Blue Wave, Red Wave, or Turbulent Purple Waters?

Jump to Last Post 1-7 of 7 discussions (46 posts)
  1. RJ Schwartz profile image88
    RJ Schwartzposted 2 years ago

    I'd like to express my thanks to everyone here on HP and on many other sites across the nation.  Most days we get engaged in the "topic of the day," and we debate it until there are no talking points left to ponder.  Other days, we prognosticate and make predictions about how things are going to turn out.  And on those rare days when political news is scant, we find time to catch up on our commenting on other Hubs or articles. It's an honor to 'argue' with most of you.

    We find it engaging and important, however our debates are much more than that.  This small group of focused political junkies on HP helps many people see both sides of every issue; sides which they may never be exposed to otherwise.  We are performing a small public service by debating things in a public forum that most of the mainstream media can't do, simply because of their formats.

    I hope at the end of the day tomorrow, regardless of how you are feeling, that everyone will continue to participate in the Electoral process here in America and exercise the Constitutional Rights afforded to you by your citizenship in this nation.  Let your voices be heard by casting a vote for the person you feel will best represent your own personal beliefs.  Stay safe and good luck!

    1. profile image0
      PrettyPantherposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Nice post, RJ. I concur.

      Thank you for posting this.

      1. MizBejabbers profile image88
        MizBejabbersposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        Ralph, that is a very nice post. We voted early to avoid the rush. It is very nice to be able to walk right in and cast our ballots without waiting in line for hours. I recommend it. Now tonight we are waiting to see if the waters are blue, red, or purple.

        1. RJ Schwartz profile image88
          RJ Schwartzposted 2 years agoin reply to this

          So what do we think on the "day after"?  Sounds like if the nation is going to keep moving forward, maybe the two parties will have to start working together, just like they used to in the old days; when government was more civil and issues were resolved by good old fashioned compromise.

          1. profile image0
            PrettyPantherposted 2 years agoin reply to this

            Most of us would welcome that. Only extremists think "compromise" is a dirty word.

            Pelosi specifically mentioned an infrastructure bill as a possible bipartisan effort. What will Trump and the Republicans say?

            1. RJ Schwartz profile image88
              RJ Schwartzposted 2 years agoin reply to this

              The nation is literally exhausted from the back and forth rhetoric between the parties - from reading the news, Nancy Pelosi and President Trump spoke and there were no mentions of anything other than moving the country forward....but as like everyone else, I'll believe that when I see it.  Personally I'd like to see real reform on immigration as it was one of the top items on exit polling for many people.  America cannot support constant illegal entry anymore.

              1. wilderness profile image96
                wildernessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

                From what I saw, the #1 priority on people's minds was health care.  Immigration and Infrastructure came in far behind...while ignoring that if we quit providing free health care for 10 million aliens it would do a lot to cut costs of our own health care.

                1. JAKE Earthshine profile image74
                  JAKE Earthshineposted 2 years agoin reply to this

                  Actually, if congress repeals the trillions in insane Corporate Welfare Tax Cuts Mr. Trump and republicans just gave the greedy filthy rich so they can shower every morning in thousand dollar bills, we'd be well on our way to implementing a "Medicare For ALL" plan which would provide ALL Americans with comprehensive healthcare:

                  ooooooooh righty republicans think that's just bad lol:

            2. wilderness profile image96
              wildernessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

              Can't imagine Pelosi working with Republicans, and specifically with Donald Trump, on anything at all.  And can't see any thinking person believing she will, either - there cannot be a more partisan member of congress than Pelosi.

              1. hard sun profile image84
                hard sunposted 2 years agoin reply to this

                It might not even be Pelosi in charge. But, I think you could say the same about most any Republican so there's not much point here. The only thing we can do is wait and see.

                1. wilderness profile image96
                  wildernessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

                  No argument there.  I don't think there is one legislator out of a hundred that is willing to actually work with someone with different ideas.

          2. MizBejabbers profile image88
            MizBejabbersposted 2 years agoin reply to this

            I think that's a great idea and I'm all for it. I have to say that I really thought the Dems would gain the Senate and the GOP would keep the House. Surprise, surprise!

