Proving a negative - can it be done?
“There is absolutely no collusion. That has been proven,” - Trump . Yes a negative can be proven - by lack of evidence after due diligence exoneration. Do you agree?
You need to explain this with examples. Otherwise the answer is no because lack of evidence is also repudiation of any assertions.
Lack of evidence in a criminal case would allow the defendant to get a summary judgement in their favor. Lack of evidence would also exclude even moving forward to an arrest.
Without an arrest you can't go to trial, and without a trial or confession you can't get a verdict.
The FBI WARNED Trump in 2016 that the Russians would try to infiltrate his campaign. General Incompetence.
by SpanStar 5 years ago
Robert Zimmerman brother of George Zimmerman has stirred the issue of racism.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/2 … 79949.htmlClearly listening to Robert Zimmerman he appears to be a educated young man and one can understand a sibling being protective of a family member yet and still...
by sannyasinman 5 years ago
Now a proven paedophile, UK celebrity and close friend of Prince Charles, Jimmy Savile was also a supplier of children to be abused by the rich, royal and powerful eilte of the UK. http://21stcenturywire.com/2012/10/15/j … e-cesspit/He said of himself that he was untouchable, and could...
by paarsurrey 7 years ago
I am very thankful to our friend ediggity to write the following post in a thread elsewhere here. The point he has mentioned needs to be discussed in detail, so I start the thread.ediggity wrote:“Yes, my religion has faith. That is a main focus of my religion. I deal with reality...
by cooldad 6 years ago
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/09/scien … wanted=allNew fossils were found in South Africa which may help further explain human evolution. The fossils apparently show combinations of apelike and human combinations.Any thoughts?
by Grace Marguerite Williams 4 years ago
It is totally implausible in this postmodern, 21st century society that some people still have some contention regarding evolution. They contend that evolution is incongruent to religion and the bible. They further maintain that there is no such thing as evolution and that evolution is...
by John Sarkis 2 years ago
Would you still believe in God, if science hadn't proven creation without divine intervention?Up until the time of David Hume and Arthur Schopenhauer, people believed in a Creator, because origins of life couldn't be proven through science i.e., without a supernatural force being responsible for...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|