|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Why do we still primarily have a two party political system?
I would think people who really want change would eventually stop voting in the same types of people. Yet over and over they keep voting for the same 2 parties. 3rd party candidates are not given media attention, don't get included with the debates (usually), and seem ignored by the country. This makes no sense if everyone really is tired of the usual. So why no shift yet?
It would help if candidates would have the courage to stand on principle and stop using the establishment because there's more chance of them getting elected. I think Sanders should have created the Democratic Socialist Party, and Trump should have just run as Fascist.
The US electoral college system was designed to encourage the formation of two large parties that build large coalitions, instead of small regional and special interest parties that keep the parliamentary systems in constant flux.
Quilligrapherposted 3 years ago posted: Brits manage to accomplish in four weeks what takes a year of more to complete in America. Let’s not even talk about the difference in costs! A run off election is no big deal to them.
There is a lot about British electioneering to admire. It is swift and not overly burdened by raising money. Furthermore, spouses are not elevated to celebrity status and they manage to maintain their own individual lives outside the political arena. More importantly, the British electorate is well informed, engaged in the process, and civilized when dealing with differences of opinion. Even the candidates appear to be more natural and accessible.
On this side of the puddle, elections are a pathetic circus, painfully long, and disgracefully expensive. The public is bombarded with sound-bytes and TV attack ads. Campaigns are numbing spectacles dominated by high paid talking heads bent on creating a freak show just to boost ratings. - http://hubpages.com/politics/forum/1051 … al-college
Basically because of generations of Loyal Party Voters. Many of them were born into there political party of preference. It was their parent's preference and they adopted it.
They probably heard the saying from their parents, "The democrats are for the poor, and the republicans are for the rich".
What they weren't told and haven't figured out for themselves, is neither party cares about the middle class. That class was the one that made America special and now that it is dwindling into the poor class, so is the might and the pride of the US.
The loyal party voter is the problem, and they survive from generation to generation because of the family. The family initiates their indoctrination into politics and religion.
It is only the few that use their intelligence to make their own choice.
Possibly the reason we have a two-party political system is that it's easier for voters to choose between two people (representing the platforms from their parties) in a general election rather than three or four.
Often, a candidate represents their political party's platform. Usually that platform consists of several topics. Historically, third party candidates are one-issue candidates. Their party may focus on the environment (Green) or other agendas.
Also,third party candidates in a presidential election usually exist to shed light on an issue that may be ignored by the big two or is the result of a candidate from one of the major parties who felt they could win in a general election rather than in a primary.
Third parties do win, but they're in congressional/senatorial elections (such as Bernie Sanders or Leiberman).
Another thing to consider about the two-party system is that it's stable. Even if the candidates may not be appealing, they are often closer to the center of the political spectrum. In multiple party systems around the world (sometimes where more than 20 candidates are running for office), the candidates tend to be all over the political system. This can create chaos before, during and after elections.
by MNichopolis5 years ago
Is the two party political system in the United States still viable, or is it too corrupted?
by alexandriaruthk5 years ago
Can there be bipartisanship in a two party political system?Is it possible to achieve this - the word compromise for the greater good or is it a futile effort?
by Mark Lees4 years ago
Do you feel current party political systems are truly democratic?Party political systems are dominant in nearly all western democracies but does the limit of choosing from a small selection of parties represent true...
by alexandriaruthk5 years ago
Is a two party political system - Republican and Democratic working in the US?The Democratic and Republican are the two known dominant parties in the US and every citizen who is going to vote will either choose either...
by triosol7 years ago
Would India be better off with a two- or three-party political system?
by William Johnson3 years ago
Do you think we need more than two major political parties in the USA?Do you think the country would be better with more parties represented on a bigger scale?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.