          3. Jean Bakula profile image95
            Jean Bakulaposted 2 years agoin reply to this

            I expected Democrats to win the majority in the House. There were too many seats to defend and a few to win for the Senate. But there is usually a "flip" to whatever party the President isn't in any midterm election.

            I hope they can work together and find some compromises, but wonder if it's possible. It seemed clear health care is on everyone's minds. If the D's can get their act together and put forth some good ideas, it would be a good thing.

            I was watching MSNBC, and as soon as it was clear the D's got the majority in the House, a "Breaking News" scroll came on that already made a threat about Trumps's tax returns. Although I think he should release them, and don't know who said this, it was a poor way to kick off what has the potential to be a compromise of ideas. I hope the D's don't blow it. I was happy to see so many women elected to office.

            It was sad then to see that Trump fired Sessions already. Was it to steal the Democrat's thunder? He was angry and rude to the press. They also came off as rude, but it is their job to get answers to their questions, so they are placed in a hostile situation with this President who can't stand the press. Most Presidents don't like the press, but have an easier time getting along.

            We can't have a real democracy without a free press, and the fact he got rid of Sessions so soon doesn't bode well. He can't obstruct this investigation, so Mueller better act fast if he has anything. I didn't expect Trump to be gracious, but he seemed and looked furious at the press conference, insisting people liked him. He isn't going to change. He still thinks it's Celebrity Apprentice and it's all about him. He thinks the FBI is there to protect him, not understanding that these bodies are to protect the American people. It's not the mob.

            We can only hope the D's in the House won't obstruct everything, since there are areas where agreement can be found. But then when Obama was President, it was 8 yrs. of obstruction. So I'm somewhat happy, but don't expect much.

            I also heard Pelosi was eventually going to step down and Adam Schiff would be the majority leader. I think it's time for a change there.

            1. wilderness profile image96
              wildernessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

              I have to disagree on the media "asking questions".  For the most part, they did just that, but the episode that caused the ruckus and Trump's violent reaction was not a question at all; it was an outright attack, via a speech, on his actions.  Things like "Why are you setting Americans against Americans" are not designed to get an answer; they are designed and asked in order to make a political statement. ("Have you stopped beating your wife yet" comes to mind.) As such they do not deserve either an answer or a platform to be asked.  Finally, when a reporter refuses to give up the microphone when asked to, it's time that reporter left the room.  Same for one that simply stands and begins speaking without ever being recognized.

              1. Jean Bakula profile image95
                Jean Bakulaposted 2 years agoin reply to this

                I respectfully disagree. I saw the clip and Trump said the reporter "attacked" the woman on his staff, he clearly did not. He doesn't want a free press, so it's now turned into a very hostile situation. All press pools ask questions they know won't get an answer, there are so many attending the briefings and it's a coup to be called on. Could they be more polite? Of course.

                At the risk of being repetitive, no POTUS likes the press. He makes situations hostile, and I would go as far as to say he likes to create an atmosphere which encourages violence. It's like the rallies. He sets the tone for the country, and people are getting more and more violent, because he is telling them in code that it's OK to act like an a$$.

  2. Kathryn L Hill profile image80
    Kathryn L Hillposted 2 years ago

    Turbulent purple waters! Sounds yucky. I won't put one toe in it!

    Now, if the waters were more reddish, they would be wine colored. That would be okay!
    cool

    1. profile image0
      Ed Fisherposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Red Blend ?

    2. RJ Schwartz profile image88
      RJ Schwartzposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      mmmm....I'm sure people will need more than wine after tonight

      1. Kathryn L Hill profile image80
        Kathryn L Hillposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        me.

  3. profile image0
    RTalloniposted 2 years ago

    Thanks for positive encouragement to vote!  Outcomes are going to be interesting on so many levels. Watching various ads from across the country is a wonder. In South Carolina one candidate is pro legislation for veterans getting Medicaid. If he were pro veterans getting the same health care he gets he would be on to a good thing, or if he were going to use Medicaid services rather than his exclusive health care providers his professed care for veterans would be believable. Veterans deserve better than Medicaid services. If that's all they can get, well, it is what it is, but they deserve better. The point is, yes, let's vote! But please think through the vote!

