jump to last post 1-3 of 3 discussions (4 posts)

Proving a negative - can it be done?

  1. ptosis profile image80
    ptosisposted 2 months ago

    Proving a negative - can it be done?

    “There is absolutely no collusion. That has been proven,” -  Trump      . Yes a negative can be proven - by lack of evidence after due diligence exoneration. Do you agree?

    https://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13826759_f260.jpg

  2. bradmasterOCcal profile image32
    bradmasterOCcalposted 2 months ago

    https://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/12041459_f260.jpg

    Ptosis

    You need to explain this with examples. Otherwise the answer is no because lack of evidence is also repudiation of any assertions.

    Lack of evidence in a criminal case would allow the defendant to get a summary judgement in their favor. Lack of evidence would also exclude even moving forward to an arrest.

    Without an arrest you can't go to trial, and without a trial or confession you can't get a verdict.

    1. ptosis profile image80
      ptosisposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      'Lack of evidence ' is the key phrase - is there lack of evidence?

  3. ptosis profile image80
    ptosisposted 2 months ago

    The FBI WARNED Trump in 2016 that the Russians would try to infiltrate his campaign.  General Incompetence.

 
working