I’m curious to know what the ‘breaking point’ was for people who have switched Parties in their lifetime -from either side. I’ve always been on one side, but I read about people who’ve said they ‘seen the
Iight’ and switched (no pun there, ha ha)
That's a great question. I haven't changed parties as much as changed my connection to parties.
After voting 100% Republican for most of my life, I decided to vote for a Democrat who clearly was a better candidate. I couldn't vote for the drunken, extremist Republican incumbent. It turned out to be a freeing experience.
I now try to put country before party. As a right of center independent, I still embrace Republican principles such as individual responsibility, fiscal conservatism and limited government.
I will still vote for Republicans with integrity and sound policies. But I don't embrace any party or the people in charge of them.
Excellent question. I grew up in a town that was 98 percent Democrat. I was told at an early age that if you voted Republican it really didn't matter. So, I registered as a Democrat and just voted that way without thinking much about it. Then, in college, Ronald Reagan was president and got elected to his second term taking 49 of 50 states. So, I tried to figure out what he had that appealed to so many people. A professor suggested I get the platform of the Republican Party and the Democrat Party then compare and contrast. I did this and realized lower taxes, less government as well as pro life and more were more to my liking. I then switched parties to be a Republican. The professor who suggested this remained a dedicated Democrat, but a good guy and we had some interesting conversations about it.
Switch parties? Never gave it a thought. The philosophy and ideals of other party is far outside of any possibility of common ground, particularely in today's political climate.
Policies maybe, but ideals? Do you think individual responsibility is an acceptable ideal?
Makes you wonder how the issues might be debated if there were no Parties ? Individuals could choose their candidates based only on their position on the issues.
Promisem, it has been an exaggeration for the other party to insist that they are guardians of individual responsibility and such. It is much more their advocacy of predatory politics and crony capitalism. From youth on, I always knew who the bad guys were.... and why.
If you seriously believe that one Party has clean hands and the other doesn’t, then explain to us why regardless of who is in office that things seem to just stay the same? We don’t even need to name names or call people out, but almost everyone who goes to Washington comes back a millionaire - that’s not magic, that’s corruption. The salaries of lawmakers don’t translate into several homes, sweet vacations, and a lifetime of luxury.
You're right, Ralph, both parties are part of the problem, it just appears more intractable from the GOP side of the ledger. I prefer the ideology and principles of the Democratic party over the Republican. That makes the reality of corruption as part of politics a bit more bearable.
I respect your convictions, however I don't think the Democratic Party of today is the same Party of Kennedy. It seems to me that certain fringe groups have hijacked it for their own use; this includes progressives, liberals, and even some who push for a social democrat system similar to the EU model.
Credence, let's cut out the hypocrisy what certain people say and do and instead focus on just political philosophy.
The "Republican" party gets its name from the political concept of a republic. The "Democratic" party gets its name from the concept of a democracy.
It seems only logical that individual responsibility is an ideal that fits more with a republic (benefits the individual) than with a democracy (benefits the group).
That's not to say one party has total ownership of individual responsibility. It's just that it fits more with one party than the other.
We got off on a foul start, Promisem, let me clarify things a bit.
I disagree more often and consistently with the principles and ideology of the Republicans when compared with the Democratic party.
That comes down to:
1. Domestic Economy
3. Social Issues
While how they define themselves may be well and good, these fundamental differences in how you and I may see their philosophy as it translates into policies on the ground remains the rub.
No one is going to deny the importance of individual responsibility but how is that interpreted and what extent?
But, again, that is just me.
Well said, Credence. Thanks for clarifying. I agree that the rub is the translation of philosophy into policies.
It's why I'm so critical of the party in recent years and why some conservatives on here think I'm a Democrat.
Either side, it all ends up going to pro tagteam wrestling for Megalomaniacs. As the have a beer together after the ugly show.
I'm just a reporter for the Ugly Freak show Network. I meet alot of them during my performing art shows worldwide.
I was fully indoctrinated a liberal in high school by young, liberal ,new college grad teachers , graduating in '72, in 1976 I was influenced to vote Carter essentially because he wore blue jeans and acted independent of traditional politics , [ Sanders similarities today ? ].......by 1980 I was reading Reagan's news paper columns and making up my own mind , voting Reagan then and conservative since.
The" breaking point "?
Learning independent thought , self reasoning and regurgitating liberal group thought by violent reverse peristalsis.
Carter was a nice guy, the best ex President to date.
I’d like to hear more on why you think Carter was the best former President since most political historians feel he did a very poor job of running the nation. Not trying to argue, just curious.
Not the best President, a good manager and not harmful.
His work contribution afterwards, makes him the best former president
On most issues I think you are right, he was kind-of neutral, but the hostage crisis at the end of his term made him look weak, which in turn made the US look weak - I think that's when he took most of the criticism. And unfortunately he was at the helm during the oil crisis too.
RJ, I believe you can also mention the economy was a bit dismal under Carter as well.
by mio cid 4 years ago
One of the reasons we won't see a republican president in our lifetime is because Democrats recognize the fact that in order to win the presidency the democratic candidate has to be a " Republican Light " but the republican base is not willing to accept a " Democrat Light...
by Dennis L. Page 6 years ago
Could a Republican and a Democrat work as President and Vice President of the United States?With so much divisiveness in the United States, would the country become more united if we had a Democrat and a Republican or a Republican and a Democrat as President and Vice President? Currently I think...
by Graham Gifford 6 years ago
Would it be wise to have both a republican and a democrat occupy the oval office?With the up-and-coming presidential election and both side expressing their willingness to be bipartisan, would it be best for these United States to come together in a more literally sense and work hand-in-hand?
by Susan Keeping 8 years ago
And don't Google it."The Republican party goes right along, from year to year ... until it has come to think that the political power of the United States is its property, and that it is a sort of insolence for any other party to aspire to any part of that power. Nothing can be worse for a...
by IslandBites 3 weeks ago
Why is this relevant?The move narrows the GOP's hold on the state House to 53 seats to Democrats' 47.Iowa is also a swing state -- former President Barack Obama won it twice -- that had shifted rapidly in Republicans' favor in recent years. Trump won there in 2016 by nearly 10 percentage points.
by Charles James 6 years ago
I am not an American, but what goes on in the USA is important to the world.Lincoln was a Republican and freed the slaves. One would expect black Americans to generally vote Republican. But they don't.How did this come about?
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|