    1. MizBejabbers profile image88
      MizBejabbersposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Rtalloni, You're right, our wonderful veterans deserve the best of health care, but they don't always get it. If a veteran can get better health care on medicaid, then I'm for it. My husband is a Vietnam veteran, and we live in a city with a large regional VA hospital that offers both mental and physical care. However, we still carry private insurance along with his medicare because he still does not get the best of care from the VA. For instance, he has had to go outside the VA for total knee replacement and for rotator cuff surgery. Then the VA sent him to a private cardiologist to determine if he needed a pacemaker. Then the records from that cardiologist got lost. Hubby went back to him on our private insurance and they made an appointment for an evaluation for a pacemaker for which we were going to have to fork over a large deductible. Five days before that appointment, I took him to the emergency room at the VA. That night he nearly died. Three days later the VA installed a pacemaker (they called in a cardiovascular surgeon from the university hospital) and he cancelled the appointment with the private doctor. However, he still keeps his non-VA doctor appointments because the VA has no cardiologist on staff.
      I know that we got off subject here, but I felt like you needed an explanation of why some of our veterans might need medicaid until something can be done to upgrade the system that is supposed to take care of them. His story is typical, and many veterans die or go without medical care for lack of VA service. We are fortunate that we can afford private insurance to supplement my husband's VA care.

      1. profile image0
        RTalloniposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        Yes, I do understand. The VA system is overburdened. However, the Medicaid system is a step down, not up. In some cases Medicaid services may be better than nothing, but not always is that true. There are some great health care workers in the system but those few are so limited and overburdened it's impossible to describe. And what patients suffer in the system called health care is not reported. People think they want government health care but they need to think again. Liberal sounding politicians make these decisions while their own health care is protected. The class system such people promote is stunning. I'm thankful you and your husband are able to have the supplement.

        1. MizBejabbers profile image88
          MizBejabbersposted 2 years agoin reply to this

          I think you and I agree on most points. One thing I forgot to mention was that a lot of veterans have to travel hundreds of miles to a VA medical center. I know that they are reimbursed for their travel expenses, but it is hard for me to imagine having to travel 150-300 miles for routine care, much less when facing an urgent problem. I believe in an emergency, they are allowed to see a local physician but after they are stabilized, they must be taken to a VA facility.
          Medicaid is not the ideal thing to have, however, neither is the government sponsored "free" insurance that is not considered medicaid. Many doctors don't accept either one. My son was on government insurance because he couldn't work and was refused disability. Disability claimed that he could work, but he had been a salesman and a restaurant worker. Nobody in their right mind would hire someone with a measles-like rash all over his body, plus he couldn't stand on his feet all day. He really didn't have much choice in his medical care. He had an autoimmune disease that was killing his kidneys, and I blame his death on having to go to a teaching hospital for his care. He did not receive proper care and died of blood clots in his heart. My husband believes that they let him die so they could study his rare disease. It actually appears that way to me.

  4. hard sun profile image84
    hard sunposted 2 years ago

    Thanks for the thread. I also appreciate the vast majority of those who comment here. I feel I learn some things from most of you, whether we disagree or agree. May the best candidates win who will see our nation through some very divisive times.

  5. hard sun profile image84
    hard sunposted 2 years ago

    We could have a month long budget discussion, including military, infrastructure, etc. Otherwise we are "ignoring" a whole lot of factors when we say we want a better healthcare system.

  6. profile image0
    PrettyPantherposted 2 years ago

    Watching Trump presser right now. He is not going to stop being divisive. Just called the press the enemy of the people again. He is combative, rude, and authoritarian.

    1. wilderness profile image96
      wildernessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      LOL  And those idiot reporters weren't!  Got it.

      1. profile image0
        PrettyPantherposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        They were behaving the way reporters have behaved for hundreds of years. Trump is the only President with an ego so fragile he can't handle it without being abusive.

    2. JAKE Earthshine profile image74
      JAKE Earthshineposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      "Watching Trump presser right now. He is not going to stop being divisive. Just called the press the enemy of the people again. He is combative, rude, and authoritarian."

