Should SNAP recipients be subjected to a work requirement, if recipients are able-bodied?
The President has proposed a work requirement for Food Stamps and requiring proof that anyone collecting the Earned Income Credit is eligible to work in the United States. Many states, including ones that are very Liberal have already enacted similar requirements over the years with positive effects. The target group is able bodied persons without dependents - the President is not going after single moms or people with children or other dependents.
This is one of those questions that is not easily answered. The situations for those on Snap vary widely.
For instance, a single mom with two children can't afford to pay childcare, transportation, and the other related expenses to accept a minimum wage job. They are pretty much trapped unless they have been able to receive some skills training that raises them above minimum wage jobs.
Then we have those whom sit on their butts and watch TV all day, many because they can't pass a drug test to get a job. They should be required to work at some job.
The biggest problem is the way our welfare system is now structured. It is either all or nothing. If there were a phase-out method where those who need assistance could take a trainee type job without losing all of their benefits it would help. Some who know how to work the system can make more on welfare than they ever could being unskilled labor.
There is already a similar program in place in TX. There are probably exceptions, but people who receive SNAP here must also be registered with the Work Force and actively look for work. If contacted about a job match, a person must apply for it. I believe there are also occasional classes or some other kinds of meetings until said participant has a job. Of course, this only applies to applicants who are not already working.
But to answer the question, I don't think OT is a bad idea. Like anything else in a program like this, though, there should be allowances for special situations and the elderly or disabled should be taken into account since they are limited by what they can do.
If the person is able-bodied, of working age, won't have to pay all his/her wages in child care, and if jobs are available, yes. But there are certain areas where there are not enough jobs to go around, and city dwellers can't raise their own perpetual food source. These people should not have to die of hunger through no fault of their own while we pay all kinds of subsidies to illegal aliens because of "refugee" status. Should these able-bodied people be subjected to drug tests in this case, most definitely. The good ones shouldn't mind a little inconvenience to weed out the druggies who want to live off taxpayers.
by taburkett 5 years ago
President Obama has delayed Big Business requirement in Obamacare - does this make the law bad?Is this proof that Obamacare is bad for the nation? From the outset, many people have stated that Obamacare will actually ruin the healthcare and insurance communities in the USA. Now this action has been...
by Evan G Rogers 7 years ago
Ron Paul just came in 2nd place in the Iowa Ames Straw Poll. He was 152 votes behind Bachmann, despite it being her home state. The third place winner was Pawlenty with about half as many votes as either Paul or Bachmann.So, now the question is "how will the media ignore him now?". The...
by Two Minute Review 20 months ago
Is military service no longer a requirement for President/Vice President of the United States?I remember when Dan Quayle was looked on with derision because he "only" served in the National Guard. Yet 2012 could mark the first US election where no one on the ticket for either major party...
by My Esoteric 6 months ago
Here is the set of facts that apply to the question:* Most of those receiving assistance who can work, do work* Unemployment is at historic lows meaning very few jobs available* Most jobs today that are open require more than a high school degree with many needing a college diploma* By and large,...
by Merle Mulford 5 years ago
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|