jump to last post 1-3 of 3 discussions (4 posts)

How much more support with Clinton lose when voters never see her "pneumonia" cl

  1. RJ Schwartz profile image94
    RJ Schwartzposted 18 months ago

    How much more support with Clinton lose when voters never see her "pneumonia" clear up?

    Clinton has had a nasty, show-stopping, raspy, barking cough for a long time. Her sense of balance has also been compromised for a long time.  Yet, her team and the willing lapdog media is now pushing the fake pneumonia story in hopes it serves as a blanket excuse for everything.  The problem is that it won't get better and she'll keep having these horrible symptoms all of her life unless she gets serious about her medical treatment.  Her voters (a rapidly dwindling number) will certainly feel lied to as usual, but will it keep them from supporting her?


  2. LindaSmith1 profile image60
    LindaSmith1posted 18 months ago

    This constant coughing is also a sign of Parkinson's, as is her falling, etc.  I guess many have forgotten the cover up for Reagan who became  president when he was in early stages of Alzheimer's which was also covered up for a long time.

    1. bradmasterOCcal profile image28
      bradmasterOCcalposted 18 months agoin reply to this

      The difference is the character and history of the two. Did covering up Reagan do any harm to the country or the people, and will that be true if Clinton becomes president?

  3. tamarawilhite profile image92
    tamarawilhiteposted 18 months ago

    I think the terrorist attacks today just one week after she passed out at the 9-11-01 15th anniversary (St. Cloud attacker shouting Allahu ackbar, NYC bomb that injured over a dozen, bomb by veteran's charity race that didn't hurt anyone) will have far greater impact.