Is the fact the Russian's are exposing the Democrat's corruption the real fear o

1. 61

   The Old Guardposted 6 years ago

   Is the fact the Russian's are exposing the Democrat's corruption the real fear of Obama and Clinton?
   
   It's funny, if you think about it.
   The DNC Chair stealing debate questions and giving them to hillary killary before the debate.
   The DNC smearing Sanders and lauding hillary killary when they're supposed to be listening to the people who make up the party.
   hillary killary lying to the FBI about her emails.
   All the donations from foreign countries to the clinton Foundation and the favors that were granted by hillary killary.
   So, the words of Trump out shine the corruption within the democrat party.
   What do you make of this nonsense?
   
   

   replyreport
2. 89

   lisavollrathposted 6 years ago

   Seriously? A foreign government has broken laws to influence our election, and you're still harping about Hillary?
   
   WAKE UP!
   
   This is no longer a partisan issue. This is an American issue. The Russians specifically targeted one party, in order to ensure the other party was voted into power. How are you not angry as hell about this?
   
   And before you do your usual superior dance about how corrupt Hillary and the Democrats are, think. The Russians didn't release anything on the Republicans, or on Donald Trump. Do you really think it's because there's nothing to see? Do you really think they'd fare as well under that kind of massive hack?
   
   The time for your Hillary schtick is over. Stop and think about what's happening to your country. Your new President's administration will now never be considered legitimate by the majority of the country. Our election process will now always come under question. How are you still talking about Hillary?

   replyreport
   1. 61

      The Old Guardposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Since the government agency that is head of the intelligence community does not agree, nor does the FBI, you're telling me to believe the CIA?
      The ones who sold guns to the drug cartels?
      The ones who lied about the WMD's in Iraq?
      That CIA? HAHAHA

      replyreport
   2. 89

      lisavollrathposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      There are 17 intelligence agencies involved in the investigation. The CIA and the NSA are saying Russians hacked the DNC and various Dem orgs, to influence the election. A full report won't be issued until all agency investigations are completed.

      replyreport
   3. 61

      The Old Guardposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      And the FBI and the head of the Intelligence board does NOT believe them because they have shown no proof.
      These are CIA operatives who lie for a living, place false news stories at CNN, NY Times.
      Don't let facts hurt your profound bigotry.

      replyreport
   4. 89

      lisavollrathposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      From today's news: FBI no longer denies Russian involvement, just disputes the reason they did it. Director of National Intelligence says "only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities."

      replyreport
   5. 61

      The Old Guardposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      So Lisa, you're telling me that Russia exposed the corruption in the DNC and hillary killary's campaign? Is that what you're saying?
      That's the charge against Russia - exposing the corruption, the bribes, the robbery of debate questions by the DNC?

      replyreport
   6. 89

      lisavollrathposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Russia released documents about Hillary, but protected those they gathered from the hack of the RNC. Do you really think what they found there is not equally damning? This was a targeted attack against one candidate, for the benefit of the other.

      replyreport
   7. 61

      The Old Guardposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Lisa,
      So the mass media collusion, openly biased for hillary killary trying to sway the votes for her and against trump is good?
      But, Russia doing the same thing but against hillary killary and for Trump is bad?
      And klinton lying to the FBI is OK?

      replyreport
   8. 89

      lisavollrathposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Let me put this in small words, so you'll understand:
      
      Russia hacking the US: NOT OK.
      Russia deciding our next President: NOT OK.
      Russian puppet as our next President: NOT OK.
      Comparing Russia to Hillary: NOT OK.

      replyreport
   9. 63

      claptonaposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Lisa,
      So, you're saying Russia, which has not been proven as of yet, had more to do with the swaying of American people than CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, Facebook, Google, etc. etc.
      You think Russia's next move is to invade the U.S.?
      LOL

      replyreport
   10. 61

       The Old Guardposted 6 years agoin reply to this

       Lisa,
       So, the bias of the American mass media, supported by the White House to propagandize Trump as evil, is OK?
       And as Putin said this morning, "Show the proof or shut up."
       You object when the U.S. sways foreign elections? Like Ukraine, Egypt?

       replyreport
   11. 89

       lisavollrathposted 6 years agoin reply to this

       Thanks SO much for mansplaining my words. What would I do without you guys? I especially like the "well, they did it first" routine you have going. Brilliant! It's the same argument four year olds use when they're not getting their way.

       replyreport
   12. 61

       The Old Guardposted 6 years agoin reply to this

       Lisa,
       You're saying 61 million were swayed by Russia to vote for Trump?
       And that it's OK for the U.S. to meddle in other countries elections but now for anyone to mess in the U.S. elections.
       And the propaganda by the mass media for hillary was OK?

       replyreport
   13. 69

       norlawrenceposted 6 years agoin reply to this

       This whole mess has a problem.  Hillary was favored to win by a landslide so if the Russians were trying to swing the election in Trumps favor why did they allow him to win by 74 electoral votes?  That was a red flag.

       replyreport
   14. 89

       lisavollrathposted 6 years agoin reply to this

       "So you're saying..."
       
       I write in perfect English. You can read exactly what I'm saying. Why do you keep asking me what I'm saying, when it's written right in front of you.
       
       Maybe because it doesn't fit into your white nationalist narrative?

       replyreport
   15. 61

       The Old Guardposted 6 years agoin reply to this

       Lisa,
       I don't understand your logic. Wikileaks proved that the demoncraps tried to rig the elections. The latest recount in Michigan showed rigging by the demoncraps. I don't understand why you think exposing the corruption was a bad thing.

       replyreport
   16. 89

       lisavollrathposted 6 years agoin reply to this

       And I don't understand why you think Russia hacking our election is a good thing, or why you keep pointing at the Democrats. Using that logic, anyone hacking our systems, or influencing an election is a hero, as long as they swing it towards your guy

       replyreport
   17. 61

       The Old Guardposted 6 years agoin reply to this

       Lisa,
       The reason I keep bringing up the demoncraps is because they're the ones in the U.S. that tried to rig the election.
       If the Russians did hack into the demoncraps, why are you opposed to blaming demoncraps for their loss?
       Why blame Russia?

       replyreport
3. 48

   bradmasterOCcalposted 6 years ago

   
   
   John
   
   There are NO FACTS that even involve Russia.
   This is Defamation, and only Truth is a defense. Where is the truth?

   replyreport