Why should the Mueller investigations continue?
This investigation started with a democrat paid opposition paper to smear candidate Trump. The 17 US Intelligence agencies didn't investigate it for facts, and veracity. Yet, the FBI used it to get the FISA court to allow spying on the Trump campaign.
Isn't that influencing the Election. And we don't have to look any farther than the DNC and Obama executive office to see election influencing.
For one, we're all pretty certain that the Benghazi hearings were there as a political smear job on Clinton, somewhat deservedly with that video claim, and yet, you didn't see Obama shutting them down.
Second, we've already had indictments handed down so there are guilty parties. If Mueller is helping to rid of government of corrupt politicians, isn't that a good thing?
Third, regardless of who started it, for Trump to fire the FBI Director because of it is a clear case of Obstruction of Justice, which is illegal. So in essence, you're saying that Trump does not need to be held accountable to the law. It should have been Rosenstein that made the decision to shut the investigation down, not Trump firing Comey to try and achieve that goal. And you're going down the same path if he tries to remove Mueller before he completes his investigation, and with 63% (AP poll) of the people believing that he did obstruct, this investigation needs to run its full course.
I vote yours as the best answer! Too bad Brad is going to delete it. He stays in the Q&A to have control over the conversation, something he can't do in the forums.
I second that. Thumbs up before it gets deleted.
It's quite obvious you're a Russian Troll who's sole purpose is to create agitprop. Previously you condemned Obama for not doing enough to prevent Russian election interference, now you condemn Obama for election interference? You just want to create tension and spread disagreement all for the sake of encouraging people to turn on themselves.
How much are you getting paid for all sustained dezinformatsiya?
Are you going to delete my answer ... AGAIN?
You are too obvious to be credible,
Valeant your response further enforces my belief that liberals cannot comprehend facts, truth and reality. "the Benghazi hearings were there as a political smear job on Clinton" I find the ignorance of this statement overwhelming. I suggest you read a copy of the Benghazi report. https://benghazi.house.gov/NewInfo
It is a fact that Hillary Clinton and FORMER president Barrack Obama intentionally misled the American public. They blamed the murder of a US ambassador on a YouTube video knowing that was a lie. They repeated this to the UN and others. If it were not for the significant corruption of the US Justice Department and the FBI under Obama, they would have been prosecuted.
"Trump to fire the FBI Director because of it is a clear case of Obstruction of Justice"
Do you really believe this? Where did you come up with this one? Under the law, the Special prosecutor serves at the discretion of the president. Trump is well within his legal authority as president to fire Mueller at anytime. He won't. If Mueller had found any evidence of collusion, he would have reported it to congress. He found nothing. As this investigation drags on and he provides nothing, the entire investigation looks like a true witch hunt and Trump looks good. FACT...NO indictments for collusion were brought against anyone from Trump's team. "COLLUSION" is the key word.
What is the crime for politicizing Benghazi with a fabricated video story, which I noted in my post, which you seem to have ignored.
Second, Mueller is not a special prosecutor. He's a special counsel, only AG can remove, under the law. Fact check
You failed to answer the question, what is the crime? If being untruthful is the crime, Trump would get life.
"Liberals cannot comprehend facts, truth and reality" Again, you've proven my point. The key word here being "comprehend."
No comprehension needed when you clearly don't understand that Trump cannot fire Mueller. Rosenstein has to be the one to do it. This according to the law. Your facts aren't even facts.
Q:Can President Donald Trump fire special counsel Robert Mueller?
A:Not directly. He could fire the DAG, or order the special-counsel regulations repealed and fire Mueller himself.
liberals only understand the "History of Now " , AS they dig desperately for Trump dirt , little do they realize that this is opening an entire web of party deceit from the left . Clinton , Obama ," The Dossier" , The DNC fiasco , there is so much dirt in the eye's on the left that they are blind to the Mueller possibilities , let him go on and on , if it's determined he's dirty Trump can fire his a$$, if Clinton comes into it , watch out for all the new stuff .
by Sychophantastic 22 months ago
You remember Benghazi, right?Four brave Americans died in an attack that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was responsible for. Prior to the election, investigations were closing in on hard evidence that was going to put Hillary Clinton in jail. Now, after the election, not a peep about where...
by Randy Godwin 17 months ago
With Trump being officially investigated for Obstruction of Justice, will he survive the ordeal?Today the Washington Post revealed--through 5 separate sources--Bob Mueller is officially investigating Trump for Obstruction of Justice. The last two Senate interviews with Trumps's cabinet members had...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 2 years ago
What are your thoughts on Hillary being cleared of all responsibility by the Republicaninvestigative committee according to the 800 report regarding Benghazi?
by Jack Lee 2 months ago
In light of recent events, here is my advice for President Trump moving forward.1. Focus like a laser beam on the economy.2. Start building the wall.3. Reframe from tweets and attacking the media.4. Act Presidential in all foreign affairs.5. Speak directly to the American people like Reagan did and...
by Randy Godwin 4 hours ago
For many of us on the left, DT's putting a known anti-Mueller person in the AG's position is simply an attempt to quash the investigation into himself. Legal scholars are already saying the act is unconstitutional at best, and may be illegal at worst. Not to mention Whitaker's being involved in an...
by Susie Lehto 12 months ago
Judge Andrew Napolitano said, “The significance is an FBI acknowledgement that Huma Abedin, Mrs. Anthony Weiner, when she had a top security clearance as the number two assistant to Hillary Clinton when Hillary was Secretary of State, regularly sent copies of sensitive material to her own laptop...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|