What SHOULD be done to eradicate ISIS terrorists worldwide? Do you contend that

1. 85

   gmwilliamsposted 8 years ago

   What SHOULD be done to eradicate ISIS terrorists worldwide?  Do you contend that President
   
   Obama is complicit regarding these ISIS attacks worldwide? Why? Why not?
   
   

   replyreport
2. 63

   wingedcentaurposted 8 years ago

   Wait! Are there ISIS "terrorists" operating worldwide? My understanding is that ISIS stands for: Islamic State of Iraq and Syria; and that they hold a large swath of contiguous territory in both countries; and this is, specifically, how they differ from Al Quaeda.
   
   Do you mean Islamic terrorism in general?
   
   First of all, you cannot wipe out a tactic: terrorism. Even if you could "eradicate" all people currently practicing terrorism---the frustrating thing seems to be the fact that the fallen are endlessly replaced.
   
   But I think that a just solution to the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian crisis would go a long way toward taking the oxygen out of the inferno of Arab-Muslim indignation.

   replyreport
3. 82

   tamarawilhiteposted 8 years ago

   We are fighting an evil ideology, one that says it is OK for its members to rape non-members, have sex slaves, kill those who won't convert.
   We cannot win World War 3 against fundamentalist Islam without admitting it IS Islam.
   
   The current problem is the constant harping "Islam is a religion of peace" after every Muslim terrorist attack, thousands a year.
   
   Or the narrative is it is a lone wolf, just a weirdo, ignoring the ideology and religious leaders who say yes, kill people, Allah wants it.
   Hate imam preached executing gays at Orlando mosque before massacre
   http://nypost.com/2016/06/14/hate-imam- … -massacre/
   
   One in four Muslims in the West, according to Pew polls, admits to supporting terrorist bombings. Half say yes, we want to impose Shariah law, which privileges Islam over all others, institutes a death penalty for apostasy, homosexuality, atheism. Ask about those particular tenets, and most Muslims in the West say outlaw those things. That is a belief system incompatible with liberal secular democracy.
   
   This is not a fringe interpretation of Islam. It is the heart of Islam, 2/3 of the holy book of the faith. Mohamed is held up as the perfect man, and he led war parties to kill all the men in tribes that refused to convert to Islam, taking the women and children as slaves. That is not a peaceful religion.
   
   Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"
   A command to strike terror with horrors to scare them into convert
   There are more than a hundred verses like this in the Koran.
   
   The highest good in Islam is spreading Islam, not life. Thus killing one person to scare ten into converting them to Islam is MORAL in that faith.
   
   But political correctness says ignore the violent verses and actions by Muslims per the Koran, enabling outright evil.
   Why Did British Police Ignore Pakistani Gangs Abusing 1,400 Rotherham Children? Political Correctness
   http://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerscruto … 77812f5a7c
   
   26 women are sexually assaulted at German concert, groped in copycat attacks like those in Cologne
   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … tims-surro

   replyreport