answer,that's like when they point to other's bad behavior to justify their own bad behavior, maybe someone can point that out to them.
It is not "freedom of speech" to incite violence and to encourage discrimination against any particular race or religion. Anyone engaging in such activity should be prosecuted.
I agree! - Regardless of who it is directed at, or spoken by, if one is inciting violence and discrimination against any particular race/religion/orientation - should be prosecuted.
SO then you think Loretta Lynch is discriminating by only calling for prosecution of those spewing anti-Muslim rhetoric (her "GREATEST fear"), & not saying same about inciting violence against other religions or beliefs. Bravo, good point!
So, let me get this correct. You claim Muslims who not only INCITE violence (Death to America!) against Christians & all Non-Muslims, but attack, torture & murder, should be prosecuted. I agree. They must be locked up for LIFE.
Who is first in line to be prosecuted? Trump?
With free speech many times I just apply Newton's third law - "For every action, there is an 'equal' and opposite reaction".
All censorship is wrong.
There are already existing laws which would prosecute anyone inciting violence, and those incited to commit it, no other law is required.
If people get insulted by free speech, they should move to a country where it does not exist.
People should not be prosecuted for *ANY* speech. After all, freedom of speech means the freedom to speak your mind, whatever it is. If you don't believe in freedom, then please go ahead and start limiting what we can say and what we can't. While you're at it, please light the Constitution on fire. People have become way too thin-skinned.
Not a very good idea. In such a "free" society , anyone could yell "fire" in a crowded theatre with impunity. You could tell a retarded person to jump out of a window and let the Easter Bunny (waiting 10 stories below) catch them, etc.
It is a very good idea. Many, many people would be in jail if they were prosecute for free speech. People shouldn't be control, thought controlled, or afraid to say anything and have to keep emotions bottled up.
What does "anti-Muslim" speech entail? Is it criticism about Islam as a religion? Sure, that's perfectly legal, just as it's legal to criticize Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, etc. Is insulting people legal? Depends on the time and place (can count as verbal abuse and harassment) but generally, while it's cruel, it's not something the US prosecutes.
Is saying "Death to Muslims" or otherwise encouraging violence or other severe harassment legal? NO. And THAT'S what Muslims in America fear, that people will want to "take revenge" on them, even though they are innocent, after terrorist attacks from Islamic terrorist extremists. Considering these kinds of crimes actually do happen, Muslims have the right to be afraid of violent rhetoric.
But the point is, it's not about Muslims, or any other group - the same standards apply to ANY group or individual. Violent and hate speech is NOT protected by the first amendment (freedom of speech doesn't actually mean you're allowed to say anything, that's why threatening to hurt/kill someone or bomb threats and such are still illegal). Considering the large amount of anti-Muslim attacks (on people, and mosques) in the US, it's an issue worth talking about specifically, but the legalities are no different when applied to Christians, or atheists, etc.
Again, criticizing religion is and will always be 100% legal. By all means, tear apart Islam, Christianity, etc. Just don't threaten people or property (or severely harass anyone).
Let's turn it around. Should anyone be prosecuted for anti-Christian speech? If the answer is no for one faith, the answer should be no for ALL faiths.
by Emer Kelly 5 years ago
Do you think people should have to display an understanding of politics before being allowed to voteI don't mean an in-depth understanding, just a basic one of how government works and what each party/candidate stands for.
by John Marshall 3 years ago
Do you think people should go to church on Easter Sunday?If so, should people go to church year round? Why?If not, is there ever a time when people should go to church? Explain.
by Sarah Jason 17 months ago
Why do you think people are so quick to defend Bible verses, but to openly criticize Qur'an verses?I am currently in the process of achieving my M.A in Religious studies that will continue into a Ph.D program. My concentration is Christian-Muslim relations, and how I believe there are more...
by Wissam Qawasmeh 7 months ago
What comes in your mind when you hear the word Islam or Muslim?And Why?
by Thomas Byers 5 years ago
Do You Think People Should Be Permitted To Sell A Kidney?Should the US Government and other countries change their position and allow people to sell a kidney if they wished to? And why please.
by Eddie Carrara 6 years ago
Do you think people should work on improving their weaknesses or perfect their strengths?As children, we are always taught to improve our weaknesses. As an adult I find it's more beneficial to work my strengths and stop wasting time on things I'm not good at, what do you think?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|