      AND will be impeached:

      1. wilderness profile image96
        wildernessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        Better look up who makes the vote for actual impeachment, and what it requires.  Make sure you're sitting down when you do; the shock to your dreams could be deadly.

        1. JAKE Earthshine profile image74
          JAKE Earthshineposted 2 years agoin reply to this

          When the LONG overdue congressional investigations begin to uncover the horrifying truth as the Mueller investigation already is, the senate will be forced to reconsider the unlawful act of protecting the most corrupt, illegitimate president in history who could obviously care less about you, your family or this crumbling country:

          It may be as easy as a subpoena for his tax returns but who knows, maybe not:

          1. wilderness profile image96
            wildernessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

            Please.  Please be sitting down when you look up that minor bit of information.  Your dreams will certainly suffer a major shock.

            I DO wonder about subpoenas for tax returns though: can liberals find a judge corrupt enough to agree to that when the only reason is "We're searching desperately to find something to get Trump out of office and need you to violate your oath and help us.  Plus, we hate him".  Perhaps the ninth circuit, but from there it goes to SCOTUS of course.

            1. JAKE Earthshine profile image74
              JAKE Earthshineposted 2 years agoin reply to this

              You can't be serious wilderness: FYI Michael Cohen, Stubby's former personal attorney was negotiating business in Moscow while he was running for presidential office and Mr. MAGA desperately tried to cover it up and to this very day he denies it: UNREAL and Beyond Dishonest:

              Just one example of why congress will have no problem with subpoena power to uncover the cover up:

              1. wilderness profile image96
                wildernessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

                They may indeed get it through an unethical, liberally biased  judge.  SCOTUS is another matter, don't you think?

                1. RJ Schwartz profile image88
                  RJ Schwartzposted 2 years agoin reply to this

                  Jake, did you read the news?  Jeff Sessions is OUT at DOJ

                  1. JAKE Earthshine profile image74
                    JAKE Earthshineposted 2 years agoin reply to this

                    YES RJ, and the CODE Red Constitutional Crisis we've been forced to endure since Mr. Trump was inaugurated just turned into a color that we need to invent that's redder than red:

                    There are so many reasons for Donald to be impeached and or indicted and I started a thread which documents all the criminal and civil evidence available now to the public, but it's un-constitutional, a federal crime to receive monetary consideration and or gifts from foreign entities and that's just a no brainer:.

                    Mr. Trump and we presume his entire family has been receiving gifts since day one of the inauguration:

                    This is a level of corruption which is un-heard of and it's absurd to think as we speak, it continues:UNREAL:

                    Now I ask you seriously RJ, political affiliation aside, do you honestly believe a sitting president should be allowed receive any kind of benefit from any foreign entity to the extent that he and his family obviously do? The U.S. Constitution which conservatives once adored, says it's a federal crime:

      2. profile image0
        PrettyPantherposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        I know you want it, but it won't happen unless Rs get on board and we've already seen they're willing to throw our country's ideals and institutions under the bus.

    3. hard sun profile image84
      hard sunposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      That is THE major problem. How can we expect legislators to work with others of different ideas when we have this as our "leader?"  I think many Americans are not too far off on some of the major issues but this guy makes it impossible.

      Whenever I had a boss that acted that way, I told him to get bent and went on down the road.

  7. profile image0
    Ed Fisherposted 2 years ago

    Jean , Sadly we cannot begin to have the" free press ' , the one that we once  HAD ,   as your party owns the majority of media and saluted their incredible bias all through Trump's first two years .  CNN and Acosta got exactly what he and they deserved , look at the media ratings and polls............

    Democrats , Schiff , Pelosi , Cuomo , will continue their obstructive agenda , they can't help it , they will impeach on more phases of an ongoing bias of hate , that is what they are known for .......Yer what will get past the Senate , not much , as with Clinton they will get an impeachment in the house only .

    Conservatives have learned the most important lesson that they EVER will learn these last two years , their is no" compromise " from the left there is ONLY a manifest desire to acquire more from government at all costs ,   more of a dream of democratic /socialism and a creeping movement towards that ! The old democrat is out and the new is in power .

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)