Is the newest "intelligence" report just doubling down theatrics to try to prove

Jump to Last Post 1-3 of 3 discussions (6 posts)
  1. RJ Schwartz profile image93
    RJ Schwartzposted 19 months ago

    Is the newest "intelligence" report just doubling down theatrics to try to prove Trump wrong?

    And yet another Intelligence report is released today - nothing new except the changed terminology which now says for CERTAIN the Russian President directed the hacking activities - yet they admit no actual votes were changed, only influencing activities.  No mention of George Soros and the Open Borders Society is mentioned.  By omitting the largest influencer on the planet, the report is obviously a political stunt.  Thoughts?

    https://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13351055_f260.jpg

  2. The Old Guard profile image71
    The Old Guardposted 19 months ago

    https://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13351095_f260.jpg

    Yup, hillary killary was exposed as a corrupt politician - fact
    DNC was partisan to hillary killary as was the mass media - fact
    Did Russia hack into hillary killary's email - doubtful.
    If she was afraid Russia would expose her corruption, why did she not let the FBI investigate? Maybe she was afraid they'd see all the links to her corruption - more believable.
    Why did the DNC now allow the FBI to investigate any hacking? Were they too afraid of exposure for their corruption and rigging of the primaries? more believable.
    What did Russia have to gain? They'd already dealt with hillary killary in her pay to play scheme for uranium - they knew she could be bought off - believable.
    What advantage is there to Trump in the White House - he doesn't need money - bribes won't work. He's got nothing to gain from dealing with the Russians other than to create a more peaceful world.
    The CIA, the FBI the NHS and all the other agencies, if they create a "monster" in Russia, they get more funding to fight them - much more believable than Russia getting anything from Trump.
    So, my conclusion, is the "information" - which is lacking of proof - and "judgements" are the same type of information we were fed leading up to the Iraq war - it's in the interest of the "state" to have chaos and wars, hence they can continue taking away the freedoms of Americans.
    So, I think just propaganda on the U.S. Governments part, with no solid evidence of any rigging.
    Solid evidence of a corrupt candidate? Yes
    Solid evidence of a biased leadership in the DNC? Yes
    Collusion with the left wing mass media to support a leftist type candidate? Yes
    Actual proof of hacking and rigging concerning Russia? None yet.
    I believe in "judgement' from the U.S. government as much as I believe in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy. The U.S. government has lied so much in my 64 years in the country, I wouldn't trust them with walking my dog. I figure they'd eat it for a meal or sell it.
    That's the U.S. politicians view of serving in office - stealing, racketeering and lies from the time they get into office until the time the citizens are sick and tired of their BS.
    All you have to do is look at obamama's tenure and legacy. A disgusting president if there ever was one.
    He's allowed theft, selling of guns to drug cartels, killed 1.000's of innocents around the world, created a mass tax increase that has forced millions to suffer and he thinks he's done great.
    Go figure that one out!

    1. Dont Taze Me Bro profile image60
      Dont Taze Me Broposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      Well said John...I might add he Obama administration new all & anything the CIA or any other agency had to say about Russian hacking long before the election,a year or more,but said absolutely nothing about it,did nothing about it.WHY?

    2. RJ Schwartz profile image93
      RJ Schwartzposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      Very well stated John - the after-the-fact "urgency" really reeks of partisanship - we need a house cleaning in the intel sectors

  3. tamarawilhite profile image92
    tamarawilhiteposted 19 months ago

    Yes. They couldn't stop Trump, so now they are trying to delegitimize it.
    Funny how they blamed sexism, fake news and Huma Abedin before they blamed the Russians.

    From before the election, by CNN
    No, the presidential election can't be hacked
    http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/19/politics/ … explained/

    1. Dont Taze Me Bro profile image60
      Dont Taze Me Broposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      If Russia affected the outcome of the election then leaks by the CIA affected the outcome in her favor or she wouldn't have said over &over 17 agencies say Putin interfered with the election so Russia helped HRC or why not sanction the CIA?